Statistical Arbitrage in the U.S. Equities Market
Statistical Arbitrage in the U.S. Equities Market
Marco Avellaneda∗† and Jeong-Hyun Lee∗ First draft: July 11, 2008 This version: June 15, 2009
Abstract We study model-driven statistical arbitrage in U.S. equities. The trading signals are generated in two ways: using Principal Component Analysis and using sector ETFs. In both cases, we consider the residuals, or idiosyncratic components of stock returns, and model them as mean-reverting processes. This leads naturally to “contrarian” trading signals. The main contribution of the paper is the construction, back-testing and comparison of market-neutral PCA- and ETF- based strategies applied to the broad universe of U.S. stocks. Back-testing shows that, after accounting for transaction costs, PCA-based strategies have an average annual Sharpe ratio of 1.44 over the period 1997 to 2007, with much stronger performances prior to 2003. During 2003-2007, the average Sharpe ratio of PCA-based strategies was only 0.9. Strategies based on ETFs achieved a Sharpe ratio of 1.1 from 1997 to 2007, experiencing a similar degradation after 2002. We also introduce a method to account for daily trading volume information in the signals (which is akin to using “trading time” as opposed to calendar time), and observe significant improvement in performance in the case of ETF-based signals. ETF strategies which use volume information achieve a Sharpe ratio of 1.51 from 2003 to 2007. The paper also relates the performance of mean-reversion statistical arbitrage strategies with the stock market cycle. In particular, we study in detail the performance of the strategies during the liquidity crisis of the summer of 2007. We obtain results which are consistent with Khandani and Lo (2007) and validate their “unwinding” theory for the quant fund drawdown of August 2007.
∗ Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, 251 Mercer Street, New York, N.Y. 10012 USA † Finance Concepts, 49-51 Avenue Victor-Hugo, 75116 Paris, France.
1
1
Marco Avellaneda∗† and Jeong-Hyun Lee∗ First draft: July 11, 2008 This version: June 15, 2009
Abstract We study model-driven statistical arbitrage in U.S. equities. The trading signals are generated in two ways: using Principal Component Analysis and using sector ETFs. In both cases, we consider the residuals, or idiosyncratic components of stock returns, and model them as mean-reverting processes. This leads naturally to “contrarian” trading signals. The main contribution of the paper is the construction, back-testing and comparison of market-neutral PCA- and ETF- based strategies applied to the broad universe of U.S. stocks. Back-testing shows that, after accounting for transaction costs, PCA-based strategies have an average annual Sharpe ratio of 1.44 over the period 1997 to 2007, with much stronger performances prior to 2003. During 2003-2007, the average Sharpe ratio of PCA-based strategies was only 0.9. Strategies based on ETFs achieved a Sharpe ratio of 1.1 from 1997 to 2007, experiencing a similar degradation after 2002. We also introduce a method to account for daily trading volume information in the signals (which is akin to using “trading time” as opposed to calendar time), and observe significant improvement in performance in the case of ETF-based signals. ETF strategies which use volume information achieve a Sharpe ratio of 1.51 from 2003 to 2007. The paper also relates the performance of mean-reversion statistical arbitrage strategies with the stock market cycle. In particular, we study in detail the performance of the strategies during the liquidity crisis of the summer of 2007. We obtain results which are consistent with Khandani and Lo (2007) and validate their “unwinding” theory for the quant fund drawdown of August 2007.
∗ Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, 251 Mercer Street, New York, N.Y. 10012 USA † Finance Concepts, 49-51 Avenue Victor-Hugo, 75116 Paris, France.
1
1
References: Associated Press, Quant funds endure August turmoil. The Motley Fool, December 6, 2007. Barr, A., Quant quake shakes hedge-fund giants Goldman, Renaissance, AQR see losses, but also sense opportunity, Marketwatch, August 13, 2007. Cont, R., Da Fonseca, J., Dynamics of implied volatility surfaces. Quantitative Finance, 2002, Vol 2, No 1, 45-60. Davis, G., Mallat, S. and Avellaneda, M., Adaptive greedy approximations. Constructive Approximations, 1997, Vol. 13, No. 1, 57-98. Jolliffe, I. T., Principal Components Analysis, Springer Series in Statistics, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 2002. Khandani, A. E. and Lo, A. W., What happened to the quants in August 2007? SSRN, 2007. Laloux, L., Cizeau, P., Potters, M. and Bouchaud, J. P., Random matrix theory and financial correlations. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance, 2000, Vol. 3, No. 3, 391-397. Lehmann, B., Fads, martingales, and market efficiency. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1990, Vol. 105, No.1, 1-28. Litterman, R. and Scheinkman, J. A., Common factors affecting bond returns. Journal of Fixed Income, June 1991, 54-61. Lo, A. W. and MacKinlay, A. C., When are contrarian profits due to stock market overreaction? The Review of Financial Studies, 1990, Vol. 3, No. 2, 175-205. Plerou, V., Gopikrishnan, P., Rosenow, B., Amaral, L. N., Guhr, T. and Stanley, 46 H. E., Random matrix approach to cross correlations in financial data. Phys. Rev., 2002, E 65, 066126. Pole, A., Statistical arbitrage: Algorithmic trading insights and techniques, Wiley Finance, 2007. Poterba, J. M. and Summers, L. H., Mean reversion in stock prices: evidence and implications. Journal of Financial Economics, 1988, Vol. 22, 27-59. Potters, M., Bouchaud, J. P. and Laloux, L., Financial application of random matrix theory: old laces and new pieces. Acta Physica Polonica B, 2005, Vol. 36, No. 9, 2767. Rusli, E. M., Goldman Sachs Alpha to Fail?, Forbes.com, August 9, 2007. Scherer, K. P. and Avellaneda, M., All for one and one for all? A principal component analysis of Latin American brady bond debt from 1994 to 2000. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance, 2002, Vol. 5, No. 1, 79-106. 47