Preview

State V. Prnkcus Case Study

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1685 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
State V. Prnkcus Case Study
STATE v. PRANKCUS

Facts: Judd approached the defendant in an attempt to calm him. The defendant then punched Judd in the face. A brief fight ensured between Judd and the defendant during which a shelf with ceramic mugs fell on the floor and shattered. Doucette, Anderson and Potkaj attempted to break up the fight. Anderson and Potkaj grabbed Judd by his arms to restrain him while Doucette came up behind the defendant and wrapped his arms around him to stop the fight. The defendant broke free from Doucette and attacked Judd again. Judd freed himself from Potkaj and Anderson in response to the defendant’s attack and punched the defendant again. The defendant then picked up a kitchen knife with an eight inch blade from the counter and strode six feet from the counter toward Judd, swinging and stabbing with the knife.
The defendant ultimately stabbed Judd and Potkaj twice a piece. Judd suffered a seven inch deep stab wound to the left side of his back. Potkaj received a seven and on-half inch deep wound to the right side of his chest and a superficial incision wound on the left side of his back around his shoulder blade. Everyone remaining at 69 House Street ran outside, but the defendant remained inside where he called the police. Both Potkaj and Judd collapsed on the
…show more content…
He came to discuss their divorce and brought along a supply of beer and liquor. The two parties apparently sat down at the table and began to drink and discuss the terms of their divorce. As the evening wore on, William became more angry and, finally, began to pound on the table. He started to verbal abuse the defendant and stood up and stepped towards her. According to defendant, she got up and retrieved the handgun from where she had placed it. She pointed the gun and Williams and said, “You are not going to beat on me again.” William apparently laughed, took one step forward, and defendant shot him in the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    FACTS OF THE CASE: The Appellant, Director of Finance at Toyota Marin Lou Suriyan Sisuphan, took almost $30,000 in order to persuade the termination of Sisuphan’s coworker Ian McClelland by suggesting that McClelland should be held responsible for the lost money. The Appellant did not have the intention to take this money permanently, and returned the money before any charges were filed, but not within the 24 hour amnesty period that the dealership offered. The dealership terminated Sisphan’s employment, and charged Sisuphan with a “felony offense of embezzlement by an employee of property valued in excess of $400 (§§ 487, subd. (a), 508, & 514) and alleging a prior assault conviction (§ 245, subd. (a)(2)) as a sentence enhancement.”JUDICIAL HISTORY: The trial court found Sisuphan…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    FACTS: Plaintiff sues DC Shooting range, where he is a regular, for its failure to prevent X, a high-ranking member of the gun-owner’s association affiliated with DC Shooting, from entering the range with a gun despite under the influence of alcohol, causing him to carelessly handle his weapon and accidentally shooting Plaintiff’s arm. Plaintiff built his prima facie case by alleging that on the day of the incident, defendant’s reception staff did not prevent X’s entry into the range. Plaintiff also presented witnesses who testified that prior to the shooting, X was stumbling out of the men’s restroom flushed and struggling to keep on his feet. Defendant countered by presenting…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    State V Metzger (Brief)

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Defendant was seen naked with his arms at his sides from the thighs on up at his apartment window by another resident. Resident notified police on the act. The officers testified that they observed Metzger standing within a foot the window eating a bowl of cereal and that they also, seen that his body was nude from the mid-thigh on up. The defendant’s case was dismissed.…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Presser V. Illinois was a landmark Supreme Court case in 1816. Herman Presser was part of a Citizen’s militia group, called the Lehr und Wehr Verein. They were a group of armed ethnic German Workers, they had formed in order to counter the armed private armies in Chicago. Herman Presser was indicted for arming a private army without having a license from the Governor. However, his charges were later sent to the U.S Supreme Court. Therefore after reviewing the case, and hearing Herman Presser’s testimony. The Supreme Court ruled in a 9/0 majority. The Supreme Court Stated “Unless restrained by their own constitutions, state legislatures may enact statutes to control and regulate all organizations, drilling, and parading of military bodies and…

    • 142 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    State v Stark

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Facts: Three medical tests performed on Stark; one initial and two consecutive in which resulted in and confirmed a positive diagnosis for the HIV virus.…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The knife was found in the Simpson’s Brentwood Estate by the construction worker. The retired Police Officer has kept it for more than twelve years; It was found there for a reason. There should be further investigation that has to be done. It was a knife that had been found in the condominium where the murder happened. It should be kept as an evidence room and not the Police Officer that kept it for twelve years. The OJ Simpson case will be an enduring event till the murderer gets caught. There are numerous ways that can resolve this case. The authorities should scrutinize the retired cop for analysis of the knife who kept it for in excess of twelve years. He might be tangled in this murder. Therefore, OJ Simpson was not found guilty of killing her ex-wife and her friend. He can pay someone to kill his wife and her friend. He should not be entitled for a parole next year of being convicted of robbery and kidnapping. He is serving sentence nine to thirty-three years in prison. This crime he gets himself in to should not granted parole. He should not have done in the first place. The experts can use his crime record in the…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The complainant pleaded guilty to possession of a pistol during the incident. A finding that the appellant and his codefendants were the aggressors is inconsistent with the fact they called the police and remained on the scene until their arrival.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Korematsu v. United States (1944) case was an unjustifiable case towards individuals with a particular race, but even though at the moment it seemed like the appropriate action to take for the protection of the people in our country, the action towards this race was completely inappropriate and unconstitutional. During the War of World War II, the president of the United States, Franklin Roosevelt put a float the Executive Order 9066 that targeted individuals from the Pacific Coast of Japanese ancestry both citizens and non-citizens. The order was to get any individual with in the area of the Pacific Coast to report to assembly centers where they were being detained until released by military authorities. Individuals with Japanese ancestry were being imprisoned without any evidence that they were a danger to the country and were deprived from their Constitutional rights. At first the first order was for any individual with Japanese ancestry to stay in their home with a curfew assigned to them, without…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A ballistics expert at the police crime lab examined a gun found in the apartment and…

    • 4262 Words
    • 41 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law Page About an Assault

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The case discusses how a 31 year old man who goes by the name of John Hoang ended up being charged with aggravated assault and assault with a weapon after a traffic dispute to which he plead not guilty. John Hoang had just exited Highway 401 around 7 A.M. on March 29, 2010, when a car then hit him. Enraged he tried getting the car to pull over but failed, but then managed to get a motorist, Gunanayagam Thurainayagam, to pull over. John had accused him of hitting his car. Gunanayagam denied the accusations, and moments later, Gunanyagam was seen with a piece of steel rebar ready to attack John. John in shock pulled out a box cutter and stabbed Gunanyagam in the shoulder and back, causing him to flee the scene but then turning himself in the next day. At trial John requested a specific amount of money for damages to his car, where Gunanyagam would refuse them all. After testifying and shaking hands with one another, John stabbed Gunanyagam again.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    George Davis Case

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In his argument, Davis alleges that “Count 1-Robbery with a Dangerous and Deadly weapon, Count two First Degree Assault, [and] Count 8 Use of a Handgun in the Commission of violence” should merge. For the reasons stated herein, Davis is precluded from asserting that first degree assault and robbery with a dangerous weapon should have merged. Moreover, the offenses of use of a handgun and robbery with a dangerous weapon should not have merged. We, therefore, hold that Davis’s rights under the Fifth Amendment’s double jeopardy clause of the U.S. Constitution were not…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Melrose

    • 836 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Your honor, opposing counsel, my name is Lamin Johnson, the prosecutor representing the state of Illinois. Larry Mabry stole Gary Roper’s watch, and then Gary Roper went back to the Sharks’ clubhouse and told the rest of the boys around 2:00 PM on October 11th, 2013 and he tried to get the rest of his gang members riled up, his exact words were “Let’s go get Mabry, he stole my wrist watch, we should go mess him up real good.” Roper knew that Dennis Moran was carrying a gun that day because when they were in the clubhouse Dennis Moran showed them the gun, Gary Roper even “ooed and aahed” about it. Dennis Moran also stated “Let’s go teach those Jets a lesson” and he kept on repeating those words over and over again, which shows that shooting the victim Larry Mabry was premeditated. Three hours later they went out to go look for Larry Mabry they saw the Jets at the corner of 27th and Miller and then the conflict erupted. Everybody started yelling and screaming at each other. Before too long the Jets were chasing the Sharks. Three gunshots were fired during the chase. While the Sharks were running, Dennis Moran pulled out the gun turned around and shot Larry Mabry twice in the chest and abdomen, let it show that Dennis Moran was not running away, if he had enough time to shoot that accurately. Let it show that Dennis Moran stated that he saw Larry Mabry with an alleged gun and claimed to have “run like crazy” to get out of there. However Dennis Moran did not see the alleged gun that Larry Mabry had because Dennis Moran did not have time to pull this alleged gun out, he only reached for his pocket and that’s when Dennis Moran shot Larry Mabry twice. Later that night Officer O’Toole arrested Dennis Moran and Larry Mabry. “In this problem, Gary Roper and Dennis Moran are accused if murder in the shooting death of Larry Mabry. Dennis Moran claims self-defense and Gary Roper will argue against accountability for…

    • 836 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jewell v state case brief

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Facts: Bridget Fisher bought a house in 1989 by herself. She married Barry Jewell, and he helped her fix the house. They lived together on and off and then married in 1990. Later, they got divorced and Jewell moved into his friend's apartment. When Jewell found out that Fisher was seeing another man, he told his friend that he wanted to beat her boyfriends head with a 2 by 4 and cut his dick off.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Explain the legal procedure of showing Dan’s legal liabilities. This Essay will outline the legal procedure surrounding Dan, who is on trial for the attempted murder of his girlfriend, from the moment a neighbor reported the crime to the police. It will detail the time from the process of this report up to the end of his trial.…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Facts: Kyle John Kelbel was convicted of first-degree murder, past pattern of child abuse, in violation of Minnesota state statute section 609.185(5) and second-degree murder, in violation of Minnesota statute 609.19, subdivision 2(1). He was sentenced to life in prison for the death of Kailyn Marie Montgomery. Kelbel appealed, and argued that the district court failed to instruct the jury that it must find that the state proved beyond a reasonable doubt each of the acts that constituted the past pattern of child abuse and he also argued that the evidence against him was insufficient to prove past pattern of child abuse against Kailyn. Kelbel testified that the head injury of Kailyn was inflicted by a cup thrown at her head by step brother Evan. Kelbel also testified that other injuries found on Kailyn were caused by Evan and that he is "rough" with her. Medical examiners ran an autopsy on Kailyn's body and determined that the injuries had been caused by blunt trauma and force caused by a knee or fist. Medical examiners testified that the injuries caused could not have been caused by a cup thrown at her head or by an accidental fall down the stairs. Kailyn's mother, Lindsey, also testified that Kailyn had previous injuries that she became concerned with. Upon retrieving a search warrant, police entered Lindsey's home to find further evidence. Police found a dent in the wall near Kailyn's bed. After Kelbel was eventually found guilty of the charges brought, Kelbel filed a motion for a judgement of aquittal and for a new trial on the grounds that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. The district court denied the motion.…

    • 603 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays