Topics: Sociology, Bodybuilding, Self-esteem Pages: 7 (2598 words) Published: October 16, 2014
Self- concept in athletes is a considerable topic of research, which demonstrates much benefits of participation in sport for self- concept. Self-concept is defined as composite look of one’s self (Rosenberg 1979) an individual’s feelings and thoughts of their self or see their selves as an object. Self-concept is made up of experiences through environments and especially affected by significant others. Research on self-concept has emphasized that of global construct of general self-concept. Typically summing up of self-concept towards general aspects of everyday life and is indicated of a specific of one’s self concept. Self-concept, self-efficacy is thought to predict one’s actions, thoughts and emotions. However self-efficacy considers what an individual’s abilities and skills they may possess and less on what an individual possess. The comparison of self-concepts judgement is that it uses an evaluation of abilities and skills. Self-concept and self-efficacy in sport refers to an individual’s self-efficacy, self-concept that can be formed towards physical, general, emotional, and social domains. Self–concepts desirability (a content variable) versus self–concepts consistency (a structural variable), in predicting self–reported well–being. Development conforms to the field that differentiated and it becomes the person's "self". The "self" is a construct of these theories. It develops through interactions with others that involve awareness of functioning and being. Self-concept is the organized into characteristics that individuals perceive as peculiar to the person. It is based largely on the social and economic evaluations the person has experienced. Self-concept is thought of as there are three selves. Ideal self refers to how a person would want to be like. This represents one’s values, one’s sense of right or wrong. It’s what one would demand and expect of one ’s self, and normally based on moral principles that are acquired from family or other role models in one’s life. Public self refers to as an image of your beliefs that others have of you. With wanting others to believe that certain aspects of ones things about them that lead to love you or respect you, and help them meet or believe in their goals or aspirations, others may believe negative things that lead to rejection or punishment. Real self refers to subjective feelings, needs and thoughts that you see as the real you. A person’s real self is always changing, and a healthy individual strives to know their inner-self to look at their realities of the world. Communication process is put through interactions with the acceptance of experience, understanding of their real self. Conflict of real self, ideal self and public self that shows self-hatred, guilt and anxiety. Amateur and professional bodybuilding has shown anthropological and sociological focus of investigations of self-concepts (Aycock, 1992; Balasmo, 1994; Bolin; 1992; Fisher,1997; Guthrie, Ferguson,& Grimmet, 1994; Heywood,1998; Klien,1993; Johnston,1995,96; Lowe,1998; Mansfield & McGinn,1993; Mekolichick,2001; Miller & Penz,1991; Roussel & Griffet, 2000). Self-concept in amateur and professional bodybuilding has exclusively been an issue of self-esteem, and have examined potential benefits of participation in bodybuilding has aspects of self-concept. Components of a bodybuilder’s self-concept that has been investigated and show potential benefits in participation ( Mekolichick 2001). Examination and studies done on a bodybuilder’s identity, self-efficacy and authenticity to create a better understanding of their self-concept to fully understand a bodybuilders state of mind. Bigorexia is a major effect of self-esteem in bodybuilders,...

References: Aycock, A. (1992). The confession of the flesh: Disciplinary gaze in casual bodybuilding. Play and Culture 5, 338-357.
Balsamo, A. (1994). Feminist bodybuilding. In S. Birrell and C. L. Cole (Eds.), Women, sport, and culture (pp. 341-352) Champaign, ILL.: Human Kinetics.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
Blascovich, J., & Tomaka, J. (1991). Measures of self-esteem. In J. Robinson, P. Shaver, & L. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 161-194). New York: Academic Press.
Bolin, A. (1992). Flex appeal, food, and fat: Competitive bodybuilding, gender and diet. Play and Culture, 5, 378-400.
Donnelly, P. & Young, K. (1988). The construction and confirmation of identity in sport subcultures. Sociology of Sport Journal, 5, 223-240.
Erickson, R. J. (1995). The importance of authenticity for self and society. Symbolic Interactionism 18(2), 121-144.
Ervin, L. H., & Stryker, S. (2001). Theorizing the relationship between self-esteem and identity. In T.J. Owens, S. Stryker, & N. Goodman (Eds.), Extending self-esteem theory and research (pp. 29-55) Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press.
Ewald, K. & Jiobu, R. M. (1985).Explaining positive deviance: Becker 's model and the case of runners and bodybuilders. Sociology of Sport Journal, 2, 144-156.
Fisher, L. A. (1997). Building one’s self up: Bodybuilding and the construction of identity among professional female bodybuilders. In P.L. Moore (Ed.),Building bodies. (pp. 135-164). Rutgers University Press: New Brunswick, NJ.
Gecas, V. (1982). The self-concept. Annual Review of Sociology, 8, 1-33.
Gecas, V. (1986). The motivational significance of self-concept for socialization theory. In E. Lawler &(Ed.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 3), (pp. 131-156). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Gecas, V. (1989). The social psychology of self-efficacy. Annual Review of Sociology, 8, 1-33.
Gecas, V. (1991). The self-concept as a basis for a theory of motivation. In J. Howard & P. Callero (Eds.), The self-society dynamic: Cognition, emotion, and action, (pp. 171-187). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gecas, V. (2001). The self as a social force. In T.J. Owens, S. Stryker, & N. Goodman (Eds.), Extending self-esteem theory and research: Sociological and psychological currents. (pp. 85-100). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gecas, V., & Burke, P.J. (1995). Self and identity. In K.S. Cook, G.A. Fine, & J.S. House (Eds.), Sociological perspectives on social psychology (pp.41-67). Allyn and Bacon: NeedhamHeights, MA.
Gecas, V. & Schwalbe, M.L. (1983). Beyond the looking-glass self: Social structure and self-efficacy based self-esteem. Social Psychology Quarterly 46(2), 77-88.
Guthrie, S.R., C.Ferguson, & D. Grimmett. (1994). Elite women bodybuilders: Ironing out nutritional misconceptions. The Sport Psychologist, 8, 271-286.
Heywood, L. (1998). Masculinity vanishing: Bodybuilding and contemporary culture. In P.L. Moore (Ed.), Building bodies (pp. 165-183). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Hughes, R. & Coakley, J. (1991). Positive deviance among athletes: The implications of overconformity to the sport ethic. Sociology of Sport Journal, 8, 307-325.
Johnston, L. (1995). The politics of the pump: Hard core gyms and women body builders. New Zealand Geographer 51(1), 16-18.
Johnston, L. (1996). Flexing femininity: Female body-builders refiguring the body.Gender, Place and Culture 3(3), 327-340.
Klein, A. M. (1993). Little big men: Bodybuilding subculture and gender construction. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press.
Lowe, M. R. (1998). Women of steel. New York: New York University Press.
Mansfield, A., & McGinn, B. (1993). Pumping irony: The muscular and the feminine. In S. Scott and D. Morgan (Eds.), (pp. 49-68) Body Matters. Washington, D.C.: The Falmer Press.
McAuley, E. (1992). Self-referent thought in sport and physical activity. In. T.S. Horm (Ed.), Advances in sport psychology (pp.101-118). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
McCall, G. J., & Simmons, J.L. (1978). Identities and interactions. New York: Free Press.
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mekolichick, J. (2001).Self-esteem among amateur bodybuilders: A quantitative examination. Sociology of Sport Online,4(2). Available:
Mekolichick, J
Miller, L., & Penz. O. (1991). Talking bodies: Female bodybuilders colonize a male preserve. Quest, 43, 148-163.
Pearlin, L.I., Menaghan, E.G., Morton, A.L., & Mullan, J.T. (1981). The stress process. Health & Social Behavior 22, 337-356.
Pope, H. G., Jr., Phillips, K. A., & Olivardia, R. (2000b). The Adonis complex: The secret crisis of male body obsession. New York: Free Press.
Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the self. New York: Basic Books.
Roussel, P., & Griffet, J. (2000). The path chosen by female bodybuilders: A tentative interpretation. Sociology of Sport Journal, 17, 130-150.
Turner, R. H. (1976). The real self: From institution to impulse. American Journal of Sociology, 81(5), 989-1017.
Turner, R.H., & Billings, V. (1991). The social contexts of self-feeling. In J. Howard & P. Callero (Eds.), The self-society dynamic: Cognition, emotion, and action. Vol. 2. W. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Essay about Methodologies for Enhancing the Self-Esteem of Students
  • Essay about Analysis of College Students' Self Esteem and Their Desire to Feel Good About Themselves
  • Essay on How to Become a Better Student
  • Essay about Signs of Unproductive/Unmotivated Students:
  • Can Retention Be Good for a Student Essay
  • Critical Thinking Students Essay
  • effects of part time job to college students Essay
  • What Causes Students Dropping Out of College Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free