Preview

Stricter Gun Laws

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1068 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Stricter Gun Laws
Every year at least one devastating mass shooting occur in the United States of America. Families across the United States suffer from their loved ones dying at the hand of a gun. For a long time the United States has long debated the issue on making gun laws more advanced. Americans are tired of dealing with mass shootings and wondering when the next shooting is going to happen. They want to see change with stricter gun laws preventing guns to be in the hands of the wrong people. Americans want proficient background checks that will actually work. Tougher gun laws and having more advanced backgrounds checks would be a reasonable and responsible solution for the United States to decrease the gun violence that corrupts American society. Advanced …show more content…
“ In the United States guns and homicide appear to go hand in hand” (Democrats). Now days it is very easy to get a gun in a short amount of time. In most crimes in today society guns are always almost linked to crimes. “Guns are involved in 1,000 crimes every 24 hours, guns take 29,000 lives every year.”( is there), firearms dominate the United States. At one point in time for a couple years people who were purchasing a firearm would have to pass a secure background check . These background checks would insure guns were not in the hands of the wrong people . The people of the United States wants the privilege of buying a gun to be taken away due to certain things that happen in the purchaser past. “2014 the supreme court passed a law banning any domestic violence offenders unable to buy a gun from legally owned gun shops.”( Gun control) Throughout the years violence skyrocketed with mass shootings and other types of shootings in the United States . In the mass shootings that occur in the United States the shooter who does the shootings usually buys the gun legally even when their background should have prevented them to buy a …show more content…
Global Issues in Context link.galegroup.com/apps/docs/A1622069571GIC?u=lees33148&xid=8e882dbd Accessed 15 Mar 2017.
“ People who die because a gun is available” New York Times, 4 Aug 1986 Global Issues in Context. link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/A176336120/GIC?u=lees33148&xid=ffc2ae46 Accessed 15 Mar. 2017.
“Democrats Find Their Voice on Guns.” New York Times, 29 July 2016. P. A22(L).
Global Issues in Context, link.galegroup.com/apps/A459404137/GIC?u=lees33148&xid=d63aebc8.
Accessed 10 Mar. 2017.
Mikva, Abner K,. and Lawrence Rosenthal. “ Tough Gun Laws are Constitutional”. New York Times, 24 Feb. 2016, p. A19(L). Global Issues in Context, link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/A444067212/GIC?u=lees33148&xid=27a17bb4. Accessed 10 Mar. 2017.
“ Democrats Find Their Voice On Guns.” New York Times, 29 July 2016, p. A22(L) Global Issues in Context, link.galegroup/com/apps/doc/A45940413/GIC?u=lees33148&xid=d63aebc8 Accessed 10 Mar. 2017
Clarke, Kevin, and James Martin. “ A history of violence: Gun control in America.” America, 18 July 2016, p. 31+. Opposing Viewpoints In Context, link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/A460324799/OVIC?u=lees33148&xid=7c0ac43f. Accessed 29 Mar.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Invincible Ignorance” by Thomas Sowell appeared in The Bismarck Tribune as apart of his syndicated column on December 24, 2012. Are gun control laws effective? Are guns really the problem? Or is it people that are the problem? Sowell answers each of these questions and states his opinion strong and clear. His tone, diction and background all play roles in his rhetorical strategy for his article. Gun control was a huge topic in the year 2012 and continues to be as we move into 2013.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Over 129 people died after The Islamic state of Iraq attack on Paris. AK-47s were used, but France is one of the toughest gun control countries in the world. We should not implement stricter gun laws because The 2nd Amendment in the U.S. Constitution guarantees the right to bear arms and criminals don't abide by the laws.…

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun control advocates focus on the serious negative effects on gun availability on safety, while gun ownership advocates emphasize the lawful use of guns and their place in our history and culture. While our history and culture is important we need to address the current national problem in order to live in a safe enough society. In an effort to stabilize and decrease firearm related injuries and deaths in the U.S. a strong federal law to control guns is needed. In the bigger picture, we people will see the United States, as a Nation, as a better safer place to live in and not to die…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gun deaths have been in general decline for 20 years. Between 1993 and 2000 the tally of gun deaths was down by 50%. As of 2012, there are 310 million handguns in America, 114 million handguns, 110 million rifles and 86 million shot guns." (Cooper 14). This means that guns are no where near as big of a problem as democrats make it out to be. Gun deaths are lower than ever and only continue to go down. “Clinton said “Her advisors think guns, including the assault weapons ban, could help Clinton break through to the female voters who are reluctant to trust her.”” (Elliott and Frizell). “Gun owners are rarely pigeonholed against all gun laws. They usually believe in some regulations." (Cooper 13). Gun owners are not stubborn morons like…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Until today, Americans have not reached consensus on gun-control laws. People who disagree with stricter laws have been saying that "more guns help protect citizens" because with guns they can defend themselves. However, people who support more restrictive regulations claim that loose gun-control leads to an insecure society ("Gun Control"). Because both sides have persuasive reasons for or against gun-control laws, we should implement moderate regulations to find a common ground instead of polarizing the…

