Soldiering. Out of Taylorism Came Fordism, Another Popular Scientific Management School of Thought, Fordism Is Credited with Introducing Taylorian Principles to...

Topics: Leadership, Management, Servant leadership Pages: 15 (4999 words) Published: February 28, 2013
Journal of International Business and Cultural Studies

THE CROSS-CULTURAL LEADER: THE APPLICATION OF SERVANT LEADERSHIP THEORY IN THE INTERNATIONAL CONTEXT Maureen Hannay Troy University ABSTRACT Leadership theories have evolved from a focus on traits, to behaviors, to contingency theories, to more contemporary approaches including servant leadership theory. This paper provides an overview of the principles of servant leadership and identifies characteristics displayed by servant leaders in the workplace, with special emphasis on the importance of empowerment in defining a servant-leader. It also addresses the application of servant leadership in a cross-cultural context utilizing Hofstede’s five cultural dimensions as a framework. This paper concludes that servant leadership is best applied in a culture with low power distance, low to moderate individualism, low to moderate masculinity, low uncertainty avoidance and a moderate to high long-term orientation. Key Words: Servant Leadership, Hofstede’s cultural dimensions, cross-cultural management, empowerment, leadership styles

The Cross-Cultural Leader, Page 1

Journal of International Business and Cultural Studies

Introduction Leadership has been and continues to be a topic of considerable interest in the management literature. While there is no universal definition of leadership, there is agreement on the fact that leadership involves an influencing process between leaders and followers to ensure achievement of organizational goals. Early studies in the area of leadership focused mainly on trait theories in the hopes of identifying the personality characteristics of the ideal leader. When they proved unsuccessful, research moved on to the examination of behaviors that would differentiate leaders from followers. But again, researchers were unable to define a universal theory of leadership. Contingency theories, which essentially said that the most effective leadership style depended on the situation, the followers, and the leaders, replaced the search for the “one best” leadership style. More recent research has focused on charismatic and transformational theories of leadership. This paper discusses the application of another contemporary theory of leadership, servant leadership theory, and examines its application in the cross-cultural context. An Overview of Servant Leadership Before discussing the cross-cultural applications of servant leadership an overview of the basic philosophy and tenets behind the servant leadership model is necessary. In 1977 Robert Greenleaf introduced the concept of servant leadership. According to Greenleaf (1977) servant-leaders are driven to serve first, rather than to lead first, always striving to meet the highest priority needs of others. Greenleaf identified the principal motive of the traditional leader as being the desire to lead followers to achieve organizational objectives. On the other hand, the driving motivation of a servant-leader is to serve others to be all that they are capable of becoming. De Pree (1989) defines the nature of servant leadership as serving not leading. By serving others, leaders lead other people to the point of self-actualization. While most traditional leadership theories are behaviorally based, servant leadership emerges from a leader’s principles, values, and beliefs (Walker, 2003, p. 25). Before publishing his seminal work on servant leadership, Greenleaf spent 40 years in the business world as an executive at AT&T (Spears, 1996). Therefore his leadership model combined theoretical as well as practical principles regarding the most effective methods of influencing and developing followers. However, Greenleaf was certainly not the first to introduce the concept of servant leadership. Its origins are clearly traced back to the bible and stories of Jesus Christ. Service to followers is demonstrated in many of the acts Christ performed, most famously by his washing the feet of his disciples. In...

References: Argyris, C. (1998). Empowerment: The emperor’s new clothes. Harvard Business Review, 76(3), 98-105. Bass, B.M. (1990). Bass and Stogdill’s Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research, and Managerial Applications, 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Bass, B.M. (2000). The future of leadership in learning organizations. The Journal of Leadership Studies, 7(3), 19-40. Costigan, R.D., Ilter, S.S., & Berman, J.J. (1998). A multi-dimensional study of trust in organizations. Journal of Managerial Issues, 10(3), 39-52. Covey, S.R. (2006). Servant leadership: Use your voice to serve others. Leadership Excellence, 23(12), 5-6. De Pree, M. (1989). Leadership is an Art. New York: Dell Publishing. Ferch. S.R. (2004). Servant-leadership, forgiveness, and social justice. In Larry C. Spears and Michele Lawrence (Eds.), Practicing Servant Leadership: Succeeding Through Trust, Bravery, and Forgiveness. San Francisco: JosseyBass. Gibson, J.L, Ivancevich, J.M., Donnelly, J.H., & Konopaske, R. (2006). Organizations: Behavior, Structure and Processes. New York: McGraw-Hill. Greenleaf, R.K. (1977). Servant Leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. Mahway, NJ: Paulist Press. Hofstede, G. (1983). Dimensions of National Cultures in Fifty Countris and Three Regions”. In J. Deregowski, S. Dziurawiec, and R.C. Annis (Eds.), Expectations in Cross-Cultural Psychology. Lisse, Netherlands: Swets and Zeitilinger. Hofstede, G. (1993). Cultural constraints in management theories. Academy of Management Executive, 7(1), 81-94. Kolp A., & Rea, P. (2006). Leading with Integrity. Cincinnati, OH: Atomic Dog Publishing. Manz, C.C. (1998). The Leadership Wisdom of Jesus: Practical Lessons for Today. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers. Oster, M.J. (1991). Vision-driven Leadership. San Bernardino, CA: Here’s Life Publishers.
The Cross-Cultural Leader, Page 11
Journal of International Business and Cultural Studies
Ouchi, W. (1981). Theory Z: How American Business Can Meet the Japanese Challenge. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Pollard, C.W. (1996). The Soul of the Firm. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing Pollard, C.W. (1997, September/October). The leader who serves. Strategy and Leadership, 49-51. Russell, R.F. (2001). The role of values in servant leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 22(2), 76-83. Russell, R.F., & Stone, A.G. (2002). A review of servant leadership attributes: Developing a practical model. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 23(3), 145-157. Sanders, J.O. (1994). Spiritual Leadership. Chicago, IL: Moody Press Sendjaya, S., & Sarros, J.C. (2002). Servant leadership: Its origin, development, and application in organizations. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 9(2), 57-64. Spears, L. (1996). Reflections on Robert K. Greenleaf and servant-leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 17(7), 33-35. Stone, A.G., Russell, R.F., & Patterson, K. (2004). Transformational versus servant leadership: A difference in leader focus. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 25(4), 349-361. Walker, J. (2003). A new call to stewardship and servant leadership. Nonprofit World, 21(4), 25. Winston, B. (1999). Be a Manager for God’s Sake: Essays about the Perfect Manager. Virginia Beach, VA: Regent University School of Business
The Cross-Cultural Leader, Page 12
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Taylorism and Fordism Essay
  • Fordism Essay
  • Fordism Essay
  • Principles of Scientific Management Essay
  • Management School of Thought Essay
  • Differences of Fordism and Post-Fordism Essay
  • fordism Essay
  • Essay about Principles of Management

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free