Preview

Summary Of A Defense Of Abortion By Judith Jarvis

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
147 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of A Defense Of Abortion By Judith Jarvis
My reaction after reading the Judith Jarvis’ “A Defense of Abortion”: The Violinist analogy was how bizarre the story is. She is giving a scenario where a well know violinist is attached to you against your will and you are obligated to keep him alive for nine months. Initially, I interpreted the story as the moral duty to keep the violinist alive in the same manner as anti-abortion and pro-life views. I understand that there are certain moral obligations that we have to abide by, but there are certain situations I feel that abortion is permissible. However, after reviewing the notes there was more clarity. In fact, this situation signifies the weaknesses in the premises for abortion making the entire statement false. I can see both sides

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In “Why abortion is immoral,” by Don Marquis, Marquis sets out an argument that abortion is “seriously immoral that it is in the same moral category as killing an innocent adult human being.” Marquis first wants us to understand why killing a person is wrong. He presents us with an argument that the loss of one’s life is one of the greatest losses one can suffer. Because this prevents a person from having a valuable human future, a future like ours. What makes killing any adult human being wrong? If a person is killed all the experience, activities, projects, and enjoyment would be deprive from a person future. Therefore, Marquis believe that killing is one of the worst of crimes because their future is taken away along with their life.…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to write this report accordingly, three internet sources and one book source have been used.…

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The goal of Judith Jarvis Thomson in her defense of abortion is to sway the ideas of those who are against abortion by challenging the arguments they give for thinking so. She begins by stating a premise. “For the sake of the argument” a human embryo is a person. This premise is one of the arguments most opponents of abortion use, but as she points out, isn’t much of an argument at all. These people spend a lot of their time dwelling on the fact that the fetus is a person and hardly any time explaining how the fetus being a person has anything to with abortion being impermissible. In the same breath, she states that those who agree with abortion spend a lot of their time saying the fetus is in fact not a person. Either way, no argument is really formed. No reasons are given. For sake of challenging an actual argument, she is disregarding this issue. With this premise out of the way, she addresses the basic argument the pro-choice campaign believes. “Every person has a right to life. So the fetus has a right to life. No doubt the mother has a right to decide what shall happen in and to her body; everyone would grant that. But surely a person’s right to life is stronger and more stringent than the mother’s right to decide what happens in and to her body, and so outweighs it. So the fetus may not be killed; an abortion may not be performed.” The remainder of her paper is a series of analogies meant to challenge the basic argument mention above. When looking at the analogies separately, they are in no way related to the abortion topic, but the conclusions drawn from each can be applied. Because these examples aren’t directly related to the debate, our emotions won’t necessarily be involved and we can clearly think about what is the “right” thing to do for each specific scenario.…

    • 1957 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Don Marquis believed that abortion was impermissible. He wrote a paper titled Why Abortion is Immoral which he argues about how abortion is seriously immoral and is in the same category as killing an innocent adult human being. Marquis’s arguments are the opposite of what it is that I am arguing. Marquis believes that a fetus is a person, so a fetus has a right to life. He believes that unless it is extreme circumstances it is immoral to kill a normal adult human because it causes “the loss to the victim of the value of its future” (Marquis, 192) and this is the equivalent to what happens when someone has an abortion.…

    • 218 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    After reading “A defense of Abortion” by Judith Jarvis Thomson and what he had to say with his violinist analogy involving the kidney replacement. I agree with what he has to say on not only abortion itself but, whether or not a fetus should have the right to the women’s body. I don’t think that the fetus should be given the right to use the women’s body because what if she does not what to have a baby and ends up getting pregnant anyway. Also, each time a woman engages in sexual intercourse, she is not inviting the fetus to live inside her body. This is why birth control and other contraceptives are not a sure deal when dealing with sexual intercourse. What if the birth control method fails and the women end's up getting pregnant? She did…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Abortion has always been a controversial topic in America. People have been separated into “pro life” and “pro choice” groups who support completely opposite topics. In “When Abortion Suddenly Stopped Making Sense”, Frederica Mathewes-Green successfully persuades readers why she is against abortion by utilizing personal anecdotes when switching from pro choice to pro life, alarming statistics and exposing a baby’s humanity using sympathetic language.…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    She doesn’t think that the fetus is in fact morally human, but for the sake of the argument accepts this principle. She then comes up with her own version of the Pro-Life view. She temporally goes along with the argument that the fetus is a human and that it has a right to live, but then she argues that a woman has a right to decide on whatever she wants to have happen to her body (this would be the controversy to this theory) but still the fetus has a better propriety than the mother because the right to life is more important than any non-tangible options. Therefore, the fetus cannot be killed. She then gives a very extreme example known as “The Violin Player Analogy”. Here, this states that theoretically an individual goes to a concert and suddenly this individual blacks-out because somebody shoots them with a tranquillizer gun, or something similar. The individual wakes up connected to the musician that they went to see. The individual must then stay connected to this musician for nine months to keep them alive until a transplant could come in. Here, she reaches the argument that most would say it is okay to just get up and leave. She explains that the individual is like a mother and that a fetus needs the mother to survive like the violin player, therefore if the mother does not want to let someone use her body for nine months, she does not have to let the fetus use…

    • 1859 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jonathan Glover, in his article Matters of Life and Death casts dispersions on both pro-abortion and anti-abortion debates citing them as too knee-jerk emotional reactions diminishing the inherent complexity of the other side (1. Glover, CC2006, p. 0110). Glover comprehensively addresses the key points of both sides of the abortion debate and evaluates their inherent virtues, especially for those who hold these opinions, then methodically points out its flaws. Ultimately, Glover comes to the conclusion that though a fetus is a human at the moment of conception, the right to abort lies with the mother and her own self-determination.…

    • 1982 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is only once the determination is made that it can be purported that any moral characteristic can yield a preponderance of evidence that there is any obligation or lack thereof as it pertains to a life (of a fetus) being saved. Marquis exclaimed that while, both the anti-abortionist and pro-choicers claims do seem to be accurate and true, being that "it looks like a baby" claim sets forth a more difficult fact to establish earlier in the pregnancy, this is where he (Marquis) believed it led to a standoff. He asserted that anti-abortionist contentions tend to be far too broad with “boundaries” in regards to what qualifies as a human life, and thus allows for the interpretation that eradication of any human cell is morally questionable/wrong. In contrast the pro-choicer Marquis argues establishes “qualifications” for human life that are for too specific (narrowed down) and thus does not account the immorality of killing infants and/or…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Abortion EssayWK1 FINAL2815

    • 2949 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Today in our society abortion remains one of the most controversial topics. There are many people who believe that it is unethical and even thought of as murder.1 Abortion is a medical procedure used to end a pregnancy and cause the death of a fetus. People who think women should not have this procedure are Pro-Life. In the majority of cases adult women and teenagers choose whether or not, when having intercourse to protect themselves. Some feel this is the point when women have a choice, not after a life has been formed. They believe in the right to life.…

    • 2949 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Abortion Ethics Paper

    • 554 Words
    • 2 Pages

    P2: The mother has a right to defend herself against the unborn’s use of her body…

    • 554 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Death is morally wrong according to American ethics and values so is the killing of unborn fetuses morally wrong as well? A fetus is considered a human life because life begins at the moment of conception. Abortions are painful, inhumane, and dangerous for the child, the mother, and the mother 's health. Women should not have an abortion because it is an act of taking human life, can result in medical complications later in life, and to complete the process the mother and her baby must go through horrific procedures.…

    • 2388 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dine, Ranana. “Scarlet Letters: Getting the History of Abortion and Contraception Right.” 13 August 2013. Americanprogress.org…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Abortion has always struck an uncommon ground between people, especially when rape or contraceptive failure is the reason for the abortion. Judith Thompson starts by explaining the Violinist argument. The argument is something like this; you wake up in the morning and you find yourself back to back with an unconscious, world famous violinist. The Violinist, come to find out, has a rare kidney disease that can be fatal if he doesn’t have a donor with the same blood type. The Society of Music Lovers looked everywhere for someone with the same blood type, and found that you were the only compatible donor in the…

    • 1756 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Personally, I think that any form of abortion is tantamount to murder, and should never be permitted. This article only brings to my attention that women who wish to have abortions are only concerned for themselves, as the argument is based upon the health of the woman. Although the author’s argument may be valid concerning some facets of the issue, I believe the focus of the subject should shift from the mother to the living creature inside and its right to…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays