Sugary Drinks Persuasive Essay

Should the Government limit the size of sugary drinks? Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg proposes a law, in which to ban the size of sixteen ounces and decrease the amount of sugary drinks. Bloomberg's reasoning for his proposal is, by decreasing the obesity rate in New York City, help save people's lives, and hopes to have other cities follow his step. whether or not it help the obesity rate as much as Bloomberg speculates. Bloomberg's proposal
Limiting the size of sugary drinks does not maintain a low rate of obesity, instead has the same or higher rate. Brian Wansink said, "Soda ban will fail and jeopardize future public health. If the federal court passes the proposal, people will have an opportunity to refill their cup in certain places. Consumer will find a way to get what they want, for example, if the
Pigott wrote that "those earlier policies had a more direct link to the health of the public and representatives "minimal interference with the personal autonomy" of New Yorkers." The proposal is a good law, but it will affect family and the soft-drink industry. The family has to spend more cash on purchasing a small size drink instead of one large size drink. Soft-drink industry is worried that their drink product is a threat to the public health. The industry sales on the amount of drink product will be decreasing; if the federal court passes the proposal. A polls showed that the majority of New Yorker the law.(Grynbaum, New York Times). It also prompted panic among powerful beverage companies, who feared that their products could be a threat to public health (Grynbaum,s). People in the United States will have no freedom on the large drink size; if the federal court passes this proposal. The Soft-drink industry is worried that the consumer has no freedom of choices. When Bloomberg announced his plan on May 2012. Industry poured " millions of dollars into an ad campaign that framed the proposal as