Preview

Stasis Theory Essay

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2093 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Stasis Theory Essay
Stasis Doctrine as Invention

The inheritance of a stable rhetorica from the Greeks gave the Roman rhetoricians of the first century BCE, the structure on which various new appendages were attached, one of which was the theory of stasis which was first formalized by Hermagoras of Temnos in the late second century BCE. Although the notion of stasis predates Hermagoras, Antoine Braet writes that he is due credit for developing “the doctrine of stasis as a closed procedure of inventio” (79) and that later rhetoricians have tired to reap glory for themselves by inventing all sorts of variants on Hermagoras’ system (80).
Stasis theory underwent several revisions—as evidenced in the works of Cicero later in the next century and the works of Quintilian in the first century CE—until Hermogenes of Tarsus, who appeared in the second century, offered the most intricate discussion of it in his thesis, On Stasis. Although most of Cicero’s work was centered on oration, he still is identified with the doctrine of stasis. Most rhetorical historians agree Aristotle provided the antecedent elements of stasis theory. Kennedy, for instance, notes that Aristotle’s observations at 1374a probably provided a seminal source for stasis theory—particularly stasis of definition. (104) Ray Nadeau theorizes that rhetorical stasis was developed from and
…show more content…
It can best be illustrated in the American justice system by such things as the common occurrences of evidence, obtained by illegal searches and seizures, being disallowed; or by mistrials being granted on the grounds that the prosecution violated a procedure that resulted in undue bias against a defendant. In ancient Greece and Rome, procedural stasis was often invoked in situations such as when the legitimacy of a governing body bringing a charge was in question (i.e. jurisdiction) or when a charge of procedural prejudice was

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Procedural History: At the conclusion of the trial, the defendant chose to move to dismiss on the grounds that the statute is unconstitutional, however, the courts found it unnecessary to pass due to constitutionality of the Ordinance because there is another reason it should be dismissed. The legal elements required to determine criminal accountability must be examined to determine if this case was handled correctly.…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With the emergence of the Roman Republic, the Senate, consisting of the patricians of the society, became “the governing body and the only body where debate was possible”. To debate properly in the Senate, “one had to know the persuasive art of rhetoric and oratory, or public speaking”. Cicero and Quintilian, both men of political influence in the Roman Republic, were well known as “quintessential figures of Roman rhetoric”, and they both used this art to promote the power of a leader and to gain…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ca 370 Exam 1

    • 3120 Words
    • 13 Pages

    rhetorical situation; close textual analysis; strategic ambiguity; declarative tone; characterization; repetition; neo-classical criticism; ethos; logos; pathos; syllogism; enthymeme…

    • 3120 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this essay, Scott attempts to address three questions: “Is there one way of knowing or many? What sort of knowing does rhetoric strive to achieve? Is rhetorical relativism vicious?” (1976, 259). He states that there are many ways of knowing, emphasizing the pluralistic nature of ‘ways of knowing.’ He believes that rhetoric should strive to achieve an actuality, or an agreed social construction (later it will become apparent that this facet of his argument is the one sparking the most debate). Finally, he attempts to dispel the positivist argument against him, that rhetorical relativism is vicious. This leads to some deeper discussion on the nature of subjective knowledge, of which his defining argument seems to…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    he “Rhetoric Situation” is a well-known article that was written in 1968 by a well-known author called Lloyd Bitzer. Bitzer starts the article in an unknown fashion by speculatingthe word Rhetorical so that readers could commence and improvise the term. How Bitzerportrays this term is by grasping many definitive words such as ethical, dangerous, andembarrassing and showing its readers how each word has a clear cut definition that each readercan understand upon viewing (Blitzer 30). If a reader views the phrase “rhetorical situation”confusion may occur upon contact but if we were to add a more delicate word next to rhetoricalsuch as speaker or audience, then the reader might catch a better sense of what the word is givingyou (Bitzer 30)Bitzer continues his quest of what the true meaning of Rhetorical Situation by implyingthe comparisons to a poet and a philosopher meaning that they would have substantial questionsto their…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Con Law 2 Outline

    • 9034 Words
    • 34 Pages

    Procedural Due Process: Fair and impartial judicial proceedings operating according to established rules and principles.…

    • 9034 Words
    • 34 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Pullman Distinguished Professor Emeritus in English and Writing award recipient, both describe rhetorical situation as a balance. Lunsford explains the rhetorical triangle as the audience, writer, and subject material, which are all “dynamically related in a particular context,” meaning that triangular harmony is essential and changes for every different piece of writing. In his book The Rhetorical Stance, Wayne Booth further illustrates this point by describing three bad, or out-of-balance stances: Pedant, Advertiser, and Entertainer. Relating back to our in-class discussion, the Pedant is too focused on the Logos aspect of writing, the Advertiser on Pathos, and the Entertainer on Ethos. These “corruptions” are not purely balanced and while they may be successful in certain situations, they will not achieve what Booth calls the ultimate goal of rhetoric: changing someone’s mind. In Booth’s view “[the author] can do so only if he knows more about the subject than we do, and if he engages us in the process of thinking – and feeling – it through.” Again, this concept applies directly to the use of Logos, Pathos, and Ethos in the rhetorical triangle. By saying that the author “knows more about the subject than we do” Booth verifies that they must have established credibility, or Ethos. Engaging the reader “in the process of thinking – and feeling” refers to Logos, and the application of facts and logic to an argument, and Pathos, the…

    • 1891 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Perelman, Chaim and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca, tr John Wilkinson and Purcell Weaver. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise On argumentation. Notre Dame, IN : University of Notre Dame Press, 1969.…

    • 2130 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The proceedings are designed to ensure a fair and consistent application of due process of the law. Predominantly in the Unites States. In the process of procedural law, the rights of the individual or organization may also refer not entirely to the rights to information, rights to fair justice, rights to participation which encompass both general Civil and Political rights. The process has a system of standardization for the means by which cases are brought, all parties are informed, evidence is presented to the parties and courts and the facts that are determined and intended to maximize the fairness the proceeding. Procedural laws deal with dates, times, numbers, and other pertinent aspects of case that must be met in order for the case to proceed according to the law. Procedural laws can be broken down into 2 main categories: 1) criminal, and 2) civil. Procedural laws differ depending on whether a case is tried in federal court or state court. Then, procedural laws differ from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and court to…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Ideologies – extrinsic, broad systems of ideas – reflected in language – that guide discourses as they respond to context.…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stoicism: “a systematic philosophy, dating from around 300 b.c., that held the principles of logical thought to reflect a cosmic reason instantiated in nature.” (dictionary.com). Marcus Aurelius (the author of “Meditations”) was a stoic as well as an emperor. The book he wrote was a collection of thoughts, things he advised himself to do, a piece reflecting his stoicism, and a personal diary of sorts. The kinds of things put into this book were sometimes crazy, sometimes contradictory, yet sometimes very true and insightful. Marcus wasn’t a professional philosopher, and this comes out in his work, but he had an interesting way of living his life. His writings are very bold and thought stimulating, inspiring even, but sometimes held to be completely wrong by some readers. As a reader of Marcus’s work, I stand somewhere in between; both agreeing and disagreeing with certain aspects of his ideas.…

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Staying Put Essay

    • 672 Words
    • 1 Page

    threatening our world and destroying it. All of these people leave a carbon footprint somewhere…

    • 672 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aristotle once defined rhetoric as “an ability, in each particular case, to see the means of persuasion” or in a simpler term, “persuasion.” The use of rhetoric dates back centuries all the way to ancient Greece. Rhetoric is simply used for everyday communication. It can be defined by three concepts: Logos, Ethos, and Pathos. Logos, Ethos and Pathos is explained in simpler terms as text, author, and audience. These concepts are the back bone of modern day rhetoric and are used to strengthen a rhetorical situation or argument. Rhetoric in turn fuels the concept of critical thinking or analyzing that are useful tools to help determine the validity and soundness of Rhetorical situations. In a glance, critical thinking is the act of identifying…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Following Socrates we meet Plato (427-347 BC), a disciple of the first. His general notions on the subjects of logic and rhetoric follow the idea that “the art of conviction is very closely connected with the art of persuasion.”7 Plato passed on this way of thinking to his student Aristotle (384-322 BC), considered to be the father of “syllogism” and “rhetoric” itself.8 Aristotle defines the art of rhetoric, not as the mere ability to persuade, but as “the ability to see the possible means of persuasion in particular cases.”9 In essence, the rhetoric that Aristotle managed was political and practical10, which is to some extent the rhetoric we deal with today. After Aristotle we encounter some important rhetoricians who developed their own viewpoints upon the topic. For example, George Campbell in the 18th century who argued that rhetoric should be done “to enlighten the understanding, please the imagination, move the passions, or influence the will.”11 And also Lloyd Bitzer, in contemporary times, who claims that there is such thing as a “rhetorical situation” and that it requires exigencies, audiences, and…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cited: Aristotle. Poetics. The Critical Tradition: Classic Texts and Contemporary Trends. Ed.David H. Richter. 2nd. Ed. Boston: Bedford, 1998. 42-64.…

    • 1551 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics