Preview

Steinberg V Chicago Medical School Summary

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
322 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Steinberg V Chicago Medical School Summary
Steinberg v Chicago Medical School

Facts: In December 1973 Robert Steinberg, the plaintiff, applied for admissions to the Chicago Medical School. He paid an application fee of $15, but his application was rejected. After being rejected he filed against the school, claiming that they did not evaluate his application according to the academic entrance criteria printed in the school’s bulletin. Steinberg argues that the school based its decision primarily on nonacademic consideration such as family connections between the applicant and his family to donate large sums of money to the school. Steinberg assets that by evaluating his application to these unpublished criteria, the school breached the contract it had created when it accepted

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Katz (the appellant) was convicted under an eight-count indictment, charged with transmitting wagering information by telephone from Los Angeles to Miami and Boston. The evidence, telephone conversations overheard by the FBI agents with an attached electronic listening and recording device, to the phone booth Katz used. The Court of Appeals rejected the contention that the recordings had been obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment.…

    • 195 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Morrison v. Olsen, the issue of the Independent Counsel Provision in the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 was challenged and the court decided that it was not unconstitutional because it did not violate the separation of powers by taking power from the Executive and giving more to the Judicial or Legislative branches. Alexia Morrison had been appointed as the independent counsel to investigate Morrison to see if he had violated federal law; he sued her arguing that the Independent Counsel had taken away powers from the executive. The majority held that Morrison was an “inferior officer” due to the ability of the Attorney General to remove her for “good cause”, she can only perform certain limited duties, she is limited in jurisdiction, and…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the movie, A Civil Action, the plaintiff’s case commenced when a group of various parents and families suspected that the health related issues and deaths in their city of Woburn was the result of contaminated water. Although the attorney, Jan Schlichtmann, was reluctant to take the case at first because they didn’t have plausible cause “who is going to apologize to you when you don’t know who did it and pay me” [1], he perceived that 2 corporations sat on the border of the river. Mr. Schlichtmann and his firm thus took the case and filed a major lawsuit, which stated that that the two corporations, W.R Grace and Beatrice Foods, caused wrongful deaths due to the dumping of hazardous waste.”Lawsuits are a declaration of war. They begin the same way: with a complaint” [1]. The…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Suit was filed in May 2014 [Doc. #1] by Jackson HMA (the “Hospital”), seeking to recover damages from Physician…

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1980, patient (plaintiff) James Johnson filed suit against Misericordia Community Hospital alleging medical malpractice. The suit specifically alleged corporate negligence in the appointment of Dr. Lester V. Salinksy (independent member) to the medical staff at Misericordia Community Hospital. During the surgery, Dr. Salinsky severed the femoral artery, resulting in partial paralysis for Johnson (casebriefs.com). Ultimately, Johnson suffered a permanent paralytic condition to his right thigh muscles with resultant atrophy and weakness as well as a loss of function after undergoing hip surgery performed by Dr. Salinsky (Showalter,…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lee V. Weisman Case Study

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Summary of Key Facts A. Deborah Weisman graduated from Nathan Bishop Middle School, a public…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What is the difference between lawful trickery and unlawful coercion according to the 1990 Supreme Court decision in Illinois v. Perkins?…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This case involves the Plaintiff, Kelly Pryor, and the Defendant, National Collegiate Athletic Association, in a complex argument that involves racial discrimination under Title VI and the NCAA adoption of Proposition 16 as well as Americans with Disabilities Act and Rehabilitation claims. The court must carefully consider the claims Pryor has brought forth and determine if the discrimination of Proposition 16 was purposefully adopted by adding certain education requirement to ultimately hinder the amount of scholarships awarded to incoming black student athletes. Throughout this case analysis, I will weigh the different evidence presented from both parties and report the court’s reasoning for decisions made in Pryor v. NCAA.…

    • 1788 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Harvard Stevens Case

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In support of exclusions from gross income relating to discharge of indebtedness, Stevens v. Commissioner 2008 is a primary example as the court case was held in the United States Tax Court. Gerard Stevens was held responsible for determining a $21,323 deficiency in his Federal Income Tax for 2003 and the argument was whether Stevens failed to include in income his discharge of indebtedness or if he was liable for the accuracy-related penalty under section 6662(a). In 2002, Stevens purchased real property in Illinois which is a recourse state and the property was purchased for investment purposes by Stevens and his wife as joint tenants. As they were unable to make mortgage payments…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case: Goldberg, Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York v. Kelly et al. (1970)…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief - R. v. Hufsky

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Spot check was for the purposes of checking licenses, insurance, mechanical fitness of cars sobriety of the drivers.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The decisions made by Supreme Court chief justice John Marshall have had a major influence on today's Judiciary System. One of his major decisions was in the case Marbury v. Madison, in which he set the precedent of judicial review. Another major decision is in the case McCulloch v. Maryland, in this case Marshall ruled that Congress possesses certain implied powers. Other major decisions made by Marshall were in the cases Dartmouth College v. Woodward, Gibbons v. Ogden, in which Marshall defined national power over interstate commerce, and Cherokee Nation v. State of Georgia.…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Title IX Case Study

    • 1783 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In the lawsuit “Cohen v. Brown University,” the president and athletic director of Brown University were being charged due to discrimination against women in the grounds of intercollegiate athletics program. For many schools, men’s football program far exceeds the budget and receives many more sources than any other men’s program in most universities. The law came to existence in response to Brown University cutting off the women’s gymnastics and volleyball teams from university-funded varsity status to donor-funded varsity status, in May 1991. Simultaneously, men’s water polo and golf teams were also cut off and in consequence, their lost not only the university’s funds but all other privileges and benefits from Brown’s. “After hearing fourteen days of testimony, the district court granted plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction ordering that the women’s gymnastics and volleyball teams be reinstated to university-funded varsity status, and prohibiting Brown from eliminating or reducing the status or funding of any existing women’s intercollegiate varsity team until the case was resolved on the merits” (Thornton, 2011, p.512). Brown had initially 120 days to submit a plan to comply with Title IX, but failed in doing so and the district court modified the order to 60…

    • 1783 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Schenck V. United States

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The United States believed that a nation at war is justified in taking steps to in order to defend itself. The…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Slavery was at the root of the case of Dred Scott v. Sandford. Dred Scott sued his master to obtain freedom for himself and his family. His argument was that he had lived in a territory where slavery was illegal; therefore he should be considered a free man. Dred Scott was born a slave in Virginia around 1800. Scott and his family were slaves owned by Peter Blow and his family. He moved to St. Louis with them in 1830 and was sold to John Emerson, a military doctor. They went to Illinois and the Wisconsin territory where the Missouri Compromise of 1820 prohibited slavery. Dred Scott married and had two daughters. John Emerson married Irene Sanford. In 1842, they all returned to St. Louis, Missouri. John Emerson died the next year. In 1846, Scotts sued Irene Emerson for their freedom. The Scott’s stay in free territories gave them the ability to sue for their freedom. However, they did not do this while they were living there (Dred Scott’s Fight).…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics