Summary Of How Democratic Was The Roman Republic?

Satisfactory Essays
In the Information articles, “How Democratic was the Roman Republic?” written by Alan Ward shows the Roman Empire could not be considered democratic because the rome citizens have no likelihood of being able to cast their vote regularly, but a group of unrepresentative voters can easily dominate sovereign popular institution. So wishes of the people as a whole are not expressed.

First, there were very practical barriers to fair and equitable voting in the popular assemblies. For instance, “ all voting had to be conduct in Rome.” ( From “How democratic was the Roman Republic?” written by Alan Ward) Once Roman territory has expanded, it was mostly the well-to-do rural voters and their clients who could afford time and expense to come to Rome

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Democracy is a system controlled by people in which they rule their own government. Democracy most of the time is seen as fair by the people. There are also requirements to being truly identified as democratic. The Roman Republic was only democratic to a certain extent. It’s government consisted only of men. This isn’t fair to the women and slaves when making decisions for the government. It isn’t fair to women because they were also citizens.…

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rome’s government was one of the factors that led to the eventual fall of Rome. Many people in Rome felt like they had been excluded from playing an active role in their government. This caused people to begin to view elections as unimportant. As a result, many people stopped participating in the elections. Rome had also become extremely difficult to govern due to its huge size. Emporors with different ideas and visions for Rome were assasinated within less than…

    • 235 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The First Triumvirate between Gaius Julius Caesar, Gnaius Pompeius Magnus (Pompey) and Marcus Licinius Crassus contributed to the fall of the Roman Republic by undermining the Senate, which was unable to effectively deal with an expanding and diverse empire. This was affected by the triumvirate appealing directly to popular assemblies, because their alliance conflicted directly with the conservative Optimates, who refused to change with Rome's expansion. Though ultimately because each triumvir, being an ambitious general and politician was clambering for the same place; to be top man of Rome. The very inception of the Triumvirate, and the resulting power swing it created was the beginning of the end for the Republic.…

    • 1417 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In 509 b.c., Rome changed their government to a Republic which became an internal conflict amongst the Romans. This was largely due to the fact that the Republic had a Senate and a Consul, both of which were positions of authority only given to the wealthy men of Rome, also called Patricians. Many disputes among the people of Rome began to arise, and acts of violence even began to occur within the empire walls. It was not until the less wealthy citizens found an officer that would vote in their favor and veto the bills of the rich. Once the people of Rome solved the political issue, and had a stable government, they began to take control…

    • 1926 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Apart from who they allowed to be citizens, their ways of election were also different. In Athens, they had election by lottery meaning that every person had an equal chance. This was fairer than Rome's inheritance of their position in the Senate, but it was completely random, and the most ineligible person could be chosen. In order to make important decisions like laws or ostracisms, there needed to be a minimum of six thousand. Rome only needed three hundred to form the senate.…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    One of the differences in the government of the United States and ancient Rome is the United States has a two party system, Democrats and Republicans, but Romans had an emperor. Within our two party systems a president is elected into office and the Romans chose an emperor based on their social status. Our president serves a four-year term and no more than two terms. Emperors had no term limits and served for life.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The primary purpose of democratic government is of course to represent the will of the people in the form of the sovereign and its policies. In the quest for empire, however, this goal becomes difficult and potentially detrimental in the face of great political, economic, and social changes. Athens was a direct democracy, and Rome was a republic of a democratic and oligarchical mix, but the small and inefficient forms of statecraft of both civilizations were not equipped to effectively manage the empires both would become. The problem with democracy in empire is rooted in the issue that democracy itself seeks to answer – the issue of representation.…

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    [ 5 ]. Dennis Sherman, Western Civilization: Sources, Images, Interpretations: Volume 1 (New York McGraw Hill 2004), 27…

    • 2499 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    * After many years of service abroad, they found their farms deteriorated that they chose to sell their land…

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The representative democracy started in in ancient Athens around 508 BCE and it wasn’t called representative democracy it was called direct democracy. Direct democracy lets the people make decisions and not the representatives. Ancient Rome started it, but the U.S. could be called a representative government because we elect representatives to make laws.…

    • 53 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Roman Government

    • 2157 Words
    • 9 Pages

    What Influence did Gaius Julius Caesar and Augustus have on the reforms of the government from a Republic to an Empire?…

    • 2157 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every civilization experiences times of great prosperity and peace, which leads to new advancements and peaceful relations. More importantly every civilization has to deal with times of crisis and conflict, it is how they deal with these situations that determine their success as a civilization. The social issues the Roman Republic faced were handled well and helped to establish a new form of law.…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    World Empires

    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Between 200 B.C.E. – 200 C.E. The Roman Empire ruled with an iron fist controlling mostly and if not all of the Mediterranean. This was due to two main factors, these are it military power and the political system it was able to develop. However most of the Romans accomplishment didn’t happen as an empire, but a republic. While as a republic, Romans created a political system that heavily influenced many to move to the Rome. In the article Ways of the World by Robert W. Strayer he states that the political system created “a written code of law offered plebeians (the poor class) some protection from abuse” from the upper or elite classes. Also this provided a better “system of public assemblies [that] provided an opportunity for lower classes to shape public policy and a new office of tribune” that would represent them in these assemblies. This was a huge part of Rome popularity and its growing number. This was the first time were the poorer classes had any kind of support from a political system. The Romans had get deal of pride with their newly developed system that benefited everyone. They also believed that the political system gave them a “greater freedom than did many of their more autocratic neighbors.”…

    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Roman Republic, which was established in 510 BC after the defeat Etruscan conquerors, was in some ways an oligarchy. It was not a democracy as it is understood today. The Roman republic was ruled by a small group; consuls, and the Senate. To avoid trouble, none of these had absolute power. The Senate was a part of Roman aristocrats known as patricians or the wealthy upper class. They could oversee public funds and advise the Roman kings. They were from wealthy family and stayed in the position for life. The consuls were usually two magistrates elected by the patricians. They had the say on when to go to war or when to implement new laws. Both the consuls and the Senate worked hand in hand, although steadily over the years, the Senate gained more power. The Senate was the major body in the Republic. They swayed the decisions of the two consuls.…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Roman Republic Timeline

    • 2173 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The Roman Republic, the precursor to the colossal Roman Empire; one that would last (in one form or another) for 1500 years, is the first example in European history of the complete collapse of a constitutional system. The Crises of the Roman Republic is contemporarily used to describe an extended period of time where Rome faced political instability and unrest that ended in the demise of all functions of the Republic, and the beginning of the Empire. This period lasted from about 134BCE until 27BCE, when Octavian took on the name Augustus, founded the Roman Empire, and became its first Emperor. However, some controversy exists in regards to the exact dates of the Crisis,…

    • 2173 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays