Preview

A summary of "Discourse on the Method" by Rene Descartes.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
764 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A summary of "Discourse on the Method" by Rene Descartes.
Discourse on the Method is Descartes' attempt to explain his method of reasoning through even the most difficult of problems. He illustrates the development of this method through brief autobiographical sketches interspersed with philosophical arguments.

Part 1 contains "various considerations concerning the sciences." First, all people possess "good sense," the ability to distinguish truth from fiction. Therefore, it is not a lack of ability that obstructs people but their failure to follow the correct path of thought. The use of a method can elevate an average mind above the rest, and Descartes considered himself a typical thinker improved by the use of his method. Descartes benefited from a superior education, but he believed that book learning also clouded his mind. After leaving school, he set off traveling to learn from "the great book of the world" with an unclouded mind. He comes to the conclusion that all people have a "natural light" that can be obscured by education and that it is as important to study oneself as it is to study the world.

In part 2, Descartes describes his revelation in the "stove-heated room." Contemplating various subjects, he hits on the idea that the works of individuals are superior to those conceived by committee because an individual's work follows one plan, with all elements working toward the same end. He considers that the science he learned as a boy is likely flawed because it consists of the ideas of many different men from various eras. Keeping in mind what he has learned of logic, geometry, and algebra, he sets down the following rules: (1) to never believe anything unless he can prove it himself; (2) to reduce every problem to its simplest parts; (3) to always be orderly in his thoughts and proceed from the simplest part to the most difficult; and (4) to always, when solving a problem, create a long chain of reasoning and leave nothing out. He immediately finds this method effective in solving problems that he had

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    hum 112 assigment 1

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I think the topic that I select is very interesting but I think is a little bit controversial because this writer includes God in his Discourse of the Method. The way that Descartes started this passage made me think that he relies on his own understanding including that he was really confused about his existence, where his thoughts and ideas came from this part was very surprise to me. The first point when I get surprise was when he said that he decided to pretend that every thought he had, were no more true, than the illusions and dreams he always had. Being a person that believes in God. For this reason I put in the beginning of the paragraph that this topic is a little bit controversial. Then to my surprise, he came to realize that the ideas put in him were by something greater than him. He said that the thing greater than him is God. Another statement that took me by surprise was when he stated that God was in us.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Scientific method, created from the ideas of Bacon and Descartes, produced a new perspective to observe the world around you from and encouraged deductive reasoning and empiricism, which led to improved technology and eventual improvement of the state. Sir Francis Bacon was one of the first to formalize the empirical method. Rather than blindly trusting the church or logic, Bacons new method advocated for validity through experimentation. Though this meant that many Aristolean scientific law could be disproved putting the church at wrong, the method was accepted within the realms of enlightened despots countries. Descartes was the first to advocate for deductive reasoning. Throughout the centuries, inductive reasoning or trust within the church were the means of reason. Descartes opposed this with his Discourse on a Method were he described and showed the advantages of skepticism and therefore advocating deductive reasoning. Descartes also discusses the “Cartesian Dualism” which justified his work with deductive reasoning. The Cartesian Dualism stated…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cited: Descartes, Rene. "Discourse on Method." The Online Literature Library. Knowledge Matters Ltd., n.d. Web. 30 Nov. 2012.…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    "Give a detailed account of Descartes ' systematic doubt or methodical doubt in Meditation 1, making it certain that you distinguish between real doubts and so called hypothetical/metaphysical doubts. Then, explain in detail, exactly how Descartes dispels each and every one of these doubts during the course of the subsequent Meditations beginning with the cogito. Do you think that Descartes has been completely successful? Explain."The main goal of Descartes in Meditations on First Philosophy was to find truth behind all of his beliefs in order to build a solid foundation of certainty, and to focus his beliefs strictly on his idea of certainty; essentially to question knowledge. Descartes beliefs are mainly based on the theory that, if someone thinks that they really know something, they must be correct. Descartes meditations bring…

    • 3392 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    SKEPTICISM

    • 839 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Descartes lived during a very skeptical period, at a time before science as we know it existed, and after a long period of relative stagnation in philosophical thought during the Church-dominated and Aristotle-influenced late Middle Ages. He had been impressed, in both his academic work and in his experience of the world at large, by the realization that there appeared to be no certain way of acquiring knowledge, and he saw his main task as the epistemological one of establishing what might be certain knowledge as a stepping stone towards the ultimate pursuit of truth. His more immediate aim in this was to put scientific enquiry in a position where it was no longer subject to attack by Skeptics, and he tried to do this by a kind of…

    • 839 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Philosophy Study Guide

    • 1821 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The aim of Descartes’ first meditation is to first rid the mind of opinion and to only believe what is true. The second goal of his is to begin to put sciences on a firm foundation. He plans on achieving these goals by using a methodological doubt process in which he will see if he can discover a basis or corrosive agent that can bring all his beliefs into doubt. He believes that once a belief can be doubted, all…

    • 1821 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The first premise is Descartes brings into this argument is that he can only know something about the external world, arithmetic, and geometry only if he can know that there is not an evil spirit deceiving him (Meditations, pg. 15-16). In other words, Descartes is trying to get at the fact that this so to say God is giving him false perception of the external world, and deceiving him in what he thought he knew was certain. Descartes conception of knowledge is broken into different parts one being truths that can only be known by reason alone, also those that are not known by reason alone, and the other is the empirical part in the natural sciences (Ludwig, 2017).…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes Beliefs

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages

    If everyone was able to understand that part of Descartes’ knowledge, the world would be a much better…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Descartes, R, Murdoch, D. & Cottingham, J.The philosophical writings of Descartes, Volume 2. Reprint. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    After his disillusion with education, Descartes traveled the world and closely observed everything he saw. On his reasoning for this, he wrote what I argue to be as close a definition as one can reach for what it means to be a healthy, growing human. His reason for traveling the world came down to his theory that he could “encounter much more truth in the reasonings that each man makes about the affairs that concern him, and whose outcome must punish him immediately afterward if he has judged badly” (Descartes 84). This is the definition of the short-term evolutionary process that defines and advances the human race; we innovate- if we succeed, we are rewarded, if we fail, we are punished. This is in exact parallel with the natural form of…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    For instance, Augustine is attacking the Academics' suspension of judgment, and argues that you cannot suspend judgment about whether you are in fact in doubt. Descartes, by contrast, is trying to establish an axiom – namely his own existence – through the method of seeing what propositions cannot be doubted (because doubting them is incoherent). Furthermore, Augustine asserts that humans can obtain knowledge by turning inwards, towards an inner standard of truth. Through an act of self-reflection, individuals can reach the irrefutable conclusion that he or she exists. A conclusion with which Descartes agrees, though, Augustine and Descartes build different arguments from this mutually agreed upon premise. For instance, Augustine argues: “For he who says: ‘I know that I live,’ says that he knows one thing; if he were then to say: ‘I know that I know that I live,’ there are already two things, but that he knows these two, is to know a third thing; and so he can add a fourth and a fifth, and innumerable more, as long as he is able to do so” (Augustine, Handout). This shows that absolute knowledge is attainable for human beings, which serves as a refutation to the Academics’ argument. On the other hand, for Descartes, the end-goal was a lasting and comprehensive system of knowledge; but his immediate task was to establish whether or not it is even possible to obtain knowledge. What Descartes wanted to be able to show, beyond all further doubt, was that truth is possible; not that it is impossible. For Descartes, if knowledge of truth is obtainable, then it must be recognizably so, for otherwise he cannot know whether he knows, or whether he does not know. According to Descartes, one cannot know something and doubt it at the same time. If at any time one knows, then one cannot doubt, and if at any time one doubts, then one cannot know. The one fact that Descartes…

    • 1608 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Descartes now that he has found knowledge that he exists as a thinking thing, he starts looking around for more of these things called self-evident truths. He tries to unravel the facts of nature in his mind by trying to find a solution and proving the existence of God. By proving that God is the one that gives us a clear and different perception which means, that God is perfect in every way and the he does not deceive anyone. Because of this he is able to secure a sense of certainty for these clear and distinct perceptions, therefore he is setting out to prove that God exists. He gives two arguments for the existence of God.…

    • 1837 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dream Argument

    • 895 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Descartes did not trust our senses for scientific foundations because they are not always accurate. He believed the knowledge we perceive of external objects through senses is susceptible to doubt. It is impossible to know if anything outside of us exists with just an understanding through senses. Therefore, scientific method could only come to us through the mind. In order to prove this theory and support his view he created three arguments in the first meditation: the “dream argument”, the “deceiving god argument”, and the evil demon argument.…

    • 895 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both Francis Bacon’s and Rene Descartes’ works share at least one common idea: there is a need to create new ways learning about the world. Bacon says that previous methods are outdates while Descartes suggests a new way of discovering the truth using doubt. Francis Bacon’s idols are idols of the tribe, den, market, and the theatre. Each of them represent a way of how an observation of a person can be corrupted by their nature, themselves, or other instances. He emphasizes that it is hard for an unprepared person to “guard themselves with all possible care against them” (Bacon 9). Nevertheless, Descartes does not take into account such factors and proposes an idea to question everything. He believes that the truth can be discover by doubt while…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Descartes means that humans are the Supreme Being reining the earth and we should know everything about it. We should only accept the facts that are precise and clear cut. Everything has a reason, and it is our job as humans to know what that reason is. Schumacher takes this discussion further by analyzing the ideas of the philosopher Immanual Kant. In talking about Kant, Schumacher said, "Neither mathematics nor physics can entertain the qualitative notion of ‘higher' or ‘lower.' So the vertical dimension disappeared from the philosophical maps, which henceforth concentrated on somewhat farfetched problems, such as ‘Do other people exist?' or ‘How can I know anything at all?' or ‘Do other people have experiences analogous to mine?'" (11).…

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays