Preview

Spanish Essay- the Death Penalty

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1295 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Spanish Essay- the Death Penalty
La profundidad de la humanidad: La pena de muerte

La percepción social de las acciones criminales que ocurren en nuestra sociedad está creada por medio de las noticias, los periódicos, y los otros medios de comunicación, cuyo objeto es manipular e interpretar las circunstancias de cada cuestión. La legalidad y la imposición de la pena de muerte es una de varias preguntas controversiales que existen en el mundo de hoy. Más recientemente, en el año 2005, la gente estaba enfocada en el caso de Michael Morales, donde su ejecución fue postergada indefinidamente. Otra vez, este caso provocó el discurso sobre la utilización de la pena de muerte en nuestra sociedad. Mientras parece que este caso se trata de la legalidad de la pena de muerte y el uso de la inyección para ejecutar a un ser humano, en realidad este caso de asesinato tiene más que ver con la protección de los testigos a la cruel verdad y no a los derechos del criminal.
Por el paso de tiempo, es muy interesante ver como los pensamientos de nuestra sociedad sobre la pena de muerte han cambiados. En un país donde era común ahorcar a sus ciudadanos, como en los juicios de las brujas en Salem, Massachussets, ahora la idea de castigar a uno por medio de la pena de muerte es algo muy controversial. La práctica del castigo capital en los Estados Unidos, como ha sido probado por la controversia actual del caso de Michael Morales, nunca podrá ser considerada humana. Cameron Sturdevant, un activista con la campaña para terminar la pena de muerte dijo, "As it turns out, trained medical professionals agree that there is no humane way to murder someone" (Terzakis). Sin embargo, después de violar, batir, apuñalar, y finalmente matar a Terri Winchell, una muchacha de diecisiete años, uno pensaría que cualquier concepto de la humanidad sería retirado del cuadro. Cuando entramos en la sociedad civilizada, somos limitados por ciertas distinciones que uno percibiría como moral, y por supuesto, lo que no está

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The eighth amendment is designed to protect us from cruel and unusual punishment. Conservation of the United States Constitution, and all moral ideologies have been set aside. An old form of barbaric punishment and the saying "eye for an eye" is still being widely accepted by Americans today. The old form of barbaric punishment is capital punishment. No matter how "humane" the death penalty has become, it is still the killing of another human being. When people stand outside prisons and cheer that an individual was murdered, there is a problem. When people justify the killing of another person, there is a problem. Capital Punishment is irrefutably murder, and murder is never justified.…

