Preview

Summary Of David Hume's An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
500 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of David Hume's An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding
In his work, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Hume presents a skeptical solution to the problem of induction and how we draw casual inferences. He conveys that we form inferences, not from reason, but from our experiences of cause and effect derived from the principle of custom or habit. Induction occurs when we make an inference and a conclusion from our past observations. Hume states that we can go beyond our memory and senses to conclude matters of fact. By experience, rather than by reason, we use the relation of cause and effect to regard these inferences. This knowledge of causal relations is based on experience because the relation between cause and effect is distinct. We feel compelled to jump from A to B and hold no reasoning …show more content…
We remain skeptical in these solutions without giving a concrete answer to avoid error. Hume notes that there is no reason as to why we should reason with causal relations, but we do it anyway. He states that a person who enters a fresh world with no prior experience will at first once perceive random events. However, he will then begin to form correlations and will assume cause and effect relations. This portrays the customs or habits of people. Customs are sets of non-rational psychological faculties that help regulate minds. We can not reason or sense the causation to events, but by custom we can see the connection between A and B after we watch it reoccur many times. Hume conveys that "all inferences from experience, therefore, are effects of custom, not of reasoning" (Hume 28) and there is no rational connection between causal relations. Without custom, “we should be entirely ignorant of every matter of fact,” beyond your present memory and senses (Hume 29). Furthermore, simple impressions develop reasoning from experience and we form customary conjunctions between these impressions. Therefore, Hume states that custom is the great guide of human life as it connects the future with the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Why is ascribing causality more difficult when conclusions have been reached through induction? To determine why the results of a study are the way they are, the data must be fairly dependent and reliable as well as clearly formulated. If the information gathered to determine casuality is inductively derived than it is difficult to reach a definitive conclusion.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Powerful Ideas, An Introduction to Philosophy, aesthetics means "coming from the senses" which is a derivitive of the Greek word, aisthetikos (241). David Hume's believed that emotions are significant in both aesthetics and ethics. In addition, he stated that aesthetics involves both contemplation and judgment. He strongly believes that not everyone is suitable or qualify to judge art.…

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume’s version of empiricism begins with his distinction between analytic propositions “relationship of ideas,” which he considers to be a priori and true by definition, and synthetic propositions, which he considers to be a posteriori (“matters of fact”), and which are opposite of analytic propositions because they’re derived from our senses.…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Psyc 4100

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Rychlak, J. F. (1998). Is there an unrecognized teleology in Hume 's analysis of causation?. Journal Of Theoretical And Philosophical Psychology, 18(1), 52-60.…

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Locke, J. (1996). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, (First Published 1689) Abridged and Edited by Kenneth P. Winkler. Cambridge: Hackett Publishing.…

    • 2807 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    There have been a number of challenges questioning Hume’s sympathy. Some questioned the subjectivity of sympathy, since there should be an objective basis for moral evaluation, and sentiments, being the product of sympathy which is subjective to some extent, is not entirely an objective basis for moral evaluation. Some others challenged Hume with the “virtue in rags” argument, which suggests that sometimes good motives do not bring about pleasure in anyone, but we still approve of such motives, which is inexplicable by Hume’s sympathy. Another challenge is called the weak sympathy problem, which challenges Hume’s sympathy by pointing out that Hume only allows us to sympathize with others at a particular instant, and the object of sympathy is…

    • 145 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Back in Hume’s time, there were mainly three schools of thought regarding the nature of morality. This debate was initiated by Thomas Hobbes’ view that moral obligations and duties came from self-regarding motives. In response to Thomas Hobbes’ argument, there are two schools of thought, namely rationalism and sentimentalism. Rationalists such as Samuel Clarke argued that morality could be explained by pure reason , and acting morally is just the same as acting rationally. Hume is on the side of the sentimentalists, as he rejects reason as the basis of morality . Hume argues, rather, that it is our moral sentiments that serve as the basis of moral approvals and disapprovals . In Hume’s picture, each action produces certain feelings in the recipients, be it pain or pleasure, and it is through sympathizing with the recipients which we have an impression of the resulting pain or pleasure in the recipients, and thus approve of or disapprove of the active person’s character trait which led to the action.…

    • 216 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Although the “free will” problem envelops a spectrum of ideas, I agree with the following belief: “The folk are compatibilists about free will.” While there are, of course, incompatibilists and indeterminists, for the most part, the general population consists of compatibilists. Now, I know experimental philosophy has a problem with the use of generalizations without actual statistics, but throughout this paper, I will explain exactly why the world revolves in a generally compatibilist manner.…

    • 1592 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In discussing the principles from which we determine moral good or evil, virtue or vice, Hume argues that because the number of situations we may encounter is 'infinite' it would be absurd to imagine an 'original instinct' or individual principle for each possibility. (T3.1.2.6)1 Instead he suggests that, following the usual maxim of nature producing diversity from limited principles, we should look for more general principles.…

    • 1432 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    David Hume is a renowned Philosopher that has shaped the ideas of cause and effect (causality) as we know them today. He suggested that true cause and effect relationship has to be the result of A causing B. The occurrence of B happening is contingent on the fact that A occurs before B, thus causing B to happen. Since he holds that this is the only rational way to conclude that one thing causes another to happen, he goes as far as to say that human beings will never know the exact cause that takes place in order for B to be the result. Hume comes to this conclusion because he maintains that there are secrete causes that cannot be observed by the human eye, thus it is impossible for humans to rationally conclude that one thing caused another…

    • 1897 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume believes the root of morality is emotion. He believes emotions, or passions, as he calls them, are the driving force behind our actions. Hume believes that how we feel about things determines what we determine is moral or immoral. There is no logical reason for keeping one’s promises if there is no benefit to you. However, we as a people have decided that keeping one’s word is moral because we would like someone to do that for us. We keep our promises because we want people to think kindly of us. There is no logic behind it, but there is emotion. Even when there is nothing to be gained for us by keeping our promises, we still maintain its moral to keep them because of how it makes us feel. This means, even when it is illogical to do something, if we feel it is moral, we should do it. Reason is not enough to change how we behave. It can give us some direction but it cannot compel us to do…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gary Gutting, the author of the article, What Makes Free Will Free? deliberates that we do not have free choice as we assumed which a researcher confirmed. By free choice, this means the conviction that our conduct is dictated by our own unrestrained choice and that we have complete power over our activities. Also, Gary Gutting examined various thoughts on determinism as the researchers suggested. Determinism refers to the conviction that all human conduct or any other occurrences have a cause. This is opposed to a person's will to accomplish an action. Gary Gutting discussed what David Hume, a philosopher, believed and the belief of David Hume is that both determinism and free choice are possible, they are compatible with each…

    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chapters ten through twelve began to focus on why people think the way they do, as well as why one responds to questions in the manner that they do. There were two heuristics found inside of these three chapters that specifically interested me in their ties to our humanity; they were the bias of confidence over doubt and the anchoring principle.…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scientific Method

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Induction- is a logical process by which all known observations are combined and considered before producing a possible answer.…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume strongly opposes the idea that moral judgments are the conclusion of reason. The role of reason in relation to moral judgments is to be only in relation to the passions. Reason must be slave to man's passions. Reason is to help man find his moral obligations and duties, but reason does not produce or act on obligation or moral duty; man's passions motivate one to act.…

    • 1420 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays