Standing with the International Community Against Genocide

Topics: World War II, United Nations, United States Pages: 4 (1502 words) Published: May 6, 2013
A reigning topic of discussing in the United States is our involvement in the International Community and the prevention of genocide. Many options have been considered, but there is currently no official solution for the debate of joining or not. Some of the deciding factors regard whether or not it will assist the economy, military, and legal standpoints of the United States. If the United States joins together with the International Community, the economy will benefit from the support efforts, the military will benefit with the production of war supplies and technology, and from a legal standpoint, and it will ensure the human rights of all people. By joining the International Community, the United States’ economy would not be directly affected if genocide would occur that needs to be stopped. “In the beginning of the war, 1941, the national income was around $95 billion, but by 1944, it rose to $150 billion” (World War). During World War II, the income rates drastically went up, due to the financial support of war allies. These income rates include house and financial incomes for the average family. “The Employment Act of 1946 stated as government policy "to promote maximum employment, production, and purchasing power"(World). In 1946, the Employment Act was drafted to improve the employment of the average man, as well as employment for women. As most of the men went off to war, the women stayed behind and worked, which created a great workforce for the country. “Wars have influenced technological developments. Above all, recurring war has improved markets and economic growth” (Remember). Although engaging in war is not always the answer, being involved in war with other countries can lead to technology advances. If the United States joins together with a country that may have a new type of technology, the military can learn from that and gain new sources of weaponry, as well as benefit the trade and economy of the United States. A valid argument against the...

Cited: “Fact Sheet: A Comprehensive Strategy and New Tools to Prevent and Respond to Atrocities.” Whitehouse.gov. White House. Office of the Press Secretary. Web. 17 April 2013.
“Genocide Prevention Task Force.” Uspi.org. United States Institute of Peace. Web. 17 April 2013
“International Law in the Modern Context.” Fds.oup.org. Web. 17 April 2013.
“Prevention of Rwandan Genocide.” Trincol.edu. Trincol. Web. 17 April 2013
"Responsibility to Protect." STAND. Stand, 2013. Web. 17 April 2013.
“Remember: There Was Genocide in the United States, Too.” Todaymedianetwork.org. Indian Country. Web. 17 April 2013.
“The United States vs. the International Community: Are their two approaches towards the eradication of terrorism compatible?” Sam.gov. Noelle Quenivet. Web. 17 April 2013.
"United States Should Join the International Criminal Court." The Progressive. Pal, Amitabh. The Progressive, 1 Apr. 2010. Web. 17 April 2013.
“What is Genocide?” Ushmm.org. Untied State Holocaust Memorial Museum. Web. 17 April 2013.
“World War II: The Army.” Thehistory.army.gov. The History. May 2001. Web. 17 April 2013.
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Essay about International communities
  • Genocide Essay
  • Discrimination Against Marginalized Community Essay
  • War Crimes and the International Community Essay
  • international business Essay
  • Genocide Research Paper
  • Genocide Research Paper
  • Genocide Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free