Preview

Summary Of How Democratic Was The Roman Republic?

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
379 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of How Democratic Was The Roman Republic?
In the Information articles, “How Democratic was the Roman Republic?” written by Alan Ward shows the Roman Empire could not be considered democratic because the rome citizens have no likelihood of being able to cast their vote regularly, but a group of unrepresentative voters can easily dominate sovereign popular institution. So wishes of the people as a whole are not expressed.

First, there were very practical barriers to fair and equitable voting in the popular assemblies. For instance, “ all voting had to be conduct in Rome.” ( From “How democratic was the Roman Republic?” written by Alan Ward) Once Roman territory has expanded, it was mostly the well-to-do rural voters and their clients who could afford time and expense to come to Rome

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Apart from who they allowed to be citizens, their ways of election were also different. In Athens, they had election by lottery meaning that every person had an equal chance. This was fairer than Rome's inheritance of their position in the Senate, but it was completely random, and the most ineligible person could be chosen. In order to make important decisions like laws or ostracisms, there needed to be a minimum of six thousand. Rome only needed three hundred to form the senate.…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The primary purpose of democratic government is of course to represent the will of the people in the form of the sovereign and its policies. In the quest for empire, however, this goal becomes difficult and potentially detrimental in the face of great political, economic, and social changes. Athens was a direct democracy, and Rome was a republic of a democratic and oligarchical mix, but the small and inefficient forms of statecraft of both civilizations were not equipped to effectively manage the empires both would become. The problem with democracy in empire is rooted in the issue that democracy itself seeks to answer – the issue of representation.…

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    A senator in ancient Rome was a little different. Their senate was chosen from patricians’. Patricians were considered the upper class of Rome. Senators were usually relatives of past senators. They were also the people who made up the laws and controlled much of the spending. Although ancient Rome had senator the emperor was the ultimate ruler. Romans did not elect people to the senate. They were chosen from the…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Democracy is a type of government that is meant to give power to the people and give them control over their government and allow their voice to be heard. The democracy in Greece was incredibly direct, citizens could vote on each individual thing, however to be qualified as a citizen you had to be a male born of Athenian parents, all citizens could hold positions of power and their roles were chosen based on chance. As a citizen you were able to participate in votes and your voice was heard giving you a great impact on the government, however the requirements for citizenship caused people who were not citizens to have little say, for them the votes weren’t democratic. Unlike Greece, Rome had a representative democracy, the citizens of Rome, both plebeians and patricians could vote on who they wanted to represent them, however only patricians could hold positions of power. The Roman republic had three tiers, patricians could hold positions in all three, while it took many years for Plebeians to be able to hold all the positions of power. When we consider democracy to be based based on the say of the people, Rome was more democratic compared to Greece.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How Did Sparta Change

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages

    As the age of the Greeks was coming to an end, a small kingdom in central Italy was gaining power and growing. During this time, Rome was not yet the Rome as we know it today. In 753 BCE the Kingdom of Rome was founded on a hill top right next to the Tiber River. This kingdom lasted for around 200 years until in 509 BCE when the people of Rome overthrew the king and created a republic. Like the Athenians, the Romans also showed pride in their participation in government. However unlike the Athenians the Romans set up a republic in which the people of Rome voted for representatives and those reps then discussed, voted and participated in the government. This in turn meant that political participation in Rome was less direct than it had been in their Greek counterparts but, this in no way stopped the Romans from participation in politics. The Romans believed in one very important virtue. This virtue was called gravitas and it represented the Roman’s seriousness and importance it put toward aspects of life, one of which was politics. The Romans felt that being involved in government was a civil duty that all Romans must know about it. The people of Rome felt this way because they did not want to revert back to the time when they were ruled by kings. Unfortunately the era of the republic began to fall as a cycle of violence ensued. Rome was in constant chaos at this time and as shown throughout…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The First Triumvirate between Gaius Julius Caesar, Gnaius Pompeius Magnus (Pompey) and Marcus Licinius Crassus contributed to the fall of the Roman Republic by undermining the Senate, which was unable to effectively deal with an expanding and diverse empire. This was affected by the triumvirate appealing directly to popular assemblies, because their alliance conflicted directly with the conservative Optimates, who refused to change with Rome's expansion. Though ultimately because each triumvir, being an ambitious general and politician was clambering for the same place; to be top man of Rome. The very inception of the Triumvirate, and the resulting power swing it created was the beginning of the end for the Republic.…

    • 1417 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 509 B.C., Rome became a republic, a government in which power is controlled by the common people. It was under this Republic that Rome grew and expanded by conquest into the most powerful nation in the world at the time. As Roman territory increased, however, politicians and generals became more and more powerful and hungry for power. A series of events during the 1st and 2nd centuries B.C. led to the demise of the Roman Republic. Under the reigns of Julius Caesar and Augustus Caesar, the Roman Empire was formed. The Empire was ruled by an emperor, who had complete control over his people. Power was no longer in the hands of the people, but Rome continued to prosper and expand for several centuries. Under the Republic, senators were elected by the people to run the government. The vote of wealthy landowners counted for more than others and many elections were fixed by bribes. However, the common people still maintained a significant power in government affairs.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The expansion of Rome, the ruling of Julius Caesar and his death, and the civil war that followed his death all led to the collapse of the Roman Republic.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Han vs. Rome

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Roman Empire seems to have upheld monarchy, aristocracy and democracy together in Rome. Rome was divided into two classes, one being the Patricians, which were the small group of aristocratic people and the second being the Plebeians, which were the commoners and everyone else. Rome was an innovator in that they created the first known body of the senate, chosen by the elite class to represent their decisions. The senate was supposed to set policies for the consuls and elect 2 people as chief executives of Rome, one to take care of Rome domestically and make sure that everything as going well inside the empire and the other to conquer new territories and fight wars. Each consul had a one year term check and a senator was not able to serve as consul again after serving for it once before until 10 years later. There was also a position of dictator in Rome when it faced terrible danger and a person would have to step up and take control of the army to face whatever enemy was opposing them. Yet, once Octavian or Caesar Augustus took over, he made the laws and the senate was no longer useful. The emperors were almost always generals because Rome decided to become an empire and conquer new lands so the republic aspect of Rome was shrouded in the hands of one man with most of…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The success of the Romans started with their organization within the city. Almost all citizens could vote, and after plebeians were allowed to hold office, almost anybody could be appointed to the Senate and other governmental positions. Voting created a pride in the city, as every person held a stake in the city. It created a sprit that could be seen on the battlefield. Voting also allowed for merit…

    • 1649 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Comparing and contrasting the final turbulent between the Roman republic and U.S. politics were both controlling land outside of their borders, had the three branches of government, system of checks and balance with no branch of government being the strongest. Some of the differences were that Rome conquered control by subjection and the U.S. tires to include people into the nation. Every citizen that was born in the U.S. had natural rights, but in Rome you were just subjects and not citizens.…

    • 82 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Roman Republic Timeline

    • 2173 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The murder of Tiberius Gracchus by a mob of senators and their clients gave clear notice that the ruling consensus of the Roman Republic was shattered. Tiberius Gracchus took office as the tribune of the plebs in late 134 BCE when "everything in the Roman Republic seemed to be in fine working order."4 However, during this time Roman society was highly stratified in terms of class, and divisions bubbled just below the surface. Consisting in this system were noble families of the senatorial rank, the knight or equestrian class, citizens (grouped into two or three classes depending on the time period - self-governing allies of Rome, landowners, and plebs or tenant freemen), non-citizens who lived outside of south-western Italy, and at the bottom, slaves. Only men who were citizens could vote in certain assemblies, and only men who owned over a certain threshold of property could serve in the military; a career that granted social prestige and other benefits of citizenship. The Roman government owned large plantations of farming land that it had gained through invasion, and rented these lands out to large landowners, whose slaves worked the land. There was some social mobility and limited suffrage. The plebeians were a socio-economic class, and were the ‘populist’ political party during this time, aiming to ensure that the lower classes (only of…

    • 2173 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Romans arranged their government into branches, consuls and praetors. This kind of governing system is one of Romans’ legacies for many today government systems. For instance, it can be understood as the House of Senate and the House of Representative in American government. However, the balance of power actually slightly favored the consul branch that consisted of two men who had the power to administer government and controlling army. On the contrary, Praetor branch appeared later and its main task was civil law administration. In fact, the power was really laid in the hand of a group of men who were rich and had influence in the Roman Society. Actually, the Republic of Rome was shaky once when the argument arose between two groups of Romans, the patricians who were wealthy, holding extremely power and the plebeians who were the rest of society, seeking the equality or basically they were looking for the democracy. As the result, the plebeians acquired some of what they wish for, such as more rights for the plebeians, all men were equal under the law, and a council of plebs was created in 471 BC to protect the plebeians against the patricians. However, the democracy had never come into being because of the intermarriage phenomenon between the plebeians and patricians that formed a…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The representative democracy started in in ancient Athens around 508 BCE and it wasn’t called representative democracy it was called direct democracy. Direct democracy lets the people make decisions and not the representatives. Ancient Rome started it, but the U.S. could be called a representative government because we elect representatives to make laws.…

    • 53 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Roman Republic, which was established in 510 BC after the defeat Etruscan conquerors, was in some ways an oligarchy. It was not a democracy as it is understood today. The Roman republic was ruled by a small group; consuls, and the Senate. To avoid trouble, none of these had absolute power. The Senate was a part of Roman aristocrats known as patricians or the wealthy upper class. They could oversee public funds and advise the Roman kings. They were from wealthy family and stayed in the position for life. The consuls were usually two magistrates elected by the patricians. They had the say on when to go to war or when to implement new laws. Both the consuls and the Senate worked hand in hand, although steadily over the years, the Senate gained more power. The Senate was the major body in the Republic. They swayed the decisions of the two consuls.…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays