Summary Of Cathy Newman And Jordan Peterson

There was a recent interview with British presenter Cathy Newman and Jordan Peterson that took place on the Channel 4 News. Newman took quotes from Peterson’s new Book “12 Rules For Life” for a basis of the conversation that they could talk about throughout the interview. This is perfectly fine but the way Cathy Newman uses language is not close to a formal interview but rather to attack Peterson without any logical reason. Gender was the main point of discussion throughout this interview. The first opening questions that was said in the interview was “Jordan Peterson, you’ve said that men need to, quote, ‘grow the hell up.’ Tell me why.”. This then led to future discussions between the Gender Pay Gap, Relationships, Women running companies
It is all a matter of opinion. She was clearly on a rampage to make him look bad but instead ended up making her look utterly stupid. Peterson starts off the interview by saying what is needed to “grow up” - his points being fair that you need to “adopt responsibility” and that they have “something to offer”. Newman's language that she believes are questions but are actually counter-arguments are opposing his reasoning and research with very straightforward accusations forgetting that Peterson is a “Clinical Psychologist”. Newman then changes Peterson’s answers to the way how Newman wants to understand it, by being very straightforward with no logical reason. Peterson uses the word “unhappy” in his response but Newman interprets the word a lot more different to what he meant. Peterson, later on, gives a very deep comparison of human beings and lobsters in an analysis of lobster hardwired biology that provides the social evolutionary hierarchy. Newman then asks absurd questions "So you think we should structure our society like lobsters." which is just an embarrassing low-grade question as if Newman did not even bother to listen or could not comprehend the
Peterson says a statement, then Newman misinterprets Peterson's statement, Newman then explains her interpretation, Peterson then corrects Newman and explains his statement and summarizes his explanation in a statement then just keeps looping. This shows how Newman does not understand the language that Peterson is trying to get across. Newman bombards Peterson with accusations and hardly lets him talk, she cuts him from communicating his idea which is some sort of mechanism to not make her open-minded. For example, some words such as ‘nigger’ or ‘faggot’ are sadly associated with insults that us humans have given so much power. People like Newman get triggered by the topic ‘Gender’ which makes them subjects towards these