Streetcar Named Desire And Running: Play Analysis

A Streetcar Named Desire and Running were two of the plays I attended this semester, saying both plays did a fantastic job is an understatement. Each play had interesting storylines that kept me intrigued throughout the duration of the entire showing. All the characters and respective directors did an awesome job as well. Although I had not been to many plays before coming to Washington College, had the plays not been mandatory I feel I still would have enjoyed attending them regardless. Both plays had clear objectives, obvious character identities, identifiable locations, consistent voice and movement, active listening and focus, and kept me interested as well as being believable. Attending the plays were the best decisions I could have made. In Running, clear character objectives were expressed. It was clear that Stephen wanted to prepare for his marathon that he would have to wake up early for although he had to entertain a guest named Emily. However, as the play went on, it became clear that Stephen needed someone to talk about his marriage as Emily began
A Streetcar named Desire kept me intrigued the whole time up until the last few minutes. I feel like I was more intrigued in this play because the pace of it was so fast and non-stop. The characters did a fantastic job of making the play believable. What stuck out to me the most and made me feel as if I was in the play was the surplus of characters. Something else that stuck out to me and made me believe the play was Stanley. He expressed his violence in a very believable manner without actually hurting Stella which made the play seem like real life. Blanch and Stella did a great job of making the play believable by conveying their emotions which can be a result of their acting skills and their voice. A Streetcar Named Desire made me feel like I was on the stage watching people interact in their everyday