Strategic Human Resource Management: Usaf

Topics: United States Air Force, Military, Aircraft Pages: 12 (4863 words) Published: June 23, 2007
Human Resource Strategic Planning in the Air Force: Force Reduction

Human Resource Strategic Planning in the Air Force: Force Reduction
The United States Air Force is undergoing a radical transformation. Between 2007 and 2009, the Air Force will reduce its force by more than 40,000 people as well as undergo massive organizational restructuring. There is a high probability the Air Force will initiate a second round of personnel cuts. This Air Force transformation initiates fundamental changes in the technology and current organizational structure rendering current technology and warfare methods obsolete. It also comes on the heels of 16 years of non-stop military operations, the effect on aircraft, accelerated wear and tear. Since 1990, the Air Force has been involved in international policing actions, humanitarian missions and most notably, war against the nation of Iraq. The attack on the World Trade Centers in 2001 brought our nation into war against terrorism. Today's Air Force is operating with the oldest inventory of aircraft in its history (Unattributed). The cost of replacing and/or upgrading its fleet of aircraft runs into billions of dollars. The "force reduction" exercise significantly reduces personnel costs and the Air Force will divert these savings for fleet modernization. Force reduction implies a reduction in the current workforce however; the Air Force's mission (workload) remains unchanged. The Air Force initiated process-streamlining initiatives intended to increase efficiencies and minimize service level disruptions due to personnel losses.

The Air Force's vision is "Global Vigilance, Reach, and Power" and its mission statement "Deliver Sovereign options for the defense of the United States of America and its global interests—to fly and fight in air, space, and cyberspace." As the Air Force evolves, senior leadership adjusts tactical and strategic initiatives so the Air Force can continue to perform its mission while at the same time move towards its vision. Due to congressional budget restraints, leaders often find themselves making difficult decisions. The war with Iraq costs the United States an estimated 500 billion dollars annually (Critical Times for Air & Space Power). This cost coupled with rising operating costs such as fuel, aircraft repair and modification have forced Pentagon leadership to redefine how the Air Force must operate to continue to meet its mission requirements. For the Air Force, this means a smaller more lethal force. The Air Force needs to reshape itself to stay ahead of its perceived threats as defined by senior leadership. It is necessary to maintain air dominance now and in future wars (Burgess). To maintain air superiority, the Air Force has to recapitalize is fleet of aircraft as well as associated support systems. Congress has allocated some money for modernization but it's not enough.

The Department of the Air Force submitted its operating budget for the next six years and congress appropriated 690 million dollars, 20 billion short of what it needs to recapitalize its fleet (Christie). The average age of the aircraft in its fleet is 23 years old (Weckerlein). For example, the KC-135 air refueling tanker aircraft is a key component in the military's ability to perform global missions due to its strategic importance. It has been in service since the 1950's and is high on the list of aircraft to be replaced. Within the next 13 years, The Air Force plans a "Phase I" purchase of 100 new air refueling tanker aircraft to replace a portion of the current fleet. Congress allocated 100 million dollars for the Phase I purchase (Congressional House Report 108-622). This is a good start, but only begins to resolve the Air Force's modernization crisis. The Air Force is being forced to drastically alter initiatives put in place under previous strategic plans. Budget constraints have caused the Department of the Air Force to reduce the number of...

Cited: "Air Force still hiring." Air Force Recruiting Service (10 Aug. 2006). Online. Internet. Available (5 Nov. 2006).
Bennett, John. "Tanker Debate: Medium, Large, or Both?" (8 Mar. 2006). Online. Internet. Available,15240,90236,00.html (23 Oct. 2006).
Burgess, Lisa. "Top Enlisted Airman See Challenges Ahead." (5 July 2006). Online. Internet. Available,15240,104181,00.html (24 Oct. 2006).
Christie, Rebecca. "The Air Force Tries to Limit Budget Pain as Bills Pile Up." CNN Money (20 Oct. 2006). Online. Internet. Available (27 Oct. 2006).
"Critical Times for Air & Space Power." Air Force Association (n.d.). Online. Internet. Available (23 Oct. 2006).
Gettle, MSgt Mitch. "Air Force officials announce 2007 force-shaping initiatives." Air Force Link (26 July 2006). Online. Internet. Available (28 Oct. 2006).
Gettle, MSgt Mitch. "Air Force 's FY 2007 budget released." Air Force Print News (6 Feb. 2006). Online. Internet. Available (25 Oct. 2006).
Miner, Colonol James. "FY07 Force Shaping Message #2." Official Communication. 16 Oct. 2006.
Unattributed. "Aging problems to affect USAF planes for 20 more years." United States Air Force Aim Points (16 Sep. 2005). Online. Internet. Available (25 Oct. 2006).
Weckerlein, SSgt Julie. "Two New Programs Shape Enlisted Force." (17 Oct. 2006). Online. Internet. Available,15240,117037,00.html (20 Oct. 2006).
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Strategic Human Resource Management Essay
  • Human Resource Management Essay
  • Human Resources Management essay
  • Human Resource Management Essay
  • Human Resource Management Paper
  • Human Resource Management Assignment Essay
  • Essay on Strategic Management
  • Human Resource Management Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free