Preview

Source 2 And 3 Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1198 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Source 2 And 3 Essay
With reference to Sources 2 and 3 and your understanding of the historical context, which of these two sources is more valuable in explaining why the Soviet Union wanted to establish control over Eastern European States?

Source 3 by Stalin is more valuable than Source 2 by Churchill in explaining why the Soviet Union wanted to establish control over Eastern European States. Churchill does not ‘directly’ state any reasons why the Soviet Union wanted to establish control over Eastern European States. Stalin’s speech’s topic is basically explaining this. In order to come to a conclusion, it is important to analyse the historical context of the sources, whilst also considering who it is addressed to and what the emphasis of the Sources is.

I
…show more content…
Source 2 is an extract from the Iron Curtain Speech from Churchill given by him in the US to the American people including President Truman in March 1946. The content was basically him warning them for the aggressive Soviet expansion as much of the people still believed the Soviet Union to be an ally after defeating Nazi-Germany together. He said the following “(…) an Iron Curtain has descended across the Continent [Europe]. Behind the line lie all the capitals of the ancient states of the ancient states of Central and Eastern Europe.” He believes that what the Soviets are doing at that moment divides Europe in to spheres, and wants to convince the Americans that they have to stop them. Source 3 itself is an extract from Stalin’s interview that was a response to the Iron Curtain Speech. It was published in the controversial [It was controlled by the Soviet government. So it would never be critical about the government and not objective at all. You could say the government used this newspaper to bring out political news and propaganda.] Soviet newspaper, Pravda. It was a very reliable source for official government views, but the content never stated something critical of the Soviet government. Stalin said the following “Mr Churchill now stands as a firebrand of war.” The Iron Curtain Speech made him believe Churchill was plotting with the Americans against the Soviet Union and implies that Churchill would be responsible if it came to a war. They are both valuable in this aspect, but Churchill was negative of the Soviet Union in his words, while Stalin somewhat explained what and why the Soviet Union did what they

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    John Lewis Gaddis Summary

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this book writer, John Lewis Gaddis has talked about how Russia and eastern Europe are changing the way history specialists take a gander at the icy war. The primary contention that was made by the writer in this book was " How Soviet's perspective of one-sided security crashed into US's conviction that security is multilateral to create two ranges of prominence: one of compulsion and one of assent." The Partners Atlantic Contract, August 1941,Roosevelt, and Churchill announced 3 Wilsonian after war goals to guarantee global security through a multilateral approach: self-assurance, open market, and aggregate security. Stalin had firmly connected state security with his very own security and trusted security must be accomplished by denying every other person of it and picking up an area while the US thought of security as an aggregate decent inescapable clash.…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lit1 Task 2 Essay Example

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages

    to take medical leave when the employee is unable to work because of a serious health condition;…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    After watching the Communist takeover in Eastern Europe, the former British prime minister Winston Churchill coined a phrase to describe what had happened. On March 5, 1946, in a speech delivered in Fulton, Missouri, Churchill referred to an “iron curtain” falling across Eastern Europe. The press picked up the term, and for the next 43 years, it described the Communist nations of Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union. With the Iron Curtain separating Eastern Europe from the West, the World War II era had come to an end. The Cold War was about to…

    • 1743 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ww1 Unit 3

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages

    - Soviet Position: Russia was intent on imposing communist. Stalin brought down an “Iron Curtain” (Churchill’s phrase) across Europe from the Baltic to the Adriatic and created a series of satellite governments.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gaddis Cold War Summary

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Gaddis re-examines the Cold War with new information from all around the globe, creating a “new” cold war history. Gaddis pinpoints the start of the Cold War as 1947 and notes “the regime, personality, and ideological explanations for the Cold War point to an underlying defensive motivation: the need to expand and assert control to save Stalin and the Soviet Union.” (Lebow, p.628) Gaddis also sustains that Stalin’s personality and paranoia influenced events. It seems the “new” cold war history is actually the same as the “old” cold war standpoint because Gaddis concluded: “who then was responsible [for the Cold War]? The answer, I think, is authoritarianism in general, and Stalin in particular.” (Gaddis, p.294)…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    dbq on ww2

    • 780 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In order to prove itself as being more powerful than the United States, the Soviet Union spread its form of government to other countries around the world—whether by using force or by aiding the creation of communist governments. The maps in Doc 1 and Doc 7 illustrate the Soviets’ desire to spread communism, not just to their satellite nations around them, but even farther to Vietnam. It would have been helpful to add a map of the communist and non-communist countries in Europe before WWII to compare to Doc 1 in order to highlight the amount of control the USSR gained trying to beat the US in the Cold War. Documents 3 and 9 suggest that, aside from a few rebels, Hungary and Nicaragua welcomed the Soviets’ help in switching to communism and training communist soldiers. However, docs 2 and 9 offer contradictory viewpoints which suggest that Russian invaded their countries and unwillingly coerced a communist government on them, when the Hungarian radio station says, “Early this morning Soviet troops launched a general attack on Hungary,” (Doc 2) and when Violeta Chamorro in doc 10 calls for Nicaraguans to fight for freedom by, “burying Communism and proclaiming democracy.” Doc 3 was a broadcast on a Moscow radio station, so it portrays the USSR as being in control so that the citizens of the Soviet Union will support their government. Although it biased against the USSR, doc 2 probably more accurately describes how Hungary was affected by the Soviets’ goal of the Cold War to be more powerful than the US. Doc 9 is relatively neutral, but since doc…

    • 780 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Assess the view that the disagreements about the Second Front were the most significant cause of tension between Russia and the West between 1941-5?…

    • 2524 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The single document that best illustrated American anti-communism and general suspicion of Soviet aspirations was George Kennan's famous Long Telegram of 1946. The Long Telegram was perhaps the most cited and most influential statement of the early years of the Cold War.…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Khrushchev’s vilification of Stalin in his address to the Twentieth Party Congress was meticulous in detailing precise failures of his predecessor’s rule. Above all, Khrushchev strongly elaborated on Stalin’s extremities, especially the cult of personality that he had built up over the years. The speech also in turn attacked ‘Stalinist repressions, arrests, terror and murders…[and] for bungling foreign affairs and mishandling the war’. Despite this, Khrushchev was cautious in limiting his other criticisms of Stalin, and it was this focus on him as an individual rather than of the overall Soviet system that defined the boundaries of acceptable criticism. As such, the speech sought to condemn Stalin without endangering the party’s validity or the system that had indeed allowed Khrushchev to rise to power.…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay 3

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Nomads were wanderers that had no technical home. Four groups of nomads were the Turks, Afghan and Seljuk, the Vikings, the Mongols, and the Huns. When the Mongols went to Europe, they brought the Bubonic Plague; they caused the reunification of the Russians, and helped start Pax Mongolica. They allowed the conquered to keep their ways of life and religions as long as they obeyed the foreign rulers. The decentralization of Japan and Western Europe was helpful and a hindrance by being more organized, using feudalism and causing more chaos.…

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    essay 2

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What are the typical stereotypes associated with those who have tattoos, piercings, or other body adornments?…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    setting up in that part of the world was something the United States could live with.” The US was rather more concerned for a mutual benefit and wanted a working relation with the USSR. The U.S. were most interested in the west Europe, they wanted to introduce there ideology, demarcation, by trying not to collaborate, “,” Roosevelt-style—that is, by trying to work hand-in-hand with each other on whatever problems turned up. Instead, they could get along by pulling apart.…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Primary Source Essay

    • 2418 Words
    • 10 Pages

    In my point of view, history portrays the past. While reading a American history book, people would only focus on the essential events that trigger their emotions; however, they should recognize the American history are dominated by three elements- race, class, and gender. In the rest of the assignment, I would use several primary sources documents to analyze how gender had made a big impact in the American history. It would signify the hardships that women endured in different period of time which began with women proclaimed the right to vote; next, young girls opened to the environment and worked in urban areas; then, the success of women suffrage; lastly, losing their own identity.…

    • 2418 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Essay 3

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Drew Hayden Taylor’s “This Boat Is My Boat” and Naomi Klein’s “Local Foreign Policy” are similar in several ways as both essays talk about marketing. Despite the fact that the authors of the stories are from different regions of the world, the message that is sent in their essays is about exploitation. As a result, in both essays, the authors talked about the exploitation, the history of the products and the solutions.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Color Curtain

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Major debates of the conference centered on the question of whether or not Soviet procedure in eastern Europe and Central Asia should be denounced,…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays