Comment on Freudian Psychoanalysis theory:. Freud starts his mission in the world of psychology with the treatment of hysteria which according to him was caused by sexual desire but unfortunately this was not acknowledged by his mentor Dr. Joseph Breuer under whose guidance Freud learnt about hysteria. This presupposition about psychological diseases was one of the bases of Freud’s sex theories. Besides, he had a guess or assumption of the division of human brain and its functions. He strongly believed and popularized the idea of conscious versus unconscious mind. In his hypothesis, the conscious mind is what one is aware of at any particular moment like someone’s present perceptions, memories, thoughts, fantasies, feelings etc.; and preconscious mind is what closely works with the conscious mind or it is the memory that is not presently conscious but can be made conscious easily. According to Freud, these two are the smallest parts of brain the largest part is what he called the unconscious mind. In Freud’s view this unconscious level of mind is the source of man’s motivations such as desires for sex, food and so on, Furthermore, Freudian psychology is largely based on objects that are guided by needs; hunger, thirst, the avoidance of pain and sex. Dr. C. Boeree comments that “When everyone thought of male and female as roles determined by nature or God, he showed how much they depended on family dynamics.” Hence, Freud’s thoughts are supposed to be guided by desires. To him these desires are the fundamental factors of human life and psyche other than any spiritual and moral functions. According to Freud, among the objects organism is the prime one whose important part is nervous system which is known as id at beginning. This id transforms the needs of organism into motivational forces which Freud called wishes. Here there is a great contradiction regarding this id. Dr. C. Boeree says “The infant, in the Freudian view, is pure or nearly pure id” Now question comes if a child’s id is pure how does he or she possess sexual complexity or desire which causes him to envy his father even to wish death for him?
It is a well-known fact that the human brain has both some conscious and some unconscious feelings and functions but the question is whether the brain is naturally divided or not? Or does there truly exist any unconscious level of mind which lays the foundation for sexual desire? If it is true with empirical evidence then Freud can have a universal appeal, otherwise modern psychology and civilization have to reconsider and be careful about its disastrous effect on them. According to Dr. C. Boeree “Behaviorists, humanists, and existentialists all believe that: (a) the motivations and problems that can be attributed to the unconscious are much fewer than Freud thought, and (b) the unconscious is not the great churning cauldron of activity he made it out to be. Most of the modern psychologists today see the unconscious as whatever we don't need or don't want to see. Some theorists don't use the concept at all”, . Carl Jung, another famous psychologist, says that it is the concept of unconscious which has made Freud nothing but puny. The conscious is on the other hand a function or feeling of brain not its level or part. There is no separation or any separate parts in brain known as conscious, unconscious and preconscious. All Freudian movement is run based on this concept, actually it is nothing but a scheme. Professor Joseph Jastrow in his prominent work Freud: his Dream and Sex Theories gives a rather rational evaluation of unconscious mind hypothesis of Freud. He says that unconscious is the fundamental source of Freudian psychology. All Freudian movement is run based on this concept, actually it is nothing but a scheme .The fundamental question is here cheated. If we accept this then we may also accept the ancient concept of ghost, applied by Morceress for the treatment of hysteria. Though Freud got some...
Bibliography: A. Gang Zhu. Twentieth Century Western Critical Theories[M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press, 2001, P106.
            D.H. Lawrence. Sons and Lovers[M]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 1994. P112, P112, P112, P318, P239, P318, P502, P318, P318, P279, P279, P279.
 D.H. Lawrence. Sons and Lovers[M]. London: Banton Books, inc, 1985. P264.
 Huxley, Aldous (ed.). The Letters of D. H. Lawrence[Z]. London: Willium Heinenann, 1932. P78-79.
 Alastair Naven. D.H. Lawrence: The Novels[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978, P40.
 D.H. Lawrence. Selected Essays[M] England: Penguin Books, 1950, P119.
B. Boeree. Dr. C. George. 2006. Personality Theories e-text book.
C. Freud, Sigmund. 1913. Interpretation of Dream, 3rd edition. Translation in English: Macmillan. Franz Deuticke, Leipzig & Vienna. Germany.
G. Lawrence, D. H. 1985. Sons and Lovers London: Banton Books.
H. Rahim, Moulana Mohammad Abdur. 2002. Pashchatto Sobhyotar Dharshonic Bhitthi (Philosophical Ground of Western Civilization). Khairun Prokashoni, Dhaka.
I. Safra, Jacob E. 1768. The New Encyclopaedia Britannica, 15th Edition, Volume: 8, Chicago.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document