    • 1951 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After reading, Governing Immigration Through Crime and The Devil’s Highway: A True Story, I have developed a better understanding of the relationship between immigration and crime. Personally, many of my sentiments towards immigration has been quite underdeveloped and lacking sustenance to support my claims. In regards, to the criminal aspect connected to immigration, my opinion was more based on feelings alone and not facts. However, I still stand by some of my views and beliefs even after reading both texts about immigration and crime. I gained new information on this topic based on the fundamental concepts and theories that were presented to me in Governing Immigration Through Crime. Moreover, this paper will analyze three concepts discussed Governing Immigration Through Crime while using material from The Devil’s Highway: A True Story to support the perspectives presented by each theme. Lastly, I will conclude this paper with how Urrea writing was able to contribute to the debate on immigration and crime within the public.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The legal practices and interpretation take place in a social setting, where the criminal laws are a result of the political processes detailing to their enforcement. Hence, these justice practices of criminal law scholars co-exist and complement the moral and social aspect of criminology studied by criminologists.…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty is an extremely vital way of the criminal justice system. The punishment of death can help decrease crime rates. Also, this way of death can lessen the amount of criminals and give families closure. It gives closure because, the families now know that this person will never be able to hurt them or anyone else ever again. The death penalty is a very good way to end many troubles within the U.S.…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are not many absolute truths in the world. Almost every point can be argued and justified. But if there is one truth universally recognized, one truth upon which societies the world over have been based on, it is that murder is wrong. The willful termination of a life is immoral. If we as a society accept that to be true, how then can we condone the death penalty? How is government sanctioned murder a moral option? The legal system is not fool proof, nothing man-made is. How then can we claim that an imperfect court of law, pervious to human error and persuasion, has the power to lay down the most perfectly irreversible solution of them all: death. Even after the appellate courts have been exhausted, it is possible for an innocent person to be convicted of a crime they did not do. If there is even that small possibility, how can we, in all good conscious, make it legal to put someone to…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Retribution is the theory that the mandate to pay an offender back for his or her wrongdoing (pg. 6 Cullen). Conservatives lean in favor of this approach while liberals favor what is called “just deserts.” The difference between the two is that retribution is has the goal of ensuring that the offender endures the pain they have caused. Just desert want the offender to suffer no more than the pain caused. They wish to see that justice is served but not more than that which is truly deserved. One punishment that is considered retribution rather than rehabilitative is the death penalty. The argument that this punishment is more retribution is that the offender should suffer the same harm to which his or her inflicted on the victim. They see the…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Today, the death penalty is an issue that has raised many questions in regards to its morality. Many people believe that the death penalty is immoral for a number of factors, some of which being the execution of innocents, the arbitrary application of the death penalty, and the racial and economic discrimination with the system. Many others believe that the death penalty is moral, for it gives people what they deserve, the criminals were fully aware of the consequences that may fall upon them, and that justice is being served for the victims and families of the victims still suffering from the actions of the criminal. In this paper I will argue that from a Deontological standpoint, the death penalty is morally just. To do this, I will first describe the basics of the theory of Deontology in general, so that you, the reader, can begin to understand some of the fundamental beliefs that Kant, the father of Deontology,…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A sixteen- year-old is prosecuted in adult court and is given the life sentence without any chance at parole. He doesn’t understand what is happening. His brain isn’t developed like any adults, nor does her comprehend the court surroundings. He is practically a victim to the justice system as he is being treated the same as a thirty-year-old criminal. Any offender under the age of twenty-one should be separated from adults in the justice system.…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today I came across a discussion on the death penalty on a progressive Facebook page. The post was in favor of execution, which was interesting to me because this is not the progressive position. In fact progressive position is staunchly opposed to the death penalty.…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital punishment is an issue that has been used to handle severe crimes in nearly every country either now or in the past. Even though I understand both sides of capital punishment, I can not morally say that it's good. Though many say that the death penalty is the only way to go , it can not be justified because it is not morally correct to punish people with death.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death Penalty Bias Essay

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Have you ever noticed how the majority of the U.S. population is in favor of the death penalty when it comes to murderers, abusers and child molesters, but as soon as its someone they know or love sentenced suddenly they claim “it’s too harsh!” or “They would never do that!” and then they’re against using the death penalty? There are certainly specific crimes that deserve the death penalty but sentencing those convicted of unforgivable crimes is just giving them an easy way out, but it does save tax payers the millions of dollars per year to accommodate the criminals on death row.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Picture this, a murderer has been caught by the police, someone who has killed another human being for self benefit. Should they get the death penalty, or be put in prison for the rest of their life? Do we really need the death penalty and is it good, or should we pitch it and use life in prison for murders and other inhumane crimes? These questions are being more and more asked throughout America every day, what's the answer? The simple answer is yes, we need to keep the death penalty, and here's why. The first reason is the death penalty is less cruel than life imprisonment, It also lowers crime rate and gives actual justice to the victims and their families. Some of these things you might not…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This documentation continues by adding, that all humans shall be treated with dignity, respect and refrain from cruel punishment. It is for this reason, many see the death penalty as an immoral and unnatural act against human beings. Government officials stand firm to the belief that the death penalty deters the number of criminal. However, due to an absence of scientific and literary reports these findings are false. According to research, the death penalty has little to no effect on the solution to those convicted of violent crimes (Capital Punishment, 2011).…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Thesis Statement: Research suggests that capital punishment should be abolished to obviate mishandled executions, prevent wrongfully convicted citizens from being put to death and to lower taxpayer dollars for incurred expenses for inmates on death row.…

    • 2185 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another argument is that death penalty is not a constraining factor. The most common argument for death penalty says that this measure of punishment is a strong restraining factor, since killing of a felon keeps others from committing similar crimes. At a first glance, this argument seems quite reasonable. However, it is important to approach the question of death penalty less disconcertingly. Effectiveness margins exist not only in death penalty, but also in other types of punishment, and that is not always taken into account ("Arguments for and Against the Death Penalty.").…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics