Preview

Summary Of Animal Liberation By Peter Singer

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
739 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of Animal Liberation By Peter Singer
In the article, “Animal Liberation” the author Peter Singer discusses the issue of physical and emotional suffering that is being endured by animals. The basis and summary of “Animal liberation” is that we are constantly inflicting pain and misery upon animals and it is morally incorrect. The criteria for fairness is, if a living organism has the capacity for suffering then they should be treated the same way psychologically, mentally and emotionally. If the answer to the capacity of suffering is yes, then we cannot do anything to them. Humans should show genuine empathy towards other beings on the planet, especially animals. Animals feel and experience pain the same way a human being endures pain and suffering. We should not mistreat them, just because they are not able to reason or think intellectually. They have the right to be here. Singer came up with the concept of “speciesism” which is primarily the prejudice and bias notion of human superiority leading to the exploitation of animals. In the end the moral status of animals is being put to question. Are they on the level of people, property, or pets? Most would not put animals in the same category as humans so giving them the same rights seem ridiculous. Humans are the alpha species; animals do not have our …show more content…
For example, giving up your seat on the bus for an injured or elderly person or even giving money to the homeless or buying he/she something to eat is not important to many, since they rather engage in other senseless activities and ignore the fact that doing good for others is actually a real life notion that exists. Many living beings do not have compassion for other people, so why would they have compassion for animals and they suffering they tolerate? Compassion is having empathy, care, thoughtfulness and consideration for others, but many individuals do not possess those qualities, majority of them are selfish and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Animals deserve rights because just like humans, they feel excruciating pain, suffer and have feelings. One would argue that animals don’t experience emotions? But the answer is of course they do. It is emotions that allow animals to display various behavior patterns. According to the theory of utilitarianism, all sentient beings should be given consideration in the society and this includes both animals and humans. Also, animals cannot speak for themselves and for this reason they should be treated equally, protected and given the same respect as human beings. Peter singer’s approach also supports the argument on equal consideration in that animals deserve the same respect as human beings but just in a different view. In today’s society humans exploit animals for milk, meat, fur, scientific experimentation etc. and animals are constantly injured or killed. Their pain and sufferings should be taken into consideration, as this unjust treatment is morally unacceptable. Similarly speciesism is an…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After reading “A Change of Heart about Animals”, Jeremy Rifkins argues that animals should be treated in a more humane way. I agree with Rifkins argument because I have seen animals get abuse and it should not be like that. People may say that they do not feel anything but THEY DO! It’s similar to when a humane it getting abused. Many researchers are finding that the animals are similar to us in many ways: they feel pain, suffer, and experience stress, affection, excitement, and even love. Rifkins give scientific evidence to support his argument from credible source and make his stronger.…

    • 190 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Determining the rights of non-human animals and deciding how to treat them may not be a choice available to our human society. As an advocate for the rights of animals, Tom Reganʻs three main goals are to abandon the use of animals in any scientific research, discontinue all commercial animal agriculture, and to completely terminate both commercial and sport animal hunting. To support these intentions, Regan argues that every human and non-human animal possesses inherent value, which makes them all more than a physical object or vessel. He then states that possessing inherent value allows every human and non-human to have rights of their own. To further his argument, Regan claims that the any human and non-human retaining rights requires equal treatment and respect from others. To conclude his argument, Regan states that due to these reasons, non-human animals cannot be treated as resources and must be treated by humans as equals. In this paper, I object to Reganʻs third premise, which states that non-human and human animals must be treated as equals and with respect, because our communication barrier with non-human animals restricts us from determining their notion of equal treatment or respect, and that attempting to do so could…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animals and humans were created to coexist on this earth and therefore should receive fair treatment. Many cannot fathom the idea of initiating legal rights for animals. Some may even perceive it as absurd to dedicate and focus time on non-human animals. The main problem is that humans have advanced significantly, establishing a complex intellect that other species lack. Humans possess many capabilities that are distinct from those of others.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Your newspaper published an editorial “A Change of Heart about Animals” September 1, 2003 by Jeremy Rifkin, author and president of the Foundation on Economic Trends, in which Rifkin suggests that the center of the human experience is about extending concern to wider and wider realms to the species we share the world with (34). He implies throughout the article that animals like us, feel pain, experience stress, affection, excitement, and even love (33) . He claims that animals should be treated better because they experience similar emotions we do. By focusing on the ideal of extending the amount of empathy we give to animals, Jeremy Rifkin overlooks the deeper issue of how these creatures of the world feel about us because he does not consider that like them, we…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Indeed, Raising the issues of animal welfare is impossible to develop clear guidelines to judge by. On the article “Hooked on a Myth” states “we should adopt a precautionary ethical approach and assume that in the absence of evidence to the contrary fish suffer.” However the principle is no different between men and animal. Working out animal freedom in an actual practice that gain the concerns and role of ethics. Animals should be treated with compassion and grateful. A right…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Peter Singer Argument

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages

    2. In “Animal Liberation”, Peter Singer argues that human suffering and animal suffering should be given equal consideration. He believes that a lot of our modern practices are speciesist, and that they hold our best interest above all else. The only animals that we give equal consideration are humans. He questions our reasonings for giving equal consideration to all members to our species, because, some people are more superior than others, in terms of intelligence or physical strength. Humans value themselves over…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    It gives basic moral significance to things that are able to experience pain and pleasure. Human’s and non humans can most certainly experience pain and pleasure therefore we all deserve equality. Singer argues that we have a direct duty to animals, to include their interest in our moral reasoning. Whether or not animals can author treatises on mathematics they like us feel pain and we therefore have an obligation not to cause them needless suffering. Singer denounces all forms of what he calls “speciesism” whereby human beings believe they can exploit animals merely because they do not belong to the species homo sapiens. Just because animals aren’t homo sapiens doesn’t mean they are not equal. They have hearts, they pump blood, they breathe and they create life, these are all qualities us humans…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Secondly, Rifkin’s arguments against animal experimentation are supported by scientific studies conducted through the very same animal experimentation. From the laboratory crows to the gorilla learner, to the imprisoned orangutan, Rifkin seems to support animal abuse only when he benefits from it. I understand the concern for treating animals humanely but as shown through Rifken’s use of evidence, sometimes experimentation outweighs comfort purely in the scientific strides it creates for humans and animals.…

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people believe that animals have feelings and that they are able to feel what a human feels such love, suffering, stress even some people think that we share similar characteristics. in the article "A Change of Heart About Animals '' the author Jeremy Rifkin argument that animals are the same as human beings and that we should also treat them with love and respect. For some reasons, activists and some law schools believe in animals rights and they want to protect animals but if there were a bill of rights for animals some certain things would change for a reason some would not be benefit from this. Pass a bill of right it is not a good idea because it would change many things.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Background: An Organization called the Animal Legal Defense Fund has sponsored a petition that calls for increased protection for the rights of animals. It says the following:…

    • 409 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this paper I am going to argue that Singer is right to claim that human suffering and animal suffering should be given equal consideration. I believe that animals have the capacity to suffer, as human do there is no difference in suffering because we are of different species. Whether we are humans are non-humans we have the capacity to feel pain.…

    • 1457 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lechi Sun ENVS 345 Assignment 1 10/10/2014 According to Singer’s points of view, we should expand the meaning of the equality, animals should be included in the rights of equality. Non-human animals deserve the same consideration as humans because they can suffer. Animals can feel pleasure and pain as well. Although animals and human are basically different, actually, everything on this planet is different, however, what we need to do is that we need the equal consideration on everything.…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Singer's Utilitarianism does give some sense of moral equality between humans and animals. He felt that animals have identical interests that are equally morally important as humans and that they must be treated with equal concern. Singer says: "Speciesism. . . the belief that we are entitled to treat members of other species in a way in which it would be wrong to treat members of our own…

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Animal Abuse Wrong

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages

    An animal is a living being that feels pain just like we do. A society that tolerates animal cruelty may as well tolerate cruelty against humans. “Animals obviously cannot have a right of free speech or a right to vote because they lack the relevant…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays