Preview

Stanford Prison Experiment Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1024 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Stanford Prison Experiment Analysis
The video contained the results and analysations of a social experiment called the Stanford Prison Experiment. This experiment watched over 24 young, healthy, college men. They then flipped a coin to see which 12 would act as guards and which 12 would act as prisoners inside of a prison simulation. They acted out this simulation for 6 days before it was cut short due to the amount of cruelty that the men were experiencing. Originally it was to last 2 weeks but after a few had to drop out due to mental breaks they ended it. The men within this experiment acted rough and unlike anyone thought. The mock guards had given the prisoners harsh treatments and the prisoners revolted which caused both parties to be unhappy and put into situations …show more content…
The video shows a great example on how when people are given certain titles, even when they mean very little, they can still let the power of it go to their head. Many of the choices they had made were unethical but they had still gone through with them. Was it the fact that they had authority? Or maybe it was just the ideal of being a guard in prison that sent them into these actions. Ethics are the principals and morals that determine a person's actions and thoughts. Though all the men were equals outside of the experiment, once they were put into a situation where half had authority over the other, the level playing field was forgotten. This is an example of the Social-Conflict Paradigm. The Social-Conflict Paradigm is a large scale view on how when a society views and area of inequality and generates conflict and social change. Some of the key factors are displayed within this experiment. There is a dominant group versus a disadvantaged group, the guards versus the prisoners. While there is no factor such as race, sex, or gender involved there is a community made between this group that is structured unfairly. They are set up to have 12 managing the others and keeping them in …show more content…
There are the stubborn, the rule followers, the unstable one who cannot handle the prison, and so on. Even when they brought in a priest from the local prison he had said that he had observed them as acting similarly to those who had actually be incarcerated, and it was only a simulation. The realness may have been what was causing the boys to act so unfairly towards each other. They were fully immersing themselves into this and mentally became their role. The prisoners had even admitted to not feeling like themselves and more towards their prison number. This was possibly too much for them to handle. Prison is a rough place, even in just a simulation. They had been locking themselves in a mental prison. They had been told before they could leave whenever they felt if they could not handle the conditions they were put in but instead they had convinced themselves they were real prisoners in a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment was an experiment that Philip Zimbardo evented. He wanted to study the human response of captivity, of the prison life. Zimbardo randomly assigned roles to the prisoners and the guards. Each role was uniquely identified. For example, he gave the guards sticks and sunglasses and the prisoners were arrested by the police department and were forced into the basement of the jail which was converted into the psychology department that was converted into a makeshift jail. Zimbardo wanted the experiment to be as realistic as he possibly could have made it, therefore, he assigned each role to help do so. Testing each individual and then assigning them to roles would of gave inconclusive readings and therefore, it was…

    • 164 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When people are given little to no direction or training, and are faced with dealing with people they may perceive as a threat to their own safety and the well-being of others, they have a propensity to overstep what most would consider reasonable behavior. The “guards” in the experiment were put into a position of authority and took the steps they deemed necessary to maintain order. In spite of the fact that they knew it was an experiment, they were immersed in the situation and played the role given them. The “prisoners” played their part and were so wholly immersed in the role and the environment that their entire perspective of reality was altered. They began to believe they were helpless and unable to help themselves out of the situation they found themselves. They had become powerless to change the situation, in spite of the fact that it was just an…

    • 1846 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    A controversial experiment by Zimbardo (1971) (Spoors et al.) shows how a groups of males were separated into two groups of guards and prisoners in a make shift prison. After six days of a two week experiment it was stopped. The guards became abusive while the prisoners showed signs of emotional disturbance.…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1971, psychologist Phillip Zimbardo set out to create an experiment that looked at the impact of becoming a prisoner or a prison guard. The experiment was to test human behavior when one's role had been altered into authoritative one. Still powerful after all these years the experiment was the most powerful and popular experiment of all time (O'Toole, K). Researches set up a mock prison in the basement of Stanford University building. There were the 24 students out of 70 volunteers chosen to play the roles of the prisoners or prison guards.…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Can good, moral, and virtuous people be pushed to do bad things? This article seeks to compare an experiment done in 1971 to a real life military situation during wartime. The article also tries to link the experiment to another horrible act done by someone suffering from various mental illnesses with extremely mixed results. Is there a correlation between these three events as far as the mental states of the participants?…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The articles “The Stanford Prison Experiment” written by Philip G. Zimbardo and “The My Lai Massacre: A Military Crime of Obedience” composed by Herbert C. Kelman and V. Lee Hamilton both focus on the effects of power. In which the subjects have been ordered to follow something by superiors. In the experiment the original group of subjects are divided into the role of guards, and inmates. The massacre, however, was not an experiment but was the result of an order issued by a higher ranking official. In comparison the movie A Few Good Men was used. This movie contained the same main underlying concepts as the articles which makes it a good comparison. Involved were two marine who were charged with murder of a fellow marine and the conspiracy…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    My first impression from watching the film was the relationship between the study’s prisoners and guards seemed friendly at first. Though they’re encouraged by Zimbardo and his associates to take the experiment seriously and to invest themselves fully in their roles, the subjects initially still understand that they’re not really in a prison but then, the experiment takes a turn when a guard named Christopher Archer begins to embrace a meaner personality one, in which I suspect from watching the experiment, is not his normal demeanor but, rather, a more boosted version of himself of which he perceives to be his role. Archer introduces an element of meanness to the proceedings, altering the prisoners’ mindset the prisoners start to feel dehumanization…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For example, within hours of beginning of this experiment, guards started harassing prisoners and behaved in a brutal manner, seems like they were enjoying it. Another example, the prisoners were taunted with insults and tortured by giving different tasks such as cleaning toilets with bare hands, etc. The participants felts involved and committed. In addition, this experiment was attempted to isolate the source of conflicts between prisoners and guards in terms of role, power and individual behavior. For example, guards were firmly in control and prisoners were completely dependent on them.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A team at Stanford University, led by Phillip Zimbardo, conducted the Stanford Prison Experiment to investigate causes of conflict between military guards and prisoners. Zimbardo and his team were seeking to observe the inherent personality traits of prisoners and guards and see if this was the chief cause of abusive behavior in these settings (Haney, Banks, and Zimbardo, 1973). This study is one that is well know and well-recognized. Zimbardo and his study are often discussed in many psychology courses today, and have even caused reform in prison systems as well as IRB/APA ethical committees.…

    • 1783 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Popular culture is a fantasy promoting social phenomenon that defines the reality of unknown regions and the nature of their inhabitants for ‘outsiders’.” (Riley) Influences of popular culture on society are overwhelmingly strong. When Hollywood focuses on the correction system, particularly maximum security prisons, they create negative prison stereotypes. Much of these negative stereotypes lie in the staff of the prisons. The ideas have been expressed in a variety of ways, yet among the recurring themes and generalizations surround the corrupt prison guard. One theme is the omnipresent, tyrannical warden, who haphazardly enforces punishments on the seemingly undeserving inmates. Another them is the depiction of the sleazy prison guards who turn their backs when foul play is occurring and often take bribes from inmates. Lastly, another frequent depiction is that of a sadistic, abusive, power-driven sociopath, who often engages in sexual abuse and battery. It is not hard to imagine the stigma placed on the mass of correctional workers due to the mishaps of a small percentage.…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to continue the experiment, deception and manipulation had to be used on the prisoners and their families. The basement was cleaned, rearranged and made presentable for outsiders. The prisoners were groomed, feed a hot meal and warned about not complaining when the families arrived or the visit would be cut short. The families were greeted by Susie the receptionist to keep up appearances and to entertain for an additional thirty minutes as they continued to prepare. Even though the prisoners were only allowed two visitors, for ten minutes while the guards watched, the families left content. Rumors begin to circulate that prisoner 8612 was planning to come back with a crowd and force the release of the remaining prisoners. Zimbardo had no choice but to send the students to another location, in case anyone showed up. Even though no one showed up, someone was going to pay for the hard work that the guards put in. With no surprise, day four came with an increase in humiliation, dehumanization and more unnecessary punishment to the prisoners. On top of regular work, they were forced to shine the guard’s shoes. The guards were taking their roles in the experiment very seriously. They were not tolerating any disrespect and had no problems asserting their superiority over the prisoners. Almost everyone was falling in line and accepting their order except prisoner 819. He did not partipcate in the 6 am count and refused to exercise. Going even further, he trashed his cell and barricaded himself in. He was not punished by himself but also the other prisoners. Eventually, he was thrown into the hole. A priest came to visit, and accessed the situation. Prisoner 819 agreed to meet with him, and broke down. It was so severe that he was taken away to be comforted with food and rest. The priest advised them that their stimulation was very convincing and was similar to a prison with first time offenders. Around 11:30 pm the guards gathered the…

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even "good" people can be beaten down by conditions, such as those simulated in the experiment, to a point where they are no longer sure of their own identity. If anything, this experiment should have taught players in the criminal justice system just how desperately prison reform is needed. Sadly, conditions such as these continue to persist and have even been the cause of recent controversy as seen in the instances of Abu Ghrab and Guantanamo Bay prisons.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Experiments have been done for many more years than humans can count on the two hands in which they possess. Two experiments, in particular, were written, “The Stanford Prison Experiment” by Philip G. Zimbardo and “The Perils of Obedience” by Stanley Milgram. These experiments can be controversial for many different reasons, but neither of these experiments were completed under conditions of normality. The information collected in these experiments isn’t exactly based off of real life situations, it becomes difficult not to question the relevance of these experiments.…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    J O N AT H A N, V I N E E T H , J A K E , R O H I T…

    • 359 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this experiment a simulated prison was created where college students were recruited for a two week study and paid $15 a day to either be a prison guard or an inmate. “After a day or two in which the volunteers self-consciously “played” their roles, the simulation became real-too real.” (Social Psychology) The guards took their roles too seriously and “devised cruel and degrading routines.” (Social Psychology) After only six days, the experiment got out of hand and was forced to be shut down. The experiment showed that situational factors powerfully affected human behaviors. This was shown by the many inmates that broke down and had emotional breakdowns and left the experiment because the prison guards took it too far when given a position of authority. The individuals in the experiment were deindividualized and no longer had any self-awareness of what they were doing within the group. Zimbardo’s Experiment clearly showed that “people will readily conform to the social roles they are expected to play, especially if the roles are so strongly stereotyped as those of the prison guards.” (McLeod, Zimabardo - Stanford Prison Experiment,…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays