Preview

Summary Of D Emilio

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
309 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of D Emilio
D’Emilio makes the argument that gay and lesbian identities are not fixed but have been created by society over time. He cites the rise of capitalism in America as the main element that created the circumstances for same-sex desires to form into identities. D’Emilio first explains how before the free labor market, colonial white Americans could only survive from within a family unit. Each member of the family (husband, wife or child) played a role in their survival, which meant that each family was their own independant unit (D’Emilio, pg. 469). However, the rise of capitalism took many workers (mostly men, but some women) outside the family and into the workplace. Because of this, D’Emilio argues that the family unit became less important

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Heterosexism is a term used to describe people who discriminate against gays and lesbians. Throughout history, an intimate relationship between members of the opposite sex was considered the norm, and breaking this norm would make a person deviant. From birth, children are taught certain characteristics on how boys and girls are suppose to behave. Children learn these things from their parents, the schools they attend, and society that they live in. The characteristics that they learn shapes them into what they become when they’re adults. According to Barrie Thorne, “the sociological significance of children’s play is that boys and girls are helping to socialize one another into primary adult gender roles, girls being more concerned with intimacy, emotions, and romance, and boys with independence and sexuality (pg. 180)”. As children we are taught that sex and sexuality are about becoming mommies or daddies, we then bring that knowledge into our teenage lives and eventually into adulthood. We are taught that being heterosexual is normal and homosexuality and bisexual as wrong and out of the norm. Although heterosexuality dates all the way back to the days of Adam and Eve, the term didn’t come into effect until the late nineteenth century. The purpose of this paper is to give examples of how heterosexism has become institutionalized in the American social system.…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first category discusses how absurd it is to assume that if gay marriage was legalized then eventually polygamy, incestuous, and even pedophiliac marriages would all have to be legalized. In the second category it is a reminder that the slopes can slip in more direction, so their theory could back fire and the slope could slip into more support for not only the LGBT community, but also for those who are mentally handicapped and those with sexually transmitted diseases. As the third category states slippery slopes in general are a bad idea and are illogical and the fourth category recognizes that states, “in addition to the aforementioned reasons, a distinction between gay marriages and polygamous and incestuous marriages can be made based on the concept of “choice.” This fallacy is extremely weak in any sort of intellectual debate because the tactic of it is to fly off into a many other situations that are, more often than not, ridiculous and do not usually relate specifically to the “top of the slope” issue, and this essay is a good argument showing the flaws in the slippery slope argument against legalizing gay marriage.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Timm And Sanborn Analysis

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Timm and Sanborn introduce the idea of transforming family structure and gender roles through industrialization. Less earned-wage made women relying on men’s support (Timm and Sanborn 65). However, in bourgeois society, women of leisure in another way became an indication of separating middle-class and working class (Timm and Sanborn, 75). The authors then discuss the development of urbanization creating a space for gathering of homosexuals, thus sexual sins attracted scholars’ attentions.…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    At the beginning of the essay Neil explains the social changes that have occurred in the last few decades showing the stark rise of “unmarried –partner households.” He claims that…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    “The nuclear family is a partnership between a male and female who are both sexually and socially benefitted by the association. The essential and fundamental pillar that differentiates the heterosexual relationship from the nuclear family is love. The empowering emotion of love leads the couple to attain the benefits of reproduction, enjoyment, and protection.” The nuclear family, a recently developed relationship, was greatly overshadowed by the lover boyfriend, homosexual, relationship for some time. While the men in The Symposium promoted the lover boyfriend relationship, they did remain involved in heterosexual relationships. However, these heterosexual relationships did not embody the characteristics of the nuclear family De Waal discusses. The key difference between the heterosexual relationship and the nuclear family is females’ inferiority and trivial role to males. “The men did not view the relationship as intellectually beneficial or challenging enough for the male to associate this relationship with love. The relationship was purely sexually driven.” The heterosexual relationship has revolutionized into the nuclear family. The most common and idealized relationship by the majority of human beings, the nuclear family is advantageous and salient to modern…

    • 1839 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Blackrock by Nick Enright

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The impact of difference that is revealed in nick Enright’s text ‘Blackrock’ and Ed Fischer’s ‘go to the closet’ is that gender difference and those who are of different belief can majorly impact a group/individual severely. In particular being a female in a young male’s society, or having the belief that homosexuality is acceptable in society.…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In "Why the M Word Matters to Me" (Time Magazine, 02/08/04), Andrew Sullivan describes the troubles in his life that he encountered as a gay man. At first, he grew up in a traditional and conservative home. As he grew order, he realized something different between him and his peers did for girls. But no one explained it to him. Gradually, he became isolated and he felt that he would never be a part of his family. A few years later, he realized that he was gay, and his friends had found out that. However, when people talk about gay marriage, they miss the point. Andrew thinks people have gone into the wrong direction. He appeals gay people should not need to feel isolation. On the contrary, they should entitle equal right and get marriage.…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the years pass, fewer people discriminate, but there are still many that still do, causing others to “half express [themselves]” (186). Gays and lesbians are afraid to come out of the closet because they were told that it wasn’t right to be anything but straight. Society made them feel ashamed of themselves. They might give off hints and their friends might be able to tell, but they would never actually come out. If individualism was stressed more, gays or lesbians would no longer need to hide who they truly are. Even worse, proposition 8 restricts the definition of marriage to opposite-sex couples only. They would be accepted, but as of now, they are not because there is not enough emphasis on individualism.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Andrew Delbanco's article, "Three Reasons College Still Matters" which first appeared in Parade magazine, Delbanco legitimized a case for obtaining a college degree using three main perspectives: an economic one, a political one, and an intellectual one.…

    • 535 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Marvin Harris’s work Why Nothing Works: An Anthropologist Looks at American Culture he argues that the underlying changes in the American economy since the 1950s have changed the nature of marriage, the nuclear family and sexuality in the United States. Throughout, this paper I will be analyzing Harris’s theory as well as stating my own personal beliefs from the experiences I have with each topic.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Homosexuality Analysis

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This alteration continues present. Why do viewpoints of people change ? According to Giddens, sexual development and sexual satisfaction henceforth became bound to the reflexive project of the self (1991,164) (Gauntlett, 2008, p.110). Another arguement of Giddens; once sex was seperated from reproduction, sexual plesure and variety could come to the fore. Meantime contraception had a direct influence on heterosexuality, it had knock-on homosexual relation and sexuality, as the idea of sexual pleasure in society became more open and less riddled with apprehension. Also, although in traditional socities the substantial function of reproduction was surely focused on heterosexual couples, in more modern times, once reproduction had come under human control, heterosexuality lost its supremacy (Gauntlett, 2008, p.116). Finally according to PewResearch Center’s survey; among young people in specific, there is broad support for social acceptence of homosexuality. More than six-in-ten (63%) of those young than 50- 69% of those younger than 30- say that homosexuallity should be accepted. But acceptence of homosexuality is 52% of those older than 50. Therefore the acceptence of homosexuality will increase in the…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Article Rebuttal

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The article I decided to do is from the New York Daily News. It is on the topic of Gay Marriage and its title is “Five arguments against gay marriage: Society must brace for corrosive change.” In this article there are different areas of concern that the author talks about. One is religious freedom. The Author Wrote “A recent Newsday editorial said opponents “will be seen by future generations in much the same light as those who opposed school desegregation. Devout Catholics, Orthodox Jews and, ironically, the 70% of African-Americans who oppose gay marriage will become the new Ku Klux Klan?” (Forman, 2011) I disagree with this, there is no such thing as traditional marriage. Given the prevalence of modern and ancient examples of family arrangements based on polygamy, communal child-rearing, the use of concubines and mistresses and the commonality of prostitution, heterosexual monogamy can be considered "unnatural” in evolutionary terms. (Pro & Con Arguments: "Should gay marriage be legal?" 2011) The second argument is the Rights of Children. In the article the author says “More children living in gay homes means more children living lives absent a relationship with at least one biological parent. This will result in some emotional pain and confusion”. A study published in Pediatrics on June 7, 2010 found that children of lesbian mothers were rated higher than children of heterosexual parents in social and academic competence and had fewer social problems. And a July 2010 study found that children of gay fathers were "as well-adjusted as those adopted by heterosexual parents.” (Pro & Con Arguments: "Should gay marriage be legal?" 2011).The third argument concerns traditional marriage. “Eliminating the complementarily of the sexes in marriage changes its essence. It may be old-fashioned to believe women are still necessary to domesticate sexually predatory men. But…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Marriage and Individuals

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Both authors have some similar perspectives on the same sex marriage topic; one of them being sociological views and the matter of same-sex couples. In addition, both Evan and Andrew believe that family and friends who support and understand gay couples have a major positive on same sex marriage. Both authors discussed that many gay or lesbian children are being raised in a non-gay environment and that has a negative impact on the lives of children. The differences between Wolfson and Sullivan’s viewpoints are that Sullivan emphasizes the individual citizen, and Wolfson emphasize the importance of same-sex marriage. Some people are still ignoring the fact that our society is changing and evolving rapidly. Same-sex couples have been suppressing their voices throughout many decades, and now they are ready to fight for their freedom and the right to be married.…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Despite our country’s youth, the United States has continued time and time again to erase the boundaries of social inequality so that we may progress forward in hopes of establishing the more perfect union our preamble suggests. Although not always the popular modus, Americans push and fight for the general welfare of those who fall subject to prejudice and hate; many times, we have succeeded while some injustices continue to be fought. What was once a country that enslaved and tormented the African race is now a country that opens its homes and schools to members of all cultures. What was once a patriarchal hierarchy that subjugated the voice of women is now a country that appoints females to the high offices of government and business. What were once few colonies that segregated immigrants into separate provinces is now a giant fifty-state melting pot of patriotism, diversity, and opportunity. If history continues to follow this cyclical pattern, it seems promising, then, that the national acceptance of marriage equality is on the horizon. However, we exist in a day and age (as many Americans have before us) where such a promise is not possible, at least not yet. In Jonathan Rauch’s “For Better or Worse,” he attempts to persuade his readers to favor gay marriage by reevaluating and tearing apart the controversial notions from which it’s oppressors build their foundation. Notwithstanding the position Rauch takes a stance for, his criteria and opinionated basis for the concept of marriage fails to deliver any hope in persuading a reader in becoming more favorable for gay marriage.…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are many controversies surrounding today's world, such as abortion, animal testing, and social reform issues. It seems that no one can come to a common agreement on the legitimacy of these topics. Personal characteristics, such as upbringing, culture, religion and ethnicity, all play a role in determining one's feelings on a given controversial issue. However, one of the most protested and discussed issues in current political debate is same-sex marriage. There is no right or wrong answer to this question, only hard pressed arguments expressing speculation regarding supposed outcomes, benefits and possible tribulations that would come along with the endorsement of gay marriage. Such ideas are shown in pieces of writing by Manuel A. Lopez, in "The Case Against Gay Marriage" and by Scott Bidstrup in " Gay Marriage: The Arguments and Motives." These issues both discuss and contend common controversy surrounding the gay marriage debate. After reading and analyzing each essay, it is observed that Manuel A. Lopez' style of writing and literary tone give him the upper hand in establishing a more effective piece.…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays