Preview

Summary: Are Leaders Accountaable For Acts Of Ultra-Nationalism

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
288 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary: Are Leaders Accountaable For Acts Of Ultra-Nationalism
Written Response
Many extreme events are closely tied to the names of individuals – usually leaders of the nation at the time of the extreme act. Names such as Stalin, Hitler and Milosovic become entwined with the promotion of ultra-nationalism and the extreme acts, even if the leaders themselves did not physically commit the acts.
To what extent are leaders accountable for acts of ultra-nationalism?
Nations pursue national interest according to their agenda. A nation’s agenda needs to be promoted to be accomplished, however, depending on the plan, it can provoke conflict. When this conflict is unnecessary to the nation or it conflicts with other nations, that’s when the plan should no longer be perused and other options should be explored.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Cold War Dbq Analysis

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages

    For instance, the strategic position of countries has been behind foreign policy decisions taken by the United States. Let’s go back to the Cold War, when tensions between NATO and the USSR where incredibly strong and the world was threatened by a nuclear-bomb war. During this period of time, the United States was part of a group of western allies called the NATO, which was supposedly interested only in winning the war against communism. To win the war both the NATO and the USSR established military bases near both Russia and The United States. Even thought NATOS’s interest was only winning the war, the United States’ wasn’t. The United States had national defense interests for resource possession, especially ones with great significance or uniqueness for the Cold War.…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nationalism, not sectionalism, was the driving force during the era of good feelings. Nationalism became the leading ideology of the American republic. While sectionalism proceeded in bringing the nation into turmoil and constant bickering among the politicians, as in the case with dealings leading to the Missouri compromise, nationalism was able to unite the nation into a headstrong body, led by an ever-increasing, more powerful central government.…

    • 538 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    this as a bargaining factor when a country has not behaved the way we have agreed upon such as…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. The three components of the American System were establishing a new protective tariff, starting a new transportation system and restoring the national bank. Henry Clay thought that each of these components would strengthen and unify the nation because he thought the American system would unite the nation's economic resources because the south would grow food and raise animals that the north would eat and in return the south would by the manufactured goods the north made. A new transportation system would allow trade between the north and the south. Now America could finally become independent economically. And the tariff would help because during the War of 1812 British merchants brought a great deal of products to the United States and sold them at much lower prices than American made goods, so the tariff would raise the prices of the British goods so the American merchants could sell their products at a lower price.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Thesis: The duty to protect and intervene in other counties affairs, militarily if necessary, to protect freedom, liberty and to prevent genocide, ethnic cleansing, and other atrocities is a doctrine to which the United States of America should hold fast to under all circumstances. Throughout American history, the government has struggled to define the fundamental purpose of U.S foreign policy: whether or not the US should intervene internationally to promote freedom and preserve democracy or to maintain national sovereignty. The international community and the obligation that it holds to preserve peace is a responsibility not to be taken lightly. The commitment to uphold freedom and liberty as stated by our very own Pledge of Allegiance should…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the nation expanded into the west at an increasing pace, arguments over slavery in the west became more and more heated. The disagreement between the north and the south eventually led to the civil war. The expansion to the west also encouraged the disunity of sectionalism and the unity of nationalism.…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this chapter, Chenoweth suggests that states, nationalist movements and ethnic groups that engage in conflict with each other are faced with two options—violence and non-violence. She says that although major wars between states have become less common, today’s politics are filled with internal conflict, ethnic cleansing and violence against civilians. She asks the question as to why violent strategies are used instead of non-violent ones like protests and negotiation, even though they come at such a great cost.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We often see people “take it to the next level” in things they do, even on a daily basis. Imagine two people defending their school; let’s say a student from Sir John and one from St. Pats. Both are trying to convince the other that their school is the better, and each student gives reason for believing as much. Now imagine one of the students saying “My school is better because it just is. Your school is horrible and no one likes it because it isn’t St. Pats. And St. Pats is just better, you guys should just shut down your school because it’s dumb and isn’t just like St. Pats.” Would that student be justified? No, not so. They seem to have so much pride in St. Pats that they abandon all actual reason, and just become devout in character because they’re so convinced that St. Pats is the better school, almost blind faith in it, because they lose grasp of the reasons they actually have to love their school. This situation is comparable to ultranationalism. Both students start out with a strong sense of nationalism, which is devotion or patriotism to ones owns nation, or in this case; school. Although in this situation it isn’t a pressing conflict that will come to death or genocide, but sometimes it does. When people begin feeling ultranationalistic loyalties they may result in becoming violent, or begin feeling strong emotions of resentment towards other countries. Although it is important to have some sort of nationalistic loyalty, so that one can experience a true feeling of belonging within one’s own nation, however, it is important to be sure that these loyalties don’t become ultranationalistic because it often leads to racism, and in some cases violence towards members of other nations. A few examples of this are the Holocaust, the Armenian genocide of 1915, and the Rwandan genocide of 1994.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Myers states “Recall that conflict is a perceived incompatibility of actions or goals. Many conflicts contain but a small core of truly incompatible goals; the bigger problem is the misperceptions of the other’s motives and goals”. When we deal with conflict resolution and peacemaking, we have to keep in mind that each party has to keep an open mind and also be open to…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nationalism Review Sheet

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Camilo di Cavour: He wanted control of Northern Italy for Sardinia. He realized that Austria was stopping them so he combined French Sardinian army and he takes control of Italy…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The aim of one side may be to take control of the country or a region, to achieve independence for a region, or to change government policies.…

    • 2876 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Why War?

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Bibliography: Nye, Jr., Joseph S. Understanding International Conflicts: An Introduction to Theory and History. 4th ed. New York: Longman, 2003.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States administration also seeks for interests in other countries beside building “democracy” and bringing people's right and dignities. But this could also happen without the loss of big number of lives, only if it is managed in the right way. When the United States government decides to intervene in foreign countries, the decision-makers in the White House and the Pentagon should make the intervention limited to protect all the interests with a clear strategy and all the peaceful means to avoid losses. In the article “Restoring America’s Strength: My Vision for U.S. Foreign Policy”, urged that “The president has many tools to advance U.S. interests, and when used in proper balance, they will make it less likely that force will…

    • 187 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The concepts/topics to be discussed include; Deterrence and diplomacy, Global Challenges, and Economic Tool of power.…

    • 1921 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    President and Congress

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The first views foreign policy as "those external goals for which the nation is prepared to commit its resources" By focusing on what a country does rather than what it says, this pragmatic definition usefully separates a country's rhetoric from its true intent and its material capabilities. However, lack of action can also constitute a policy-the policy of an isolationist state is defined by its very unwillingness to commit resources. A second conceptualization of foreign policy is as "the range of actions taken by varying sections of the government of a state in its relations with other bodies similarly acting on the international stage...in order to advance the national interest". Notable here is the recognition that governments do not act as monolithic, static entities, and that non-state actors may at times be as influential as states. However, the assumption that governments always know what is in the "national interest" and always rationally work towards its realization is debatable. For the purposes of this…

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays