Preview

St. Thomas on the Nature of Human Action

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
5630 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
St. Thomas on the Nature of Human Action
INTRODUCTION

In moral theory, understanding the concept of human action is significant. While contemporary moral philosophers tend to address these subjects as discrete topics of study, St. Thomas Aquinas’s treatment of them yields a bracing, comprehensive view of the moral life. Though at times it is not necessary for someone to be a trained moralist just to determine whether an act is good or bad, in some cases, this task can be challenging. Essential to identifying a correct moral action is recognizing what in this action is relevant to making this determination. The following essay will focus on the role of the reason and will to human, voluntariness, a feature that distinguishes human acts from acts of a different kind, and specifications of human actions and the cardinal virtues that govern actions and guide conducts according to faith and reason. All actions that are conducive to the attainment of man’s final end are considered morally good. Thus, an account on this ultimate end of human acts will be illustrated on the grounds of Aquinas’ writings.

THE NATURE OF HUMAN ACTION

An action is human just as it is rational for it was stated that through reason, man is the master of his acts. However, in order to fully understand the nature of human action and the end in which an action is aimed, we must understand what consists rationality. In the second part of Summa Theologiae, Aquinas explains that reason in comprised of two powers: the cognitive and the appetitive. The cognitive power of reason refers to the intellect. This power enables us to know, understand and apprehend the goodness a thing has. The appetitive power is the will. This power responds to the intellect’s judgment of what is good or choice worthy. Aquinas holds the superiority of the intellect over the will. The first formal principle is universal being and truth which is the object of the intellect and therefore by this kind of notion the intellect moves the will, as presenting its object



Bibliography: Aquinas, St Thomas. Commentary on Aristotle’s Nichomachean Ethics. Notre Dame, IN: Dumb Ox Books, 1993 Aquinas, St Thomas. Disputed Questions on the Virtues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005 Aquinas, St. Thomas. The Summa Theologiae. Westminster, MD: Christian Classics, 1981 Bourke, Vernon Brock, Stephen. Action and Conduct: Thomas Aquinas and the Theory of Action. T & T Clark International, 1998 “Cardinal Virtues.” New Advent, http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/03343a.htm Clark, Mary. An Aquinas Reader. NY: Fordham University Press, 2000 Elders, Leo Frankfurt am Main, NY: Peter Lang, 2005 Finnis, John St. Dunstan University, 1949 Magee, Joseph Pilsner, Joseph. The Specification of Human Actions in St. Thomas Aquinas. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Eth316 Week 1 Assignment

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ethical progress is a handy tool in today’s world and with this process is the foundation or ground zero of explaining of believes which people follow. In this essay, the discussion that will be explained is the similarities and difference between deontological ethics theories, virtue theory, and utilitarianism. Summarizing on someone’s personal experience, this will be discussed of the commonality between values, virtue, and moral.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The age-old problem of the existence of evil and the question of free will is not just a modern-day exercise for theologians. Aquinas addressed these issues in his day and age and author Timothy Renick, in Aquinas for Armchair Theologians, provides a quite excellent explanation of how Aquinas attempted to answer the fore-mentioned issues. This paper will review Renick’s endeavor to enlighten us on how Thomas Aquinas’ answers to evil and free will are foundational to theology. The first question Renick addresses is the one of evil’s existence. To understand Aquinas, one must hold the Biblical account of Genesis as true.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Additionally, the reasons which God uses are disassociated from God - as they consider things such as pain, mercy and love. Consequently, it seems that moral reasoning based on God has been abandoned in order to prevent God’s commands from being arbitrary, making him much less relevant to the overall moral picture. A voluntarist might wish to respond that the reasons which God considers are not sufficient on their own to make a moral conclusion. Thus, we might imagine that these reasons play an important part in the understanding of morality, but God’s commands ultimately play an essential role. (Quinn, 1978:…

    • 1806 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aquinas developed the Natural law Theory, with which he proposed five ‘telos’ that he believed were our duty to follow. His 5 primary precepts- ‘Worship God Ordered society, Reproduction, Learning and Defend the innocent’ are deontological. However, whilst being deontological, Natural Law does have some flexibility with the more teleological, secondary precepts.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In this essay it is required to compare and contrast the similarities and the differences between three major ethical viewpoints or theories. The three that will be explained are virtue theory, utilitarianism and deontological ethics. Since its revival in the twentieth century, virtue ethics have been broadly termed for a theory that focuses on the role of character and virtue in moral judgment. Most virtue ethics theories take their inspiration from Aristotle who said that a virtuous person is anyone who has ideal or good character traits. This theory judges a person on their character rather than an action that at some times maybe different from their normal behavior.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Aquinas proposes a number of laws that exist in the world. He believes that God is responsible for eternal law. Aquinas points out that eternal law the way the universe is structured. He understands that a rational being must exist, who is responsible for the structure of the universe, and that rational being must be God. This category of law applies to all things in the universe ranging from rocks to human beings. All of these things have natural tendencies that…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * Write a 350- to 700-word essay comparing the similarities and differences between virtue theory, utilitarianism, and deontological ethics. Include the following in your essay:…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    We think that all actions are sound as long as they don’t hurt another person. But then we see people like Adolf Hitler. The man murdered millions of people. Yet, he had a bunch of supporters who helped him with these inhumane acts. But he did what he did in the name of morality, in the name of ‘respect for the greater race.’ The central idea of this essay is that morality depends largely on perception. What one finds wrong may not necessarily be seen as inappropriate by another. “I followed my own conscience.” “I did what I thought was right.” Didion questions the reader how many madmen have said this and meant it? Didion doesn’t believe that these men shelter themselves under the illusion of morality but actually believe their actions are moral and justified. Maybe we ourselves have said it before and been wrong. Our conscience isn’t always the best judge of things. But the concept of morality makes it okay to just be impulsive and do what we think is correct in the…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aquinas believed he had discovered, through his observation of nature, the correct path you had to take if you were to fulfil your purpose. To help others to follow this path he created 5 rules called the “5 Primary Principles” and if you followed them you where ensured a “good” life, this was called following the synderesis rule. The 1ST primary principle is to live, the 2nd primary principle is…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    moral action in duty for its own sake, the other in the maximization of human happiness;…

    • 136 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Emotion in Hamlet

    • 5223 Words
    • 21 Pages

    Gilson. Etienne. The Christian Philosophy of St. Thomas Aquinas. Trans. L. K. Shook. New York: Octagon, 1956.…

    • 5223 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aquinas Vs Hobbes

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages

    As a theologian, Aquinas believes the supreme good derives from the eternal God, rather than a worldview good. The Natural Law theory is central to his work because it connects Aristotle’s argument and harmonizes it with the Church teachings. Unlike Aristotle, Aquinas believed the city was a mean to reach the ultimate end, which is God’s will. In his broad conception of explaining laws human beings should obey, the most virtuous ones are derived from God, not from man. He articulates the principle of obedience and how each person is obligated to perform their duties to society. This also is a slight critic from Aristotle’s teaching. Aquinas stressed the significance of duties, rather than performing deeds. Even though both words are relative to preserving and protecting the city, the teaching of obligations solidity the expectations of moral…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phil 3033

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Kant’s moral theory begins from the starting point of the good will. In assessing the moral worth on an action we must focus not on the consequences of results of the action, but on the agent’s will ( the motivation of conducting an action is really important).…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This essay aims to argue the views of two different theorist, Jeremy Bentham and Immanuel Kant, with regards to their views on moral worth of an action. The idea of good and bad creates heated debates among many, but this essay will successfully unravel the layers of Bentham’s theory of Utilitarianism and his belief that all our motives are driven by pleasure and pain. While arguing Kant’s opposing argument that moral worth of an act revolves around democratic attitudes, and that moral truths are founded on reasons that is logical to all people. When one breaks down both theories, it occurs that Kant’s theory comes out to be the more sensible one in numerous aspects.…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    kant

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Kant’s diagnoses the human condition as human’s frailty and impurity when distinguishing between one’s self interested inclinations and moral duty. Humans were “…finite beings with our individual needs…yet we [were] also rational beings, and for Kant that include[d]…the recognition of moral obligations” (Stevenson and Haberman p.155). The contrast and ever-apparent strain between these opposing sides of human nature fuel Kant’s diagnosis of human’s frailty. In Kant’s conception of human reason and action, he distinguished between categorical and hypothetical imperatives which displayed the human struggles regarding what decisions were morally right. Self interested desires, “…which involve[ed] only the selection of means to satisfy one’s own desire” (p.151) could be defined as a hypothetical imperative. However, categorical imperative claims “…that morality is fundamentally a function of [one’s] reason, not just [one’s] feelings” (p.151). Knowing what was morally right and doing what was morally right was the depravity of human nature, the choice of choosing one’s own happiness over their obligations to those who surround them. The desire for instant gratification from any action hinders human’s consideration of longer-term self-interest. The difficulty arises when the one must decide to postpone immediate satisfaction in the interest of future goals; a “…balance to strike between living for the moment and planning for the future….” (p.155) must be reached. Human’s struggles with moral decisions and personal gain exemplify their…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays