Preview

Summary Of God And The Problem Of Evil

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
430 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of God And The Problem Of Evil
God and the Problem of Evil by B.C. Johnson discusses what is called the problem of evil in philosophy. He specifically talks about the evidential problem of evil. The evidential problem of evil is the argument that if God is an all-powerful and all-knowing being than he cannot be all-good or omnibenevolent. How can an all-good God exist and allow evil things to happen to humankind? God supposedly has the power to stop evil from occurring, yet he does not. In the article by B.C. Johnson ponders this and forms the thesis that God cannot be omnibenevolent if he allows evil to take place. For the most part I agree with Johnson’s thesis, but I do not believe he sufficiently discredits the counterargument of the existence of free-will. One of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    In William L. Rowe 's paper "The Problem of Evil and Some Varieties of Atheism" he sets out to accomplish two main goals. The first goal is directed toward theists, while the second attempts to reach the very wellspring of an atheist 's heart. Foremost, Rowe sets out to show that there is "an argument for atheism based on the existence of evil that may rationally justify someone in being an atheist" (335). After he has effectively addressed this first issue he moves on to try and convince the atheist that in light of all the evidence that theists are rationally justified (just as much as the atheist) and therefore that atheists should subscribe to what Rowe calls "friendly atheism."…

    • 1206 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    ‘There seems to be a considerable contradiction and inconsistency between God’s foreknowledge and the existence of free will.’ (Boethius).…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the excerpt Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God by Jonathan Edwards, he demonstrates many different Puritan ideas. Edward feels just as the thoughts that are changing later on were based upon. He believes God as a deity who longs for his people to lead great, generous lives. Rather than talk gently about sinful behavior, Edwards considered it most effective to discuss God’s wrath. Rather than believing in the idea of predestination, he believed people had the power to save themselves by living a good life. His relationship with God was very strong, which encouraged him to to create better individuals by writing his sermons. The purpose is to aware of people of their behavior and conduct here on earth is for more significant more essential…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “To teach men that they possess the ability to turn from sin when they choose to do so is to hide the true extent of their need.” (Iain H. Murray, The Life of Martyn Lloyd-Jones). Jonathan Edwards essay Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God was a none-intrusive example of an essay written with the sole intention of projecting authority and reliability. It casts the only aspiration forth to frighten those attending by speaking directly to the reader with the goal of the conversation of many to the Puritanical Calvinistic view of Christianity. This was Jonathan Edwards goal in writing Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God, it is undoubtfully effective as by just reading I found it quite frightening.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Have you ever heard a motivational speech and while it was going on you felt so motivated, but when it was over you did not know what to do with yourself? In Beyond Scared Straight, "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God," and "Can Kids Be Scared Straight?" all three authors try to persuade people to do the right things in a forceful tone, but there are reasons why appeals to fear is not the best motivational force. Some reasons why appeals to fear is not the best motivational force are that people might not get scared, are not afraid of the negative consequences, and do not want to nor know how to change.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The only discussed solution that does not hold God responsible for evil in the world is the compatibilist approach to free will. Upon formulating this solution the two major issues are on the interpretation of omnipotence and freedom.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    P4: Evil is not due to God but to man’s misuse of the free will that God gave him (McCloskey & Hick, 332 &347).…

    • 1767 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Now using the same problem, evidential problem of evil cannot be attributed to it because that is their own argument. Their argument is that evil could be prevented from even happening. But the problem is how can one omniscient being be in control of every situation known to man? Doesn’t that just seem impossible? Or is it not? There is a difference between to know how to prove that and how to have a rational meaning to believe that. With our…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The argument of whether God exists is an age-old debate, both sides attempting to prove their viewpoint, but neither having factual proof. Those that argue for the existence of God claim that He is wholly good, omnipotent and omniscient. However, if that were true and God did possess all three of these attributes, how is it that evil exists in the world? There is pain and suffering, crime and natural disasters that occur daily. With that being said, why does evil exist?…

    • 690 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    If God is omnipotent, how can God let evil happen while he has the power to stop it? A proper definition of the omnipotent God is given by Thiessen: “God is all-powerful and able to do whatever he wills. Since his will is limited by his nature, God can do everything that is in harmony with his perfections.” I believe that the 3 beliefs of God limit him because they contradict each other.…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    To present the topic of “the problem with evil,” without acknowledging there is a God can be confusing. I think one of the best questions that you could ask is, why does God allow evil being a perfect and loving God (Elwell, pg 413…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Intro: In this article, I first presented the Free Will argument. Then I showed how it fails by questioning the necessity of natural evils. After that, I defended my response against a likely rebuttal.…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The problem of evil is a significant and enduring philosophical and theological debate. A question is often raised and discussed: if God is both all-loving and all-powerful, then how can evils-including natural evil and moral evil---exist in our world? In response to the charge that the evils of the world are incompatible with God's omnipotence and perfect goodness, the word"theodicy" is coined to deal with the problem of evil. Usually it is an attempt to show that it is possible to affirm the omnipotence of God, the love of God, and the reality of evil without contradiction. Two of the most well-known and most frequently discussed theodicies are the Augustinian theodicy and the Irenaean theodicy.…

    • 1488 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    If free will did not exist then how does it explain the good in evil in the world. For instance if God knew peoples destiny’s he would have it to where we would all choose to be good and holy as opposed to bad. But, this isn't the case because there is in fact bad out there in the world and the reason is because we as humans were given the right to choose for ourselves. Not only is there free will to choose between right and wrong but there also to love. We have the free will to love anyone we want and as many people as we want. If free will didn't exist then we would only be able to love one person for our life time which again isn't the case because there are so many divorces taking place because people fall out of love with each other. Another example is a prisoner may be said to possess no freedom, however he or she still possesses limited choices. In the very least the imprisoned human has the ability to make some action not determined by the institution whether it be to end his or her life or simply to speak certain words or make a specific eye…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While we are not aware of the details of this woman’s life, would this child have fared better if she had a mother like Tracy, Jamie, or Angela? If God is all knowing and he is good, why would he allow this child to suffer these traumatic moments? Could the sorrow of these women and the trauma of this child have been circumvented with God’s intervention?…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays