Moreover, according to Bevans, the translation model recognizes the ambivalence and the need of redemption of culture. And finally, this model works well with people that have certain knowledge of a culture, being participant or non-participant. However, the flip side of these positive elements is that they can produce some pitfalls. First, the translation model has a low view of culture, hence this models has a unified view of all cultures. Second, this model high sense of Scripture and Tradition can give the false expectancy of such thing as a ‘cultureless gospel’. Finally, the gospel, rather that a revelation of God, may seem as pre-fixed set of …show more content…
Though rooted in a particular context, the uniqueness of this model is that it affected by social change. What is unique of this model is that is ‘on the move’. There is a continual dance between action and reflection; hence, this model is open to change. Due to this cyclical movement of action and reflection, the praxis model is aware of the present realities of the people and their future expectations. This model is the heart and soul of what came to be known as Liberation theology. A movement that is in continual dialogue, reflection and