Summary: Five Sentences On The Big Picture
5 Sentences on the Big Picture
• I think that the author wants you to remember or provides you, the foundation of a theory that allows treatment of corporations as members of the moral community, of equal standing with the traditionally acknowledged residents: biological human beings, and hence treats Wicker-type responsibility ascriptions as unexceptionable instances of a perfectly proper sort without having to paraphrase them.
• In my view the author’s thesis is that corporations can be full-fledged moral people and have whatever privileges, rights and duties as are, in the normal course of affairs, accorded to moral persons. In other words corporations can be treated like a human beings.
• I disagree with the idea that a corporation can be treated like a moral person, because it not has the ability to …show more content…
• The first-type pins responsibility on someone or something, the who-dun-it or what-dun-it sense.
• The second-type of responsibility ascription, parasitic upon the first, involves the notion of accountability. "Having a responsibility" is interwoven with the notion "Having a liability to answer,"
• Responsibility types: there are two different types of responsibility: one of then is a the responsibly of required or expect to do something. The second type of responsibility is when you should do something because it is morally right. 2 Connections: Think of two connections that you made to the reading and write three to five sentences about each.
• This article reminds me, the topics that we already discussed in class, if a company can be treated as a moral person or not.
• No, I have not experienced something relate about this article, but it is going to be useful in my future life.
1 Question: What is a moral person for
• I think that the author wants you to remember or provides you, the foundation of a theory that allows treatment of corporations as members of the moral community, of equal standing with the traditionally acknowledged residents: biological human beings, and hence treats Wicker-type responsibility ascriptions as unexceptionable instances of a perfectly proper sort without having to paraphrase them.
• In my view the author’s thesis is that corporations can be full-fledged moral people and have whatever privileges, rights and duties as are, in the normal course of affairs, accorded to moral persons. In other words corporations can be treated like a human beings.
• I disagree with the idea that a corporation can be treated like a moral person, because it not has the ability to …show more content…
• The first-type pins responsibility on someone or something, the who-dun-it or what-dun-it sense.
• The second-type of responsibility ascription, parasitic upon the first, involves the notion of accountability. "Having a responsibility" is interwoven with the notion "Having a liability to answer,"
• Responsibility types: there are two different types of responsibility: one of then is a the responsibly of required or expect to do something. The second type of responsibility is when you should do something because it is morally right. 2 Connections: Think of two connections that you made to the reading and write three to five sentences about each.
• This article reminds me, the topics that we already discussed in class, if a company can be treated as a moral person or not.
• No, I have not experienced something relate about this article, but it is going to be useful in my future life.
1 Question: What is a moral person for