Street Hawkers and Public Space in Mumbai
Author(s): Jonathan Shapiro Anjaria
Source: Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 41, No. 21 (May 27 - Jun. 2, 2006), pp. 2140-2146 Published by: Economic and Political Weekly
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4418270 .
Accessed: 27/03/2013 05:14
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.
Economic and Political Weekly is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Economic and Political Weekly.
This content downloaded from 184.108.40.206 on Wed, 27 Mar 2013 05:14:12 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Street hawking is generally considered as a "menace" or an "eyesore" that prevents the development of Mumbai as a world-class city. But this article explores the essential presence of hawkers in a city, which requires a critical understanding of the functioning of public space. The experiences of hawkers in Mumbai, as elsewhere in India, have taught them not to fear a regulatory state, but a predatory one, a state that constantly demands bribes and threatens demolition, against which a licence provides security. JONATHANSHAPIROANJARIA
he hawker question is central to the debates over public
space in Mumbai. Since the late 1990s, elite NGOs and
residents' associations have been actively promoting, with
some success, the idea that hawkers are to be blamed for many of the city's problems. To them, hawkers are "a symbol of a
metropolitan space gone out of control" [Rajagopal 2001:94]; a "menace" who inappropriatelyuse streets and footpaths, block traffic, depress real estate values and are, more generally, eyesores that prevent Mumbai from being a "world-class" city. This despite the fact that street hawking has had a long historical presence in Mumbai, provides essential services to most of the population and provides direct employment for over three lakh people, in addition to indirectly employing hundredsof thousands more [Bhowmik 2003]. Their essential and at the same time
contentious presence on the streets requires a critical engagement with the function of public space and the role of street hawkers in future plans for the city.
In order to understand the functioning of public space in
Mumbai, it is necessary to understandwhat hawkers actually do in that space, and how they conceptualise their own relationship to it. This is important because several parties involved in the debates over hawkers operate with a limited understanding of their work, their daily interactions with the state and the visions hawkers themselves have of a vibrant, democratic and wellfunctioning city. In an attempt to address this problem, this paper provides an account of the situation of hawkers in Mumbai,
drawing from field research conducted from June 2004 to September 2004 and from June 2005 to March 2006 with unlicensed street hawkers in Mumbai. It is also based on the interviews and informal conversations conducted with the activists working with Mumbai's elite NGOs (often referred to as "citizens' groups") and residents' associations, as well as the statements made by thematpublicmeetings. Demonstratingthe complexity of hawkers' daily lives and their interactions with the state will hopefully elicit new ways of thinking about the place of hawkers in Mumbai's
Hawkers and the Law
No new hawking licences have been issued in Mumbai since
1978, although, along with the larger population, the number...
References: constables, who. like most other low income city residents, Bhowmik, SharitK (2003): 'NationalPolicy for Street Vendors ',Economic
and Political Weekly,
dependon the cheap andconvenient productsandservices provided Bhowmik, Sharit K and NApril ore (2001):
If anything, the NGOs and residents ' associations derive their
Weekly,December 29, 4822-27.
power from deploying the internationally circulating language Chakrabarty.Dipesh (2002): 'Of Garbage, Modernity, and the Citizen 's
Gaze ', HabitationsofModernity: ssaysin the Wake f Subaltern tudies,
best demonstrated in the widely discredited, although still discussed, "Vision Mumbai" (2003) document, produced by the Chatterjee, Partha (2004): The Politics of the Governed: Reflections
on Popular Politics in Most of the World, Permanent Black,
consultancy firm. Groups such as Bombay First have used the CitiSpace (2004): Hawking and Non-HawkingZones in Greater Mumbai:
language of the global, or world-class, city to overcome whatever
technical or political objections there may be to their ambitions. Davis, Mike (2000): Magical Urbanisml: atillos Reinventthe US Big City,
The hawkers ' unions and other advocates of the hawker cause,
on the other hand, have not yet capturedthis rhetoricof the world- Duneier, Mitchell (1999): Sidewalk, Farrar,Strausand Giroux, New York.
Books, New York, 1992.
Rajagopal, rvind(2001): 'TheViolenceof CommodityAesthetics:Hawkers
those deemed "global"
and central America, because of their vigorous and multifarious Shekhar,Vaishnavi(2005): 'Shareof Migrantsin MumbaiHalves over 100
Years ', Times of India, September29.
use of public space for commerce and sociality, "form one of
the most important constituencies for the preservation of our Stoller, Paul (2002): Money Has No Smell: TheAfricanisationof New York
urban commons" (2000: 55). Why not, amidst the international Vision MUniversity Chicago Press,Mhicagointo a World-Class
umbai(2003): 'Transforming umbai
such as Davis ' as well? Public sociality and multifarious uses YUVA/TISS (1998): 'Census Survey of Hawkerson BMC Lands ', survey
of public spaces are things Mumbai, like other Indian cities, has
May 27, 2006
Please join StudyMode to read the full document