    • 76 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In response to an article titled (Gun Debate: Where Is the Middle Ground?) written by Mallory Simon, writer and senior producer of online presentations for the Cable News Network (CNN) on January 31, 2013, the argument can be presented that “Guns don’t kill people, people do.” The article highlighted the common topic of gun control. In that phrase alone it is proposed that somehow guns have a mind of their own and can somehow control themselves. The author presents the proposal that somehow there may be a common ground in maintaining the use and sanction of guns in our country by creating a medium of strict public policy in the form of background checks and security. It is with strong supported evidence that an attempt will be made to argue that the power to control the illegal, malicious and careless use of guns is to limit the power of people to obtain them with a…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gun Controll

    • 1598 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The article written by Jill Lepore, “Battleground America,” is about the history of guns, how they are used, and how they are viewed throughout the past up to the present. She talks about major gun companies and their effect on the amendment, and how guns themselves do not cause negative harm but the people who own and use firearms for the wrong reasons cause harm. Lepore uses many strong points about gun control throughout her article to present her information for her audience to feel as though guns are put into the hands of the wrong people, and does so by creating enforced credibility in her sources, using negative connotative language, and an informative feeling to her article rather than an arguing stand point.…

    • 1598 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Do stricter gun laws ensure the safety of Americans? Throughout America an ongoing argument is on if stricter gun laws should be developed in order to attempt and deter gun violence. America does not need stricter gun laws because more laws do not mean there will be less violence, gun control laws deny people a sense of safety, more gun free zones are better for criminals, and the only way to stop bad people with guns is good people with guns.…

    • 1798 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gun Control Legislation

    • 2525 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Gun control legislation is a very controversial topic and one that has taken a lot of attention in both academic and public policy circles here in the United States for the past 20 or 30 years. One of the most powerful tools which people have discovered for dealing with the issue of controlling who should or shouldn’t have access to guns is through the creation of background checks. The purpose of background checks in a general sense is to allow for gun sellers and overseeing authorities to make sure that they are selling weapons to only those individuals who should be allowed to possess them. The main purpose of these background checks is to ensure that criminals, ex-convicts,…

    • 2525 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    York Times comments on the issue. The article “End the Gun Epidemic in America” that was…

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stricter Gun Laws

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The conflict of stronger/ tougher gun laws are a great debate. In the United States the argument varies per state and city. Cities such as chicago with a higher gun murder rate are prime examples of why we should have stronger gun laws. The gun laws in america have way too many loopholes. These loopholes leads to many mass shooting with guns being sold/bought by uneducated and mentally unstable.The Daily Beast reported over the last fourth of July, there was over 84 people shot and 14 of them succumb to their gun wounds. This wasn't the only bloody holiday in Chiraq due to gun violence, the past Easter(2015) was litter with gun violence with over 45 people shot and wounded. This is why we must implement stricter background checks. We need…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Speech On Gun Control

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Infact a shooting happened on April 2007 at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, “in which gunman Seung-Hui Cho killed thirty-two people. Just about any adult can go and buy a gun, without showing identification or passing a background check. As a result, Seung-Hui Cho, with a record of mental health problems, was able to open fire on classrooms at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in April 2007, killing and wounding many students and teachers.” Gunman Seung-Hui Cho bought his gun at a gunshow, with no background checks. If firearms were not available to the american public these 32 innocent victims wouldn't have died. The man who was lucky to have survived the shooting investigated the subject himself. He found out that at gun shows you can buy a gun in five minutes, and at a bit of a higher price you can skip the background checks. Every situation where there are armed civilians there are more chances of people…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States has the highest rate of civilian gun ownership in the world. That also comes with having the most mass shootings even rivaling war-torn countries. In 2015 only there has been more than three hundred plus mass shootings. With more shootings happening a lot more frequently, it is apparent that not nearly enough background checks into gun owners are being run. Three-quarters of people either own two or more. But what should be done about those who are attempted buyers that are turned away? Implemented in 1998 and Created under the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act, the National Instant Criminal Background Check System allows licensed gun sellers to check with the Federal Bureau of Intelligence, as required by the law, before a sale is made. While background checks have prevented tens of thousands of unlawful gun sales each year, opponents have said that the government doesn’t prosecute enough of the attempted buyers (‘‘The Case against Gun Background Checks’’, Good). More than 76,000 denials for gun purchases in 2010. 62 people were referred for prosecution and only thirteen of said prosecutions resulted in verdicts or guilty pleas. Some feel like there are already enough gun laws and that there…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the most debatable topics in the United States is the availability of guns. The debate on the topic of gun laws focuses on those who believe that owning guns is a Constitutional right while others believe that owning guns is a leading cause of much of the violence within the United States. However, there is a balance between the two debates that will lead to a better conclusion to the topic. Making guns illegal will only lead to criminals possessing illegal firearms while the law abiding citizens will be faced with the threat of criminals with firearms while they have no source of protection. At the same time, the current laws do not require every state to follow laws that would allow for the government to ensure that the firearms do not legally fall into the hands of criminals or those not responsible to own firearms.…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Columnist, Molly Ivins with the Fort Worth Star-Telegram writes in her (March 15, 1993) “Taking A Stab At Our Infatuation with Guns” article about the hypocrisy of gun ownership in our nation and emphasizes the unnecessary possession of guns by providing alternatives to guns. Ivins supports her claim by first using sarcasm by mocking the circumstances her points apply to; second she argues that guns in fact are to kill and nothing else and finally, society is NOT trained, disciplined militias thus cannot handle guns. Molly Ivins’ Op Ed is to persuade the Texas based readers and the entire nation that guns do not protect, guns kill. Ivins emphasizes a candid and demanding tone to stress the absurdity of the lack…

    • 130 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays