Preview

Summary Of Ghost Of Abu Gharib

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1017 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of Ghost Of Abu Gharib
The video, “Ghosts of Abu Gharib”, told the tale of inhumane treatment of Iraqi prisoners by United States military personnel in the early 2000’s. After the events that took place on September 11th, 2001 many individuals felt it was their need to join the army, fight for their country, and aid the war against terror. This was a very unique war because the rules of combat were not clearly stated because there was no straightforward law about treatment of individuals who were part of terror group. There was the Geneva law established in 1949 making torture illegal as an international law; however, it was not stated whether it applied to countries who were not part of making the law and did not enforce. One individual talked about his first day in combat asking about the …show more content…
There needs to not only be a real reason for an action, but one needs to think about those affected by the actions and the long-term effects. As Mill had preached all rights should be respected and to assess the moral aspect of an action one needs to think of the consequence as well. Interrogating someone so they are mentally controlled and sexually embarrassed is not something that is fleeting, but instead can scar someone much longer than a broken bone or bruise would. The actions of the individuals had very little positive outcome and nothing important came out of these interrogations besides extreme physical and mental pain, and in some cases death. People have a moral obligation to be best person they can and treat others in a manner that not only embodies this, but also promotes it. The ethical issues are not only with those who were directly involved, but also those who knew what was going on and chose not to help. Regardless if one is involved or not, it is everyone’s job to think about the greater good, and ignoring inhumane situations is no different than being part of one because doing nothing is a cognitive choice and the morally wrong

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    "Survey of FBI Agents who Observed Interrogation Techniques in Iraq Between March 2003 and December 2004." National Security. Kim Masters Evans. 2009 ed. Detroit: Gale, 2009. Information Plus Reference Series. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 9 Feb. 2014.…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This book talks about service members who tortured P.O.W’S of the war on terror. It also details how they take oaths to not torture prisoners of…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Guantanamo Bay Vs 9/11

    • 1651 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Instead of calling the alleged Taliban and Al-Qaeda detainees “prisoners of war”, the Bush administration called them “unlawful enemy combatants”. By doing so, the Bush administration denied the detainees all rights of prisoners of war under the Geneva Conventions. If the detainees at Guantanamo had prisoner of war status, they would be protected under the Third Geneva Convention against the inhumane treatment and the forceful extraction of information they faced in the detention camp. By interpreting the Third Geneva Convention in a literal manner, the Bush administration justified their decision to name the detainees at Guantanamo “unlawful enemy combatants”. According to the Bush administration and American lawyer John C. Yoo, because the Taliban was a “failed state”, its militia was not entitled to protection under the Conventions. In addition, because Taliban and al-Qaeda soldiers did not wear uniforms in combat they were not prisoners of…

    • 1651 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The stress of the situation plays a large part in how far someone is willing to go to break their moral values and the code of ethics. In 2003, these soldiers were still feeling the grief over the September 11, 2001 attacks. Some of the prisoners at Abu Ghraib were insurgents for…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout our nation's history, we have taken part in many unethical means of gaining information or knowledge. Some of the more famous cases include, The Milgram Obedience and Authority experiment, The Stanford Prison experiment, and of course the Abu Ghraib scandal involving our own U.S. soldiers. While two of these instances were not intended to cause physical harm, they were all branded unethical due to the extent of not only the physical abuses that took place, but the painful psychological impact it left on those involved.…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    9/11 Propaganda Essay

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Frequently mentioned in the news, the death toll in the Iraq War or suicide bombings contribute to the rise in fear that resides in Americans.. The head of the U.S Commission of Civil Rights, Peter Kirsanow, believes internment camps have a possibility of making a comeback especially if danger posed towards the Arab-Americans escalate. Arab-Americans would be much safer inside internment camps since they won’t be subjected to public humiliation or hate crimes. On the other hand, they would be forced to feel like they are not being treated as an equal. World War II resulted in 40,000 to 1,000,000 Iraqi civilian deaths which, compared to American’s deaths, is more drastic. The image of suicide bombers used by the media is a popular propaganda. The rates portrayed by the media of those that actually do participate in suicide bombings to be larger than they really are. The numbers of Arabs that do participate in suicide bombings, or bombing in general, are marginal compared to the rest of the…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    sdvcsd

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages

    From late 2003 to early 2004, during the Iraq War, military police personnel of the United States Army and the Central Intelligence Agency[1] committed human rights violations against prisoners held in the Abu Ghraib prison. They physically and sexually abused, tortured,[2][3][4] raped,[2][3] sodomized,[4] and killed[5] prisoners.…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Abu Ghraib prison was a prison in Iraq that was notorious for torturing the prisoners. Some of the violations include murder, sodomy, sexual abuse, and rape. Photographs of each torture mechanism were taken and shown to the government. Many of the American soldiers involved in the Abu Ghraib prison scandal were accused of abuse. The administration of George W. Bush tried to cover up the abuse cases as “isolated incidents”, therefore making it seem as if the torture was only happening to select inmates, and as a form of intense interrogation. It was later revealed that the torture was not conducted on a select few, but conducted throughout groups of the inmates. Some of the abusers in the prison believed that they were doing a good thing.…

    • 147 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “To torture or not to torture” – the main topic in debate between Charles Krauthammer and Andrew Sullivan is whether torture should be permissible under certain circumstances or never at all. The debate of torture between Krauthammer and Sullivan began three years after the Bush administration defined “torture” in the narrowest terms – the permitted coercive, physical abuse of enemy combatants if the military necessity demands it. (317) Krauthammer discusses extreme situations that make the use of torture seem less morally unethical and almost acceptable; however, his examples are just hypothetical situations. When I weigh his scenarios against reality and think about how much torture can really affect a person’s life, Krauthammer’s make-believe stories have no weight and do not sway my opinion one bit. On the other hand, Sullivan makes a strong point that I completely agree with. We are all humans, but allowing torture to be permissible would only lead to people treating others in a manner less than any human would ever deserve.…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many questions relating to the use of torture against any person whatsoever. As such, there are different perspectives on the ethics of its usage as well. While some believe that the use of torture becomes necessary at times, others believe that whatever the circumstances are, torture can never be justified. Some very pertinent issues related to the use of torture are, “Suppose a child has been kidnapped and a person has been suspected of committing the crime. Is it justifiable to torture that person in order to try to extract information from him about the child? Now suppose the person would not react at all if he is subjected to torture but there is a chance that he would divulge information if his child of the similar age as the…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The war that 9/11 spun Americans and the rest of the world into was not a regular war in a regular country with regular soldiers. This war was one in which our brave men and women took on a radical religious band of terrorists who hide in caves, hide behind women and children, and strap bombs to themselves just to harm and terrorize others. These people continue to threaten American safety and liberty each and every day and were responsible for the most bloodshed on American soil in a single act of war. These people want nothing more than to harm innocent people and their families and will stop at nothing to do so. So when these terrorists who wear no uniforms and claim no country are captured, some argue that they deserve to be treated humanely. The fact is, they have information that could save thousands of American lives. However, they are so passionate about their cause; such information is not easily obtained. Therefore, the United States has the right to torture prisoners of war (suspected terrorists) in order to acquire vital information that is required to protect our country and its citizens.…

    • 1765 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Con Torture

    • 2313 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Torture is never justified because it defies moral values of both humans and the United States. Humans have the obligation to “respect the honor and dignity of other human beings” (Fried), even if that respect and dignity is not returned. Once tactics such as torture are resorted to, which compromise the dignity of another human, the dignity of the person performing that act is also compromised (Fried). There are some things, such as torture, that should never be done simply because the right to “call ourselves decent human beings” depends on not doing them (Jacoby). If humans sink to the lowest level that is torture, the essential abilities to feel empathy, respect, and honor are lost, all core parts of humanity that separate man from all other animals. As a country, the United States also has distinct morals that hold it above resorting to torture.…

    • 2313 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arguments Against Torture

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Justifying the needs of implementing various methods of torture is strongly a recommended option to protecting America’s security and American citizens. While the debate of whether the use of torture is valid to protect the United States of America overall, supporters of the argument strongly argue that interrogating terrorists is only useful when various torture methods are involved. During one of the United States of America’s darkest periods in the nation’s history, the terrorists attack of September 11, 2001 rebooted the discussion of how various methods of torture are a justifiable means to not only place vengeance on the terrorists involved in the attacks on America’s soil. In the course of the aftermath of the horrific attacks of September 11, 2001, supporters of using various methods of torture during the interrogation process observed a central argument to prove their case. For example, if America’s security becomes unfortunately at risk of another terrorists attack, the nation could potentially protect Americans by implementing various methods of torture to only not question terrorists’ against their willpower.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Getting Away with Torture

    • 7443 Words
    • 30 Pages

    undermined one of the most basic global standards governing how governments can treat people under their control. Contrary to the efforts of…

    • 7443 Words
    • 30 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Persuasive Argument

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Let me express my opinion addressing both of these issues. Firstly, I think torturing another human being is disgusting and should never be done. However, fine lines of what is and what is not acceptable in interrogation settings is just that, a fine line. Most all released prisoners have complained about being isolated, being sleep deprived, exposed to truth drugs, beatings, locking in confined and cold cells, and being forced to maintain uncomfortable postures. While I hope never to be exposed to any of this, if I were a prisoner of war or “detainee” or whatever else, I think I would expect far worse. Yes, the United States government has denied most all accusations…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays