Mallard's inner conflict through her emotional struggle. Jennifer Hicks, a literary critic, states that the fact that Mrs. Mallard does not let anyone follow her could also mean that “she would have no one interfere with her life again” (“Story of an Hour” 270). After she endeavors to push away the feeling freedom, she finally allows the monstrous joy of freedom crawl into her. Her acceptance of this feeling is shown through the anaphoric statement, “There would be no one to live for her” and “There would be no powerful will bending hers in that blind persistence with which men and women believe they have a right to impose a private will upon a fellow creature” (Chopin 595). She can live her own life without being under her husband's oppression. Also, Mrs. Mallard experiences all of the emotion in her room where she is able to “admit or exclude whomever she wants” (May 3908). Mrs. Mallard is finally able to unchain herself from her feeling of
Mallard's inner conflict through her emotional struggle. Jennifer Hicks, a literary critic, states that the fact that Mrs. Mallard does not let anyone follow her could also mean that “she would have no one interfere with her life again” (“Story of an Hour” 270). After she endeavors to push away the feeling freedom, she finally allows the monstrous joy of freedom crawl into her. Her acceptance of this feeling is shown through the anaphoric statement, “There would be no one to live for her” and “There would be no powerful will bending hers in that blind persistence with which men and women believe they have a right to impose a private will upon a fellow creature” (Chopin 595). She can live her own life without being under her husband's oppression. Also, Mrs. Mallard experiences all of the emotion in her room where she is able to “admit or exclude whomever she wants” (May 3908). Mrs. Mallard is finally able to unchain herself from her feeling of