Preview

Strip Searches in Schools

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2010 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Strip Searches in Schools
Donovan Brown
Professor Stumpf
Criminal Justice 205
29 November 2012
The Fourth Amendment: Does it really protect “Everyone”? The Fourth Amendment is an essential part of the United States Constitution. It grants all United States citizens the right to not have illegal searches and seizures brought against them. With this being said, the most recent debate of the Fourth Amendment has occurred in the United States Public School Systems. Many kids and adults feel that students should have the same rights under the Constitution when attending school as they do when they are out. However, many school officials believe that to keep schools safe, it is essential to bend the rules a little bit. This paper will discuss the debate that is raging in schools, look at recent cases involving the Fourth Amendment and schools, and give my personal view on the Fourth Amendment in schools. The debate that is currently raging in public schools, is whether or not kids in public schools, can be strip searched or not. This has many parents up in arms, because they feel like this violates their children’s safety, as well as, their Fourth Amendment rights. The issue of the Fourth Amendment in schools was never really an issue, until the shooting at Columbine High School in April of 1999. This massacre really put an emphasis on security in schools. With this being said, many schools started to gear towards random locker searches and back pack searches. They never took it to the extreme of strip searches. However, with the recent school shooting at Virginia Tech and with the most recent massacre in Aurora, Colorado, many schools have stepped up their security even more. School officials are scared of having a massacre at their school. So by being over protective, they believe they can prevent one from happening. The debate has begun to surface and be more recognized because parents believe that strip searches are too far. When it comes to their children, most



Cited: Bracy, Nicole L. "Circumventing the Law: Students ' Rights in Schools With Police." N.p., May 2010. Web. 28 Nov. 2012. Donahoe, Diana R. "Strip Searches of Students: Addressing the Undressing of Children in Schools and Redressing the Fourth Amendment Violations." N.p., Spring 2012. Web. 28 Nov. 2012. <http://law.missouri.edu/lawreview/docs/75-4/Donahoe.pdf>. Feierman, Jessica R., and Riya S. Shah. "Protecting Personhood: Legal Strategies to Combat the Use of Strip Searches on Youth in Detention." N.p., Apr. 2010. Web. 28 Nov. 2012. Jarret, Laura. "EXCESSIVELY INTRUSIVE IN LIGHT OF AGE OR SEX?: AN ANALYSIS OF SAFFORD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 1 V. REDDING AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR STRIP SEARCHES IN SCHOOLS." N.p., June 2010. Web. 28 Nov. 2012. <http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/jlg/vol331/403-414.pdf>. Parker, Dennis. "Discipline in Schools After Safford Unified School District #1 v. Redding." N.p., Summer 2009/2010. Web. 28 Nov. 2012. <http://www.nyls.edu/user_files/1/3/4/17/49/1001/Parker%2054.4.pdf>.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In school, student's Fourth Amendment rights are limited. Teachers and school administrators are legally allowed to search students without a warrant. Student's basic rights are being violated and it shouldn't be legal. Their rights shouldn't be limited because it invades student's privacy. Also, these searches could be unreasonable and suspicion less. These students can be searched without a warrant. People in school shouldn't have their rights limited and violated just because of suspicious teachers. This limitation of students' rights is unconstitutional.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Safford Arizona school on October 8th, officials strip-searched a 13-year-old girl after they received information from another student that the girl possessed "prescription strength" 400 mg ibuprofen and 200mg naproxen. While attending math, assistant principle Kerry Wilson entered the classroom and instructed Savanna Redding's to his office. Upon entering, she immediately noticed her planner placed on his desk. However, what she didn't recognize was the knife, cigarette and lighter that was contained inside it. Admitting the planner was hers, she explained to the assistant principle that she had lent the planner prior to her classmate, Marissa and had NO knowledge of what was inside it. Also brought to her attention was a large white bottle of ibuprofen that was also found in the planner. Unsatisfied, the assistant principle asked to also search the rest of her belongings in order to disprove her claim. When no evidence was found, he proceeded to send her to the school's nurses office for what can be considered a strip-search. She was told to remove a clothing and in the processes her private areas (breast) were exposed. Complete embarrassed, she remained calm and did as she was told. No pills, or any other illegal item was found on her. Naturally, when Savanna 's mom discovered this she "dropped the bomb" and filed a lawsuit saying it violated her daughter's fourth amendment right (which was the right thing to do)and that she was never contacted during the search at anytime. Proceeding to the trial, the District court found no violation and a panel agreed, but on the appeal in a "en banc decision 6-5" the court reversed the other decision saying that it DID in fact violate her fourth amendment right. School district appealed to the Supreme Court and approved there appeal and granted certiorari. It was reasoned that the strip search was not justified nor was the scope of intrusion reasonably…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The statement, “The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places,” is one of the most controversial statements in Criminal Procedure. The amendment’s purpose is to secure individuals’ rights to privacy within their houses, papers, and defends them against unreasonable searches and seizures. However, to what extent does the law preserve a person’s privacy? The Law of Search and Seizure and the Search Warrant, give the government strict to stipulations as to how they are able to rightfully obtain information that is presumed to be private. Although Searches, Seizures and Warrants seem to have simple guidelines, they are each intricate categories.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Exclusionary Rule

    • 624 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Fourth amendment guards against unreasonable searches and seizures, along with requiring any warrant to be judicially sanctioned and supported by probable cause. The interpretation and execution of the Fourth amendment in the courtroom however, is decided by the Supreme Court in an attempt to find a fair balance between individual and community interests. The exclusionary rule for example, is a Supreme Court precedent that holds police departments responsible for seizing incriminating information according to constitutional specifications of due process, or the information will not be allowed as evidence in a criminal trial. The question that arises in turn, is whether the exclusionary rule has handcuffed the abilities to effectively protect the community by the police, or if it has actually resulted in a positive police reform which needs to be expanded upon.…

    • 624 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most Americans today don’t know what rights we are given. The Bill of Rights were put in place to give US citizens protection from corrupt police and government officials. A common Amendment that most Americans don’t realize we have is the Fourth amendment. The Fourth Amendment gives us protection against arbitrary searches and seizures without a proper warrant. It was first used to prevent the use of writs of assistance which is blanket search warrants with which the british custom officials had invaded homes to search for smuggled goods. As the fourth amendment has changed and evolved in its meaning over time, many Supreme Court cases have presented themselves to the states.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Wright, E. (2005), Third Party Consent Searches and the Fourth Amendment: Refusal, Consent, and Reasonableness, 62 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1841 (2005), http://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr/vol62/iss4/16…

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the case study “The Twenty Dollar Bill”, the students’ expectation of privacy outweighs the obligation of the school leaders to maintain good order and discipline in that there is no clear and reasonable threat to student safety or order. The students’ constitutional rights should not be jeopardized over twenty dollars. Furthermore, a bathroom search of any students must be reasonable related to the objectives of the search and must not be excessively intrusive. Since there was only twenty-dollars involved this case, a bathroom search would be highly unconstitutional considering the age of the students and amount of money involved. This is evidenced by a similar case Safford vs. Redding 2008.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tinker V Des Moines Case

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages

    "It can hardly be argued that either students or teachers shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate." This was the main argument from Justice Abe Fortas that came into play at the Tinker v. Des Moines School District Case of 1969. The case involved a small group of students who silently dissented against the government’s policy during the ongoing Vietnam War by wearing black armbands to school. In response by the school administration, each of those students was suspended from the public schools they attended in Des Moines, Iowa. This case is a prime example of the Constitutionally protected symbolic speech we have rights to, and especially to what extent it is allowed in public schools.…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The article "Suspect Searches: Assessing Police Behavior Under the U.S. Constitution," by Gould and Mastrofski explores the police usage of unconstitutional searches. Unconstitutional searches are those that are in violation of the fourth amendment. The fourth amendment rights, along with certain case laws put forth the guidelines for legal stops, frisks, and searches. Gould and Mastrofski perform a direct observation study which concludes the frequency of unconstitutional searches. This article puts police procedure under the spotlight and investigates the factors that seemingly increase the likelihood that an officer would engage in unlawful searches. In some cases, differentiating between constitutional and unconstitutional searches can be a difficult task, while in other situations police officers may obviously infringe on citizens ' rights. Any violation of rights poses many serious implications and consequences for policing, especially when it comes to effective community oriented policing.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Racial Profiling

    • 2031 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Weatherspoon, Floyd . "Racial Profiling of African-American Males: Stopped, Searched, and Stripped of Constitutional Protection." Race, Racism, and Law. N.p., n.d. Web. 16 Mar 2013. <http://racism.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1472:constitutional-protection&catid=130&Itemid=241&showall=1&limitstart=…

    • 2031 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fourth Amendment is concerned with privacy along with search and seizure restrictions that apply in public schools, but, the Courts give school officials and police more flexibility to conduct searches in school. In this case and law review you will learn about two different cases where Courts balance a student’s privacy rights against the school’s interest in safety and student discipline. This means that students often have less protection against what they might perceive as unreasonable searches and seizures at school, than in other places. The Fifth Amendment is concerned with fundamental fairness. This means that school officials cannot hold or punish a student without stating the reason and providing an opportunity to contest the charges.…

    • 1838 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Rights talk seeps into spheres of American society where a sense of personal responsibility and of civic obligation traditionally have been nourished. An intemperate rhetoric of personal liberty in this way corrodes the social foundations on which individual freedom and security ultimately rest." Because I agree with this quote, I firmly resolve the resolution that establishing a safe educational environment for grades K-12 justifies the infringement of civil liberties.…

    • 539 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The case of Terry v. Ohio is considered to be a landmark case because it is “understood to validate the practice of frisking (or patting down) suspects for weapons under diverse circumstances” (www.flexyourrights.org). These circumstances that allow for warrantless searches are applied only if and when an officer feels that peoples lives could be at risk, or if there is enough cause to believe that “a crime is in the process of being committed, a crime has already been committed, or that a crime was about to be committed” (Justice Douglas, dissenting, Terry v. Ohio). The case of Terry v. Ohio set a precedent for future cases because it changed the way searches and seizures were to be conducted and properly obtaining evidence through the use of warrants.…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly, the students see the searches of their lockers is an invasion of property given by the school itself "The biggest drawback to a school locker search is the lack of trust students may feel as a result of actions they see as an invasion of privacy. Because students may keep personal items in their lockers, such as photographs and personal letters, even a search with the best intentions can appear to be a major breach of trust by teachers and administrators, causing a rift between the student body and the faculty" (classroom-synonym) the evidence states that the searches would be negative in many ways. First being a violation of the 4th amendment, and second, searches decrease the trust between teacher and students in an environment where the teachers require the students to trust them. In addition, the students feel that it is a violation of their privacy. Students question why they are being targeted. Some schools say that the lockers are their property, however backpacks are the students’ private property, but schools state that whatever comes to school, the teachers are obliged to search if reasonable (classroom-synonym). In the case of New Jersey v T.L.O, although the bag was owned by…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    • a search of a student by a teacher or other school official will be "justifie…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays