Stereotypes

As everyone know, a good-looking people attract interviewers, get hired faster, are more likely to make more sales and get more raises. According to Daniel Hamermesh, an economics professor at the University of Texas in Austin, points out the benefits in his book, "Beauty Pays: Why Attractive People Are More Successful." that “attractive people seem earning an average of 3% to 4% more than a person with below-average looks. That adds up to $230,000 more over in a lifetime of the typical good-looking person. Even an average-looking worker is likely to make $140,000 more over a lifetime than an less attractive worker.”
However, do they really performance better than average looking people? Sometimes you prejudice the people because of their appearance and personality. You might think the super-stars in Hollywood who have blonde hair or good-looking guys are not smart enough to study algebra and biochemical. Then, they have to use their attractive figure and acting talent to accomplice in their career. In contrast, the symbol of smart person might wear the thick glasses, carry a lot of books and have the pondering characteristic. They are considered unattractive people. Today, the stereotype of blondes or good-looking men being dimmer than average needs to be
They gave off the image of angel and innocence. At the same time, the descriptions in the novel of blondes are also attractive, seemingly delicate, and considered beauty while brown-haired, olive-skinned women were unattractive. Most literature from that era took such a stance. As a result, the unattractive stood up for themselves and their independence while the blondes always depend their men to be saved and taken care of, blonde women who we considered beauty slowly became known as weak and unintelligent, so to