Preview

Stanley Milgram Experiment Summary

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
954 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Stanley Milgram Experiment Summary
Stanley Milgram carried out one of the most famous studies of obedience in psychology. He was a psychologist at Yale University, conducting an experiment that focused on the conflict between obedience and morality. It showed that people have a strong tendency to obey with authority figures. Milgram was interested in researching how far people would go in obeying an order even if it involved harming another individual. He was fascinated on how easily ordinary people could be influenced in committing evil.
In order to start his experiment, he selected participants by newspaper advertising for 40 male participants between the ages of 20 and 50 to take part in a study of learning at Yale University. They were enrolled for a lab experiment investing
…show more content…
To be honest, the situation/setting Milgram investigated would be more suitable to a military context because we are wiser when it comes to real-life situations. Milgram’s subjects were biased because they were all male and self-selected. This is only because they became participants only by nominating to respond to a newspaper advertisement. There were also a lot of ethical issues as well. There was deception in where participants believed they were harming a real person by giving them shocks. They were unaware to the fact that the learner was actually a confederate. Another was protection of participants where the participants were exposed to the extremely stressful situations that may have caused psychological harm. Many were visibly distressed that included trembling, sweating, nervous laughter, and biting lips. Milgram did debrief the participants after the experiment and even followed up after a period of time to make sure they came to no harm. He also had disclosed the true nature of this experiment, assuring the participants that their behavior was common. Not only did he gave debrief, but he gave the right to withdraw out of the experiment even though he had prods but those are justified as the study was about obedience. His findings have been replicated in a variety of cultures. Most led to the same conclusion as the original study and in some cases, saw higher obedience

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Stanley Milgram was an extremely famous psychologist who was best known for his groundbreaking experiment on the subject of obedience during the 1960s. Milgram began his career as a psychologist just around the time that the horrifying truth of the concentration camps came out. The fact that almost an entire nation obeyed one man, who commanded them to do inhumane and grotesque acts to other human beings intrigued Stanley Milgram. He became even more interested when he began watching the trial of Adolf Eichmann, who simply did not seem to be the appalling monster that many people expected and portrayed him to be. In fact, Milgram described Eichmann as being less of a “sadistic monster…[and] that he came closer to being an uninspired bureaucrat…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Stanley Milgram experiment takes normal everyday people and gives them orders to do horrible…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Milgram's Experiment brings up the point that people under the pressure of other, will more likely obey orders even if it goes against their moral beliefs. In "To Obey of Not to Obey", most of the soldiers obeyed their superiors because they were taught to do so. Similarly in Migram's Experient, the "teachers" obeyed when the experimenter pressured the subject to continue with the shocks. This can be related to Slaughterhouse Five because the German soldiers are under the command of their superiors who are requiring them to take American prisoners. This pressure was passed down from the German soldiers who demanded the American soldiers to clean up the charred remains of dead civilians after the bombing of Dresden.…

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Stanley Milgram 's essay Some Conditions of Obedience and Disobedience to Authority, the self-proclaimed "social psychologist" conducted a study while working as a psychologist at Yale University. The primary goal of Milgram 's experiment was to measure the desire of the participants to shock a learner in a controlled situation. The experiment was based on three primary roles: the authoritative figure, the learner, and the teachers. The authoritative figure instructed the teachers to shock the learner when they answered the question wrong. This form of punishment is typically believed to conflict with personal morals and the main reason for the experiment was to evaluate the teacher 's response to administering this type of punishment. For each experiment Milgram would select forty male subjects that had no prior knowledge of the study. The subjects sought for these experiments were male adults ages twenty through fifty. Not only was Milgram persistent in having a balanced age range of males for his experiment but he also made sure that they had a variety of different occupations.…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Milgram Experiment

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In nineteen sixty-three, Stanley Milgram conducted an experiment on obedience to authority figures. It was a series of social psychology experiments which measured the willingness of the study participants to obey an authority figure who instructed them to perform acts that conflicted with their personal conscience and confronted them with emotional distress. The experiment resulted in twenty-six out of forty of the participants administering the final massive shock of four-hundred and fifty volts, that is sixty-five percent. Milgram believes his experiment to be effective because (need to finish this sentence) On the other hand, Diana Baumrind argues that Milgram’s experiment is unethical to alter the participant’s trust for a figure of authority and believes they could be hesitant to do so in the future in any circumstance. (what else can i write here?)…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Milgram Experiment

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Cited: Cherry, K. (2012). The Milgram Obedience Experiment, The Perils of Obedience. About.com Guide, http://psychology.about.com/od/historyofpsychology/a/milgram.htm…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    John Darley’s criticism focuses on how the findings of the obedience experiments are applied to historical or real-world situations. He points out many ways in which the behavior of the obedience subjects in Milgram’s study differs drastically from the behavior of many others who commit atrocities: Nazi doctors or concentration camp executioners, for instance (Darley 133-134). However, since Darley’s criticism focuses on the behavioral differences between the obedience study and historical events, Milgram responds in a strong, convincing way. Referring to the process of comparing laboratory studies with real-world situations, Milgram writes, “The problem of generalizing from one to the other does not consist of point-for-point comparison between one and the other... but depends on whether one has reached a correct theoretical understanding of…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    When individuals abandon their own freedom for the benefit of the larger group, they are no longer individuals but products of conformity. Obedience to authority can become dangerous when morals and independent thought are stifled to the point that harm is inflicted upon another person. "The Perils of Obedience" by Stanley Milgram reports on his controversial experiment that test how far individuals would go in obeying orders, even if carrying out those orders caused serious harm to others. This experiment caused a lot of controversy and one woman in particular believed that this experiment was immoral. Diana Baumrind's "Review of Stanley Milgram's Experiments on Obedience" says that Milgram "entrapped" (329) his subjects and potentionally harmed his subjects mentally. Both authors are obviously concerned with ethics and validity but both see them in a very different light, which is apparent in their writings.…

    • 1658 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Stanley Milgram’s experiment was conducted to justify the acts of Nazi killings during the World War II. Milgram’s general findings after the experiments: Ordinary people are likely to follow orders given by an authority figures even to the extent of hurting or killing other people. He claims that people can act inhumanely with limited feelings and compassion under blind obedience to authority. On his experiment, most of the participants continued to inflict the punishment all the way to the highest level when assured that they are not held responsible. Some participants went on and follow the commanded actions even if they seemed in conflict and against their conscience.…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stanley Milgrams experiments are some of the most recognized behavior experiments in psychology today. Milgrams most known experiment was ‘shocking’ to people and has also been controversial ethically. As Ian Parker stated it would “make his name and destroy his reputation.” Parkers Obedience essay talks much of Milgrams life before the experiment and how the psychology community thought about his ethics.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Obedience and Authority Yale psychologist Stanley Milgram wrote an article, "The Perils of Obedience," which documented his unique experiment about obedience and authority. The purpose was to observe to what extent an ordinary citizen would compromise his or her conscience when ordered to inflict increasing pain to another human. The experiment consisted of three people: a teacher and learner chosen at random, and a scientist. Once all three were acquainted, the scientist explained that the goal of the experiment was to research the effects of discipline. Thereafter, the learner was strapped to a chair with an electrode attached to their wrist.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Milgram's Experiment

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Milgram’s Experiment was conducted by Social psychology by the name of Stanley Milgram, he created this experiment on how being in the presents of an authority figures would affect the way people behaved. This study was conducted in July 1969, just one year after the trial of Eichmann in Jerusalem. Milgram developed this experiment to answer the question "Could it be that Eichmann and his millions of accomplices in the Holocaust were just following orders? Could we call them all accomplices?" (The Milgram Experiment by Saul McLeod published 2007)…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Discuss the ethics of Milgram's obedience study. In the years 1961-1962, Stanley Milgram - Yale University psychologist, conducted the first of the obedience experiments, which were also called "shock" studies. The research was invented to check if the people would be ready to harm somebody just to meet the requirements of the experiment. This essay will be focused on the ethical side of the study.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Milgram's Obedience

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Diana Baumrind, a credited psychologist wrote, "Review of Stanley Milgram's Experiments on Obedience," while working at the Institute of Human Development at the University of California. In her review, Baumrind discusses phenomena which occurred in Milgram's Obedience Experiment. She briefly presents a case against Milgram by questioning the ethicality of Milgram's experiment. In addition, Baumrind provides excerpts of Milgram's own observations from which she deducts that Milgram seems unemotionally disturbed by his subjects’ strange reactions (Baumrind 91). She ends her review advising research psychologist to never expose subjects to indignities like those administered in Milgram’s experiment (Baumrind 94). In an article entitled, "Obedience," by Ian Parker, a British writer,…

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stanley Milgram had forty subjects which were all males. According to Milgram they were “recruited via mail and a newspaper ad. They thought they were going to participate in an experiment about ‘memory and learning’” (2008). There were many similarities between the men such as they were “aged between 20 and 50, whose jobs ranged from unskilled to professional,…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays