Preview

Statistic

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
800 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Statistic
9.18 a) Using forward stepwise regression to find the best subset of predictor variables to predict job proficiency.
The Alpha-to-Enter significance level was set at 0.05 and the Alpha-to-Leave significance level was set at 0.10. The first predictor entered into the stepwise model is X3. SAS tells us that the estimated intercept is -106.13 and the estimated slope for X3 is 1.968. The R2-value is 0.8047, mean square error is 76.87. The second predictor entered into the stepwise model is X1. The estimated intercept is -127.596, the estimated slope for X1 is 0.3485 and the slope for X3 is 1.8232. The R2-value is 0.933 and the mean square error is 27.575. The final predictor entered is X4. The estimated intercept is -124.20, the estimated slope for X4 is 0.5174, the slope for X1 adjusts to 0.2963 and the slope for X3 adjusts to 1.357. The R2-value is 0.9615 and the mean square error is 16.581. Predictor X2 is not eligible for entry into the stepwise model because its t-test P-value doesn’t meet the 0.05 significance level. We prefer the model containing the three predictors X3, X1 and X4, because its R2-value is 0.9615, which is higher than 0.9330 (the model containing just two predictors X3 and X1) and 0.8047(the model containing just one predictor X3). Checking the mean square error of the three models we find that the model we selected as best model has the smallest mean square error 16.581, which is good. To sum up, using forward stepwise regression, the best model to predict the job proficiency is Y= -124.20 + 0.2963X1 + 1.357X3 + 0.5174X4, a model containing predictor variables X1, X3 and X4.

b) Compare the best subset obtained from forward stepwise regression with that obtained from the adjusted R-square value criterion.

Above is the SAS output of the Adjusted R-Square Selection Method.
According to the adjusted R-square value criterion, the best model should be the model with

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    7. In Table 5, two r values are reported as r = –0.498 and r = –0.528. Describe each r value in words, indicating which would be more statistically significant, and provide a rationale for your answer.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Assign 2 Adm2304 W15

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages

    When you perform a test of hypothesis, you must always use the 4-step approach: i. S1:the “Null” and “Alternate” hypotheses, ii. S2: calculate value of the test statistic, iii. S3: the level of significance and the critical value of the statistic, iv. S4: your decision rule and the conclusion reached in not rejecting or rejecting the null hypothesis. When asked to calculate p–value, S5, relate the p-value to the level of significance in reaching your conclusion.…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Busn311 Unit 5

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages

    6.2 | 5.2 | | | | | | | | | 2.3 | 5.3 | ANOVA | | | | | | | | 4.5 | 4.7 | | df | SS | MS | F | Significance F | | | 5.4 | 5.4 | Regression | 1 | 0.20131 | 0.20131 | 1.279119 | 0.267657 | | | 6.2 | 6.2 | Residual | 28 | 4.40669 | 0.157382 | | | | | 6.2 | 5.2 | Total | 29 | 4.608 | | | | | | 5.4 | 5.5 | | | | | | | | | 6.2 | 5.2 | | Coefficients | Standard Error | t Stat | P-value | Lower 95% | Upper 95% | Lower 95.0% | 2.3 | 5.3 | Intercept | 5.068053 | 0.234247 | 21.63549 | 5.11E-19 | 4.58822 | 5.547887 | 4.58822 | 4.5 | 4.7 | X Variable 1 | 0.053004 | 0.046866 | 1.130981 | 0.267657 | -0.043 | 0.149004 | -0.043 | 5.4 | 5.4 | | 6.2 | 6.2 | | 6.2 | 5.2 | | 5.1 | 5.6 | | 2.3 | 5.3 | | 4.5 | 4.7 | | 5.4 | 5.5 | | 6.2 | 5.2 |…

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Math 533 Part 3

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages

    5. Test the utility of this regression model (use a two tail test with α =.05). Interpret your results, including the p-value.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    HLT 362 Exercise 31

    • 1068 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Answer: The greatest relative or standardized difference between the pretest and 3 month outcome is for the total risk score t ratio of t = 4.14*. Due to the presence of an asterisk next to the t ratio, it shows that the result is statistically significant. Therefore, the results shows that there been a decrease in risk score from pretest mean of 20.1 to 3 month mean of 16.8.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    PSY 315 WEEK 4 PROBLEMS

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Step 3: During this third step, the cutoff sample score on the comparison distribution at which the null hypothesis should be rejected is determined (Aron, Aron, and Coups, 2009). Here a researcher rejects the null hypothesis if the point of the cutoff sample score reaches or exceeds the sample score. If the null hypothesis is true the Z score is set as a score, which is actually unlikely.…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    AMB 201 Market Research

    • 3990 Words
    • 16 Pages

    a. Predictors: (Constant), Technological, centrality, Anthropocentric, Political, Competition, happiness, Economic, success | Table 1 Model Summary of personal values on environmental concern ANOVAb | Model | Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square | F | Sig. | 1 | Regression | 248.572 | 8 | 31.071 | 39.671 | .000a | | Residual | 793.402 | 1013 | .783 | | Total | 1041.973 | 1021 | a. Predictors: (Constant), Technological, centrality, Anthropocentric, Political, Competition, happiness, Economic, success | b. Dependent Variable: concern | Table 2 ANOVA of personal values of environmental concern…

    • 3990 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    tut3

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages

    h) Are the results of significance tests on individual coefficients different in the three models?…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    334 Assignment

    • 1371 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Included observations: 1019 after adjustments | | | | | | | | | | | | Variable | Coefficient | Std. Error | t-Statistic | Prob. | | | | | | | | | | | MANUF(-1) | -0.927533 | 0.031275 | -29.65726 | 0.0000 | C | 0.904355 | 0.177780 | 5.086927 | 0.0000 | | | | | | | | | | | R-squared | 0.463764 | Mean dependent var | -0.000177 | Adjusted R-squared | 0.463237 | S.D. dependent var | 7.631188 | S.E. of regression | 5.590923 | Akaike info criterion | 6.282127 | Sum squared resid | 31789.82 | Schwarz criterion | 6.291796 |…

    • 1371 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Statistics

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Quality Control: Assume that at least one of the tests from Part 4 was rejected (proportion not equal to targeted amount set by Masterfoods). Discuss how you would investigate the operations of the plant to determine why the proportions were off the targeted values. Speculate on three or more possible conditions in plant and bagging process that could have caused the observed results.…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anime LIst

    • 11441 Words
    • 52 Pages

    Which of the following, when used in an E-R model, indicates the need for an additional…

    • 11441 Words
    • 52 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    SSER - sum of squares of error of reduced model SSEF - sum of squares of error of full model…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    We started by finding the regression analysis for hydroelectric conventional versus wind power. The regression equation that we had was hydroelectric conventional= 5631695 + 4.74 wind. There was 23 cases used and 28 cases contain missing values and we got a p value of .183. We achieved a r-squared of 8.3% which is far too low, so we knew that we had to take out outliers in order to get a high R-squared. Washington was a large outlier because they have a large number of hydroelectric plants, so we took Washington out of our data. This gave us a regression equation of hydroelectric conventional = 2996890 + 4.41wind. There were 22 cases used now because Washington isn’t in the data anymore and we got a p value of .036. This gave us a R-squared of 20.2% and S=9544987, the R-squared increased greatly when we took out Washington which was a good sign, but the R-squared was still relatively low.…

    • 1121 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Du Pont

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages

    REGRESSION R 的倍數 R 平方 調整的 R 平方 標準誤 觀察值個數 0.975871171 0.952324542 0.940405677 0.035744042 16…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    1.b. Using the regression results from part 1 a, write the estimated total variable cost,…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays