Poznań University of Economics
Strategic management at the beginning
of the XXI century: the impact of crisis
Abstract: The nature of corporate strategy problems cannot easily be framed within a fixed paradigm. Strategic management is necessarily a multi-paradigmatic discipline, requiring varied theoretical perspectives and methodologies. The purpose of this paper is to present and assess the evolution of corporate strategic management in the first decade of the current century, particularly under the influence of the recent economic crisis. For the last two decades strategic management has been dominated by a resource-based view. Recently we can distinguish two important perspectives of research: behavioral and institutional. The first regards decision-making processes of company executives based on considerable progress made by psychologists in identifying and validating fundamental cognitive constructs which are promising for advancing theory and research on top management teams. The institutional perspective is based on increased realization of the importance of national and global institutions for the competitiveness of companies, sectors and countries. Keywords: strategic management, evolutionary framework, behavioral perspective, institutional perspective, entrepreneurship, hypercompetition.
JEL codes: D01, D02, D03.
Strategic management as a field of inquiry is one of the more important and widely cited subjects and forms a critical part of the business and management curriculum at all levels. In the early 1960s, there was little mention of strategy in company reports, whilst today it is difficult to find a company report without encountering the word strategy several times. A number of scholars have examined the evolution of strategy as a field of inquiry: Mintzberg, Ahlstrand and Lampel , Hoskisson et al. , Phelan, Ferreira and Salvador , Ramos-Rodriguez and Ruiz- Navarro , Nerur, Rasheed and Natarajan , Ghobadian and O’Regan , Furrer, Thomas and Goussevskaia .
POZNAŃ UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS REVIEW
Volume 12 Number 3 2012
Strategic management as a field of inquiry is firmly grounded in practice and exists because of the importance of its subject. The strategic direction of business organizations is at the heart of wealth creation in modern society. The field, like medicine or engineering, exists because it is worth codifying, teaching, and expanding what is known about the skilled performance of roles and tasks that are a necessary part of our civilization [Rumelt, Schendel & Teece 1991]. Strategy started life with a high degree of practitioner orientation and the theoretical perspective now holds sway. Strategy is academically more respected but arguably less relevant to needs of practicing managers [Ghobadian & O’Regan 2008].
1. Strategic management as an academic field of inquiry
Strategic management as an academic field has been reconceptualized and relabeled – from ‘business policy’ in 1979 by Schendel and Hofer . Strategic management is now a firmly established field in the study of business and organizations. During a relatively short period of time, this field witnessed a significant growth in the diversity of topics and variety of research methods employed. The field of strategic management is eclectic in nature. Its subject of interest overlaps with several other vigorous fields, including economics, sociology, psychology, marketing and finance. It is commonly asserted that the field of strategic management is fragmented and lacks a coherent identity. This skepticism, however, is paradoxically at odds with the great success that strategic management has enjoyed. According to Nag, Hambrick and Chen  strategic management’s success as an academic field emerges from an underlying consensus that enables it to attract multiple perspectives, while still maintaining its coherent...
References: Ansoff, H.I., 1965, Corporate Strategy, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Barton, D., 2011, Capitalism for the Long Term, Harvard Business Review, March, pp. 85–91.
Baumol, W.J., Strom, R.J., 2007, Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth, Strategic
Entrepreneurship Journal, vol
Bazerman, M.H., Loewenstein, G., Moore, D.A., 2002, Why Good Accountants Do Bad Audits,
Harvard Business Review, November, pp
Chandler Jr., A.D., 1962, Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial
Enterprise, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
Crossland, C., Hambrick, D.C., 2007, How National Systems Differ in Their Constraints on
Corporate Executives: A Study of CEO Effects in Three Countries, Strategic Management
D’Aveni, R.A., 1994, Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering,
D’Aveni, R.A., Dagnino, G.B., Smith, K.G., 2010, The Age of Temporary Advantage, Strategic
Management Journal, vol
Drayton, B., Budinich, V., 2010, A New Alliance for Global Change, Harvard Business Review,
Dyer, J.H., Gregersen, H.B., Christensen, C.M., 2009, The Innovator’s DNA, Harvard Business
Review, December, pp
Evans, G., 2010. Corporate Governance Culture – an Interview-Based Ethnography of Two
Boards of Directors Using Grounded Theory, Poznań University of Economics Review,
Furrer, O., Thomas, H., Goussevskaia, A., 2008, The Structure and Evolution of the Strategic
Management Field: A Content Analysis of 26 Years of Strategic Management Research,
Ghobadian, A., O’Regan, N., 2008, Where Do We Fit in the Swings and Roundabouts of
Strategy?, Journal of Strategy and Management, vol
Graham, J.R., Harvey, C.R., Rajgopal, S., 2004, The Economic Implications of Corporate
Financial Reporting, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series,
Habiby, A.S., Coyle Jr., D.M., 2010, The High-Intensity Entrepreneur, Harvard Business
Review, September, pp
Hitt, M.A., Ireland, R.D., Camp, S.M., Sexton, D.L., 2001, Guest Editors’ Introduction to the
Special Issue Strategic Entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial Strategies for Wealth Creation,
Hoskisson, R.E., Hitt, M.A., Wan, W.P., Yiu, D., 1999, Theory and Research in Strategic
Management: Swings of a Pendulum, Journal of Management, vol
Isenberg, D.J., 2010, How to Start Entrepreneurial Revolution, Harvard Business Review,
Kahneman, D., Lovallo, D., Sibony, O., 2011, Before You Make That Big Decision…, Harvard
Business Review, June, pp
Kahneman, D., Tversky, A., 1974, Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Science,
Kahneman, D., Tversky, A., 1979, Prospect Theory: an Analysis of Decision under Risk,
Kowalski, T., Shachmurove, Y., 2011. The Financial Crisis: What Lessons Can Be Learned?,
Poznań University of Economics Review, vol
Kowalski, T., Wihlborg, C., 2010. Problems of Governance and Institutional Environment in the
European Transition Economies, in: Kowalski, T., Letza, S., Wihlborg, C
Lafley, A.G., 2009, What Only the CEO Can Do, Harvard Business Review, May, pp. 54–62.
Lovallo, D., Sibony, O., 2010, The Case for Behavioral Strategy, McKinsey Quarterly, March.
Lui, A., 2011. Multiple Principal-Agent Problems in Securitisation, Poznań University of
Economics Review, vol
Martin, R., 2010, The Age of Customer Capitalism, Harvard Business Review, January-
Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., Lampel, J., 1998, Strategy Safari: a Guided Tour through the
Wilds of Strategic Management, Free Press, New York.
Mishina, Y., Dykes, B.J., Block, E.S., Pollock, T.G., 2010, Why ‘Good’ Firms Do Bad Things:
The Effects of High Aspirations, High Expectations, and Prominence on the Incidence of
Nag, R., Hambrick, D.C., Chen, M.J., 2007, What is Strategic Management, Really? Inductive
Derivation of a Consensus Definition of the Field, Strategic Management Journal, vol
Nerur, S.P., Rasheed, A.A., Natarajan, V., 2008, The Intellectual Structure of the Strategic
Management Field: An Author Co-citation Analysis, Strategic Management Journal, vol.
Nidumolu, R., Prahalad, C.K., Rangaswami, M.R., 2009, Why Sustainability is Now the Key
Driver of Innovation, Harvard Business Review, September, pp
Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H., 2011, The Wise Leader, Harvard Business Review, May, pp. 58–67.
North, D.C, 1990, Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge.
Penrose, E.T., 1959, The Theory of Growth of the Firm, Oxford University Press, Oxford,
Phelan, S.E., Ferreira, M., Salvador, R., 2002, The First Twenty Years of the Strategic
Management Journal, Strategic Management Journal, vol
Polowczyk, J., 2010, Hypercompetition in the Perspective of Schumpeter’s Theory, in:
Jankowska, B., Kowalski, T., Pietrzykowski, M
Porter, M.E., 1980, Competitive Strategy, The Free Press, New York.
Porter, M.E., 1985, Competitive Advantage. Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance,
The Free Press, New York.
Porter, M.E., Kramer, M.R., 2011, Creating Shared Value, Harvard Business Review, January-
Pozen, R.C., 2010, The Case for Professional Boards, Harvard Business Review, December
Ramos-Rodriguez, A.-R., Ruiz-Navarro, J., 2004, Changes in the Intellectual Structure of the
Strategic Management Research: A Bibliometric Study of the Strategic Management Journal,
Reich, R.B., 2007, Supercapitalism. The Transformation of Business, Democracy, and Everyday
Life, Alfred A.Knoff, New York.
Rumelt, R.P., Schendel, D., Teece, D.J., 1991, Strategic Management and Economics, Strategic
Management Journal, vol
Schendel, D., Hofer, C.W., 1979, Strategic Management: A New View of Business Policy and
Planning, Little Brown, Boston, MA.
Schumpeter, J.A., 1934, The Theory of Economic Development, Harvard University Press,
Please join StudyMode to read the full document