Preview

Strengths and Weaknesses of Articles of Confederation

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
596 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Strengths and Weaknesses of Articles of Confederation
Strengths and Weaknesses: Articles of Confederation

The Articles of Confederation was the first written constitution of the United States. With backlash from nine out of thirteen states, the Articles of Confederation were unable to seek approval by all and called for a ratification. Despite the multiple weaknesses, it organized a record of achievement. With some strengths, the Articles of Confederation led to the Constitution.

There were many weaknesses as per the ratification of the Articles of Confederation. One major weakness was that major decisions required approval by nine out of thirteen states rather than a majority. “There was not a single president to enforce laws or court system to interpret the laws” (Give Me Liberty pg 259). When it came time to vote for specific necessities, there was not enough states to make a clear decision. It is necessary to have majority rule to enforce laws so chaos does not occur. Another weakness was congress could not raise a national army for foreign disorderly actions. “In order to finance the War of Independence, Congress had to borrow heavy sums of money. By doing so, they had to sell interest bearing bonds as well as pay soldiers and suppliers in notes being redeemed in the the time to come” (Give Me Liberty pg 264). Being unable to pay the debts, the United States couldn't make it work, later ratifying the Articles of Confederation. In the face of the many weaknesses, there was potential strength in the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation allowed negotiation and the signing of treaties. One of the treaties was the Treaty of Paris, which negotiated Great Britain and North America to end the Revolutionary War. Without the negotiating of this treaty, the newly born United States wouldn't have international diplomacy against the immense and modern powers of other nations. With strength comes weakness. Under the Articles of Confederation, states were allowed to have their own currency.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    "From 1781 to 1789 the articles of Confederation provided the United States with an effective government". I disagree with this quote because the articles was to weak to keep the nation unified which made the article a failure. The Articles were set up intentionally to be weak because of the memory of a strong central government of the British. The articles were to weak to govern effectively so it did not have the ability to carry out designs with out controversy from other states. This caused major problems later down the road for America. The Articles did had some good points to it like the Land Ordinance of 1785 but it was ultimately a failure due to financial, foreign, and domestic problem the Articles had made.…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Regarding structure, the Articles of Confederation, or simply Articles, were relatively ‘bare-bones’ when compared to the complex constitutions and declarations of government other countries had. It laid out a simple and ultimately primitive government: the power of the government was to lie solely in Congress, a group of delegates from all states. It was to be Congress and only Congress to create laws and run most of the government. This concept did not work well in practice: Congress, the only branch of the government, was weak and unable to bring about policy change for the country. First, all amendments to the Articles required a unanimous vote of all thirteen states - something that was quite rare - and even the simplest of national laws required a two-thirds majority to be established. This became a major issue. As a new country, a lot of issues were going to come forth to Congress, and due to the bureaucratic rules that were in place, it was difficult for a treaty or policy to be approved. Furthermore, the Articles did…

    • 2437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation was the first American constitution completed by the Continental Congress in 1777. The Articles of Confederation created a “firm league of friendship” between all 13 states. Each state agreed to send delegates to the Confederation Congress where each state will cast one vote in Congress. Under the Articles Congress had no possession over trade or passing laws regarding taxes. However, Congress can declare war, appoint military officers, coin money, and foreign affairs. Unfortunately, there were some downsides to the Articles of Confederation that people from all 13 states did not agree with or argued about it such things as alliance, passing laws, courts, money, and trade. (Davidson, 189)…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although it provided an outline to how future government should be formed, The Articles of Confederation did not provide America with an effective government from 1781 to 1789. Nicknamed “The Articles of Confusion”, The Articles of Confederation lacked stability and the power to truly govern the states. Under the articles there was no executive branch and no way for the federal government to raise money.…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation was drafted in 1776 by a congress appointed committee even before America had declared their independence. It became effective on March 1, 1781 when the last of the thirteen states, which was Maryland, finally ratified the constitution. The Articles was the first written constitution of the Republic of the United States. Thomas Jefferson addressed the Articles as the best one “existing or ever did exist.” (Magleby)…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 1781 and 1789, the Articles of Confederation provided the United States with an ineffective government, Although there were flaws, strong steps were taken in the attempt to try and make the United States a better country. The Articles set up a government that gave individual states the power to make their own laws and enforce them. This was ineffective for the following reasons: 1) The Continental Congress controlled public affairs but there was nothing in the Articles that gave Congress the power to enforce laws or unify the states. 2) There was no solid system of money to ensure that taxes would be paid or protect commerce, both nationally and with foreign trade. 3) The country lacked unity and strength because there was no leadership.…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Any power the legislative authorities of the central government possessed under the Articles was undone by the absence of executive authority to enforce the meager amount of verdicts that against all odds were passed. Perhaps the weakness of the Articles is to be blamed on opposing individual state interests; however, it was still the Articles that were to blame for the division of the Union nevertheless. Though some historians believe that with minor alterations the Articles of Confederation could have survived for many more years,[15] its fundamental flaw – its lack of a 3 house Congress – was destined to be efficacious in the eventually switch to the Constitution. What the Constitution really achieved for the country was a foundation of authority. It states in black and white the powers of the Congress and the rights given to enforce those powers, whereas the Articles only gave Congress an arbitrary right to rule that could easily be ignored because of its noncommittal language and potential to be…

    • 2155 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Under the control of the Articles of Confederation, the central government was weak. Congress was a unicameral legislature that made laws. There were no executive or judiciary branches. Some of the weaknesses included that Congress can't pass laws unless nine states supported it, the Articles could not be amended unless all thirteen states approved it, Congress could not collect taxes, and they also could not raise an army. The seventh article states "When land forces are raised by any state, for the common defense, all officers of or under the rank of colonel, shall be appointed by the legislature of each state respectively by whom such forces shall be raised, or in such manner as such state shall direct, and all vacancies shall be filled…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of confederation allowed States to be independent while the federal government was overall a meeting place for all the state representatives to meet and debate new law. The federal government had laws in place but their were very hard to enforce. The federal government under the Articles of Confederation had no president. They instead had the Committee of the States which had one representative from each state. Even though that the Committee of the States was the most central form of the federal government, they had very little power to the Constitutional Congress.…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people tend to think that the reign of the Articles of Confederation were a complete waste of almost ten years and to some extent, they are right. The confederation style of government has many weaknesses. The Articles of Confederation gave sovereign power to each of states to rule themselves that isn't always a bad thing but take into effect the states history, they couldn't agree on anything. It was hard for them to become unified while they were fighting for their independence in the American Revolution. After the states won their independence they had to set up a government, and of course they didn't want it to be anything like the British so the central government was severely lacking in power, among other things. Under the Articles of Confederation The Congress had no power to levy taxes or tariffs; that makes for a ruthless shortage of money the only way it could gain funds was ask the states for money most of those requests were ignored or only partially met. Speaking of money, the congress did have the right to print its own currency, but so did the states. "One ground of discontent in the army" was the slowness of congress to pay their…

    • 900 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The American Revolution cost us a lot of money and since Congress couldn’t impose taxes on the states they didn’t have the means to pay back the loans they accumulated during the war. Another weakness in the Articles of Confederation was Congress did not have the power to regulate foreign and interstate commerce. Due to this states became divided from one another. This lead to competition for trade between the states. Despite its limited power, the Articles of Confederation have recorded some major achievements. Maybe the most important success was the formation of policies that helped develop the western land. This was possible thanks to the Treaty of Paris, Northwest Ordinance, and the Land Ordinance of 1785. For the Treaty of Paris, Britain had to surrender control of the region known as the Northwest Territory. No other government has ever been able to take this large territory that stretched from the Appalachian Mountains west to the Ohio and Mississippi River. In order to regulate these new western lands the Northwest Ordinance was formed. This declared that the region would be divided into three to five territories. Lastly the Land Ordinance of 1785 was created to setup a system of surveying and dividing land into new territories. After surveying, the land would be divided into 36 square mile townships.…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even though the Articles of Confederation did have some achievements like bringing peace and unity, they were more ineffective than effective for providing a stable government for the United States. The Articles of Confederation were ineffective for these reasons. First, The Articles of Confederation did not allow Congress to impose a tax, so this prevented the new nation of the United States of America to have a strong economic system. Second, The Articles of Confederation prevented the Chief Executive (President) from having any power and thus also having no military. Lastly, The Articles of Confederation didn’t allow the United States to have very good foreign relations with any foreign nation since we were viewed as weak.…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles brought the colonies together as a loose confederation with the states’ rights being more important than the power of the government. Even though the government under the Articles of Confederation was very weak, it was still more democratic because it gave more rights and power to the states. The Articles unified the states, which lacked a strong, central government. Although the Articles of Confederation had several successes, it created far more weaknesses and failures. First of all, under the Articles, there was no executive head of the government. Since there was no executive to be in charge of the nation, having a strong government was nearly impossible. In addition to, there was no judicial system with any federal courts, so matters and problems that existed had no substantial way of getting solved. The Articles of Confederation required ratification by all thirteen states, which nearly eliminated…

    • 841 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout these few years, the lack of a central government seemed to be an overwhelming factor when it comes to the effectiveness of this document. A large fault in the Articles is the inability of Congress to create taxes and regulate trade. There is simply no way that a central government can survive without taxes. Also, since the government had no authority over the colonies, they could not force anyone to contribute to the overwhelming war debt caused by the American Revolution. And without their ability to control the colonies, there is no central government. Also, the difficulty to make amendments to the Articles made it almost impossible for anything new to be put into action. With so many different ideals coming from the different parts of the nation, the Articles lacked in that it called for a nine-state majority to make amendments. It seems nearly impractical to try and acquire nine completely different states to agree on one topic, seeing they came from different parts of the country, and thus, making Congress close to nothing. And finally, if the U.S. were to be attacked by Britain again at this time, there would be no way for them to defend themselves, seeing that Congress could only ask states for troops, but could not raise an army. This would have been catastrophic if another country had decided to attack the U.S. for any reason. To sum that up, the inability to create taxes and trade regulations, the difficulty to make amendments, and the inability to rise up an army contributed to the ineffectiveness of the Articles of Confederation.…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution of the United States addresses the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation because it established the federal treasury, it is a product of careful consideration, and it compromises with the wants of anti-federalist…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays