The research register for this journal is available at http://www.emeraldinsight.com/researchregisters
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at http://www.emeraldinsight.com/0262-1711.htm
Strategic management: an evaluation of the use of three learning methods Department of Strategic Management and Marketing, Nottingham Business School, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK Keywords Learning, Strategic management, Simulation, Action learning, Consultancy Abstract The article examines the use of three learning methods in the teaching of strategic management; the case method, simulation and action learning, in the form of a consultancy project. A survey of course members' perceptions of learning outcomes indicates that simulation is the most effective method. Conclusions are provided for the design of strategic management programmes and the development of action learning projects.
Received May 2001 Revised January 2002 Accepted January 2002
Introduction The concepts and techniques of strategic management are a key component of many MBA programmes, focusing upon issues of value creation, competitive behaviour and corporate development. Courses in strategic management often employ a variety of learning methods. Eldredge and Galloway (1983) find that strategic management courses typically make use of a number of methods based upon text, case, management games, field projects and guest speakers. Similarly Jennings' (1996) survey of strategic management courses in the UK found the majority of those courses to be using a combination of methods; lectures with discussion, case studies, guest speakers, tutorials based on current issues, business games, company-based research projects and consultancy projects. There can be a number of reasons for using multiple learning methods. Various methods may complement each other to promote the development of a wider range of skills (Teach and Govahi, 1993). Multiple learning methods can also be included in an education programme in order to introduce variety to the overall teaching programme. The use of multiple methods in a programme invites questions concerning their relative effectiveness in achieving learning outcomes and whether the methods complement each other in the skills which they develop. This article compares three learning methods used on a postgraduate masters course in strategic management: (1) the case method; (2) the development of a proposal and plan for a hypothetical new business (a simulation); and (3) a workplace-based project involving principles of action learning (a consultancy project).
Journal of Management Development, Vol. 21 No. 9, 2002, pp. 655-665. # MCB UP Limited, 0262-1711 DOI 10.1108/02621710210441658
Journal of Management Development 21,9 656
The intention of the strategic management course, and of the overall masters programme, was to promote the development of the students to become management practitioners. This aim was reflected in the learning methods that were employed by the course and their potential to address a range of cognitive, behavioural and attitudinal learning outcomes, many of which concern working with others, while undertaking strategy-based assignments. The case method The strategic management course made use of a number of case studies, including several short cases of less than a thousand words. Cases were generally used as part of a class to develop understanding of situations, concepts and techniques. The class session typically included a brief period of small group discussion before discussion by the whole class. The course also included several decision orientated case sessions in which students were asked to diagnose problems and propose options and recommendations. These exercises were group-based and included presentations. The use of the case method in management education was pioneered in 1910 by Harvard's newly formed...
References: Alexander, L.D., O 'Neill, H.M., Snyder, N.H and Townsend, J.B. (1986), ``How academy members teach the business policy/strategic management case course ' ', Journal of Management Case Studies, Vol. 2 No. 3, pp. 333-44. Argyris, C. (1980), ``Some limitations of the case method: experience in a management development programme ' ', Academy of Management Review, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 291-8. Christensen, C.R. and Hansen, A.J. (1987), Teaching and the Case Method, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA. Dooley, A.R. and Skinner, W. (1977), ``Casing case method methods ' ', Academy of Management Review, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 277-89. Eldredge, D.L. and Galloway, R.F. (1983), ``Study of the undergraduate business policy course at AACSB-accredited universities ' ', Strategic Management Journal, No. 4, pp. 85-90. Elgood, C. (1989), Handbook of Management Games, 4th ed., Gower, Aldershot. Faria, A.J. (1998), ``Business simulation games: current usage levels ± an update ' ', Simulation and Gaming: An International Journal, Vol. 29, pp. 295-309. Gilgeous, V. and D 'Cruz, M. (1996), ``A study of business and management games ' ', Management Development Review, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 32-9. Gunz, H.P. (1995), ``Realism and learning in management simulation ' ', Journal of Management Education, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 54-74. Hequet, M. (1995), ``Games that teach ' ', Training, Vol. 32 No. 7, pp. 53-8. Jennings, D.R. (1996), ``Strategic management and the case method ' ', Journal of Management Development, Vol. 15 No. 9, pp. 4-12. Lamond, D.A. (1995), ``Using consulting projects in management education: the joys and jitters of serving two masters ' ', Journal of Management Development, Vol. 14 No. 8, pp. 60-73. McGill, I. and Beaty, L. (1996), Action Learning: A Guide for Professional, Management and Educational Development, Kogan Page, London. Marsick, V.J. and O 'Neil, J. (1999), ``The many faces of action learning ' ', Management Learning, Vol. 30 No. 2, pp. 159-76. Miles, W.G., Biggs, W.D. and Schubert, J.N. (1986), ``Student perceptions of skill acquisition through cases and a general management simulation, a comparison ' ', Simulation and Gaming, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 7-24. Mintzberg, H. (1990), ``Strategy formation schools of thought ' ', in Fredrickson, J.W. (Ed.), Perspectives on Strategic Management, Harper Business, New York, NY. Osigweh, C.A.B. (1989), ``Casing the case approach in management development ' ', Journal of Management Development, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 41-57. Pedler, M. (Ed.) (1997), Action Learning in Practice, 3rd ed., Gower, Aldershot. Raelin, J.A. (1997), ``Action learning and action science: are they different? ' ', Organizational Dynamics, Summer, pp. 21-34. Read, C.W. and Kleiner, B.H. (1996), ``Which training methods are effective ' ', Management Development Review, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 24-9.
Revans, R. (1997), ``Action learning: its origins and nature ' ', in Pedler, M. (Ed.), Action Learning in Practice, 3rd ed., Gower, Aldershot. Romm, T. and Mahler, S. (1991), ``The case study challenge ± a new approach to an old method ' ', Management Education and Development, Vol. 22 No. 4, pp. 292-301. Smith, G. (1987), ``The use and effectiveness of the case study method in management education-a critical review ' ', Management Education and Development, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 51-61. Solomon, C.M. (1993), ``Simulation training builds teams through experience ' ', Personnel Journal, Vol. 72 No. 6, pp. 100-7. Teach, R.D. and Govahi, G. (1993), ``The role of classroom techniques in teaching management skills ' ', Simulation and Gaming, Vol. 24 No. 4, pp. 429-45. Towl, A.R. (1969), To Study Administration by Cases, Harvard University Graduate School of Business, Boston, MA. Weinstein, K. (1997), ``Participants ' voices ' ', in Pedler, M. (Ed.), Action Learning in Practice, 3rd ed., Gower, Aldershot. Wolfe, J. (1976), ``Correlates and measures of the external validity of computer-based business policy decision-making environments ' ', Simulation and Game, Vol. 7, pp. 411-38. Yin, R.K. (1989), Case Study Research, Design and Method, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA. Appendix. Questionnaire items (1) Acquire new knowledge about business and management. (2) Integrate learning from functional areas (accounting, finance, strategy, marketing, etc). (3) Increase ability to identify problems. (4) Add to understanding of how to seek and use information for problem solving. (5) Learn how to make decisions on the basis of incomplete information. (6) Increase ability to solve practical problems. (7) Increase competence for planning business operations. (8) Increase ability to implement your decisions. (9) Increase confidence in ability to work independently. (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (22) Become more aware of own feelings and beliefs. Become more aware of the feelings and beliefs of others. Add to ability to provide meaningful feedback to team members. Motivate people who work with you. Learn to help people resolve conflicts. Increase ability to communicate clearly and effectively with peers. Increase effectiveness as a participant in group problem solving. Experiment with new behaviour. Learn new behaviour. Gain a top management perspective on the operation of an organization. Learn something important about yourself as a manager. The exercise added a lot of realism to the strategic management course. Clarified your career interests.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document