|Software as a Service | | | |Perpetual versus SaaS sales licensing models | | | | | 2012 | | | | | | |
Efficient use of information technology (IT) can be a source of competitive advantage therefore software as a service (SaaS) has become an alternative to perpetual sales models as a means of reducing expenditure on IT. SaaS is a cloud enabled technology which evolved from applications service provider (ASP) and provisions software application services on a pay per use or subscription basis. No upfront investments on IT infrastructure or software is required as the service provider hosts, maintains, secures and upgrades the software as part of the service it charges users for. Future trends reflect that more IT users will be switching from the perpetual to SaaS model. Access to software applications is authorised by using software licenses which protect the rights of the software vendor (developer) against loss of revenue through piracy and protect the user from inadvertently violating the vendor’s rights and being fined. There are various types of software licenses that cater for perpetual and SaaS sales models and the use mechanisms to enforce the terms and conditions contained in the license. The benefits and pitfalls of using Saas reflect that the benefits outweigh pitfalls. This does not indicate that all IT users will benefit from adopting SaaS as perpetual models have features that will be more beneficial for their IT business solutions.
Software as a service
Characteristics of SaaS
SaaS product life cycle
SaaS software development
Why software licensing?
Perpetual and SaaS licensing models
Perpetual Licensing models
SaaS based licensing models
SaaS sales licensing models
Pay per use licenses
Based on the Subscription to the Functionalities
Free Software, Pay for Support licenses
Processor license - SaaS
Advantages and disadvantages of SaaS vs perpetual sales licensing models
Recommendations and conclusion
Increased competitiveness in markets is putting pressure on organisations to improve the productivity of their information technology by either reducing IT expenditure or getting more utility out of it (Robinson 2006:34). To this end organisations have been exploring and taking advantage of the alternatives available to procure their information technology (IT) software. Software procurement consists of transactions where the software author grants a software user permission to use the software under predetermined terms and conditions. The terms and conditions are presented in the form of a software license. (Gangadharan &...
References: Autocad. 2012. AutoCAD Services & Support. http://usa.autodesk.com/adsk/servlet/ps/dl/item?siteID=123112&id=16485462&linkID=9240617
Bontis, N. & Chung, H. 2000. The evolution of software pricing: from box licenses to application service provider models. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy. 10( 3): 246-255
Creece, G. 2010. SaaS vs. Software: The Pros and Cons of SaaS Pricing http://blogs.gartner.com/guy-creese/2010/05/24/saas-vs-software-the-pros-and-cons-of-saas-pricing/ Date of access 04 December 2012.
Dalheimer, M. and Pfreundt, F. 2009. GenLM: License Management for Grid and Cloud. Computing Environments. 9th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid:132-139.
Epping, D. 2009. Per processor licenses for your application. http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2009/06/04/per-processor-licenses-for-your-application/ Date of accedd 05 December 2012
Espadas, J., Molina, A., Jiménez, G., Molina, M., Ramírez, R
Ferrante, D. 2006. Software licensing models: what’s out there? IT Pro. November/December: 23-29.
Gangadharan,G.R. & D’Andrea, V. 2011. Managing copyrights and moral rights of service-based software. IEEE Software. March/ April:48-55
Gull, D & Wehrmann, A. 2009. Optimized Software Licensing – Combining License Types in a License Portfolio. Business & Information Systems Engineering. 4:277-288.
IBM. 2012. Processor Value Unit [PVU] licensing for Distributed Software. http://www-01.ibm.com/software/lotus/passportadvantage/pvu_licensing_for_customers.html#fullsubcap
Jiang, Z., Sun, W.,Tang, K., Snowdon, J.L
Ju, J.,Wang Y. ,Fu, J., Wu, J. & Lin, Z. 2010. Research on key technology in SaaS. Paper presented at the 2010 International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Cognitive Informatic, Kualar Lumpa, 22-23 June.
Juniper. 2012. Introduction to the Media Access Control (MAC) Layer 2 Sublayer. http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos/topics/concept/mac-qfx-series-understanding.html Date of access 21 November 2012.
Kaplan, J.M. 2007. SaaS: Friend Or Foe? Business communication review. June: 48-53.
Konary. A. 2012. Licensing for SaaS Applications: ISVs Take to the Cloud. http://www.tmcnet.com/tmc/whitepapers/white-paper.aspx?id=5970&Title=licensing-saas-applications-isvs-take-the-cloud Date of access 04 December 2012.
Laplante, P.A., Zhang, J.& Voas, J. 2008. What’s in a Name? Distinguishing between SaaS and SOA. IT Pro. May/June:46-50.
Lindman, J., Rossi, M. & Puustell, A. 2011. Matching open source software licenses with corresponding business models. IEEE Software. July/August 2011.
Matthew, M. & Nair, S. 2010. Pricing SaaS models: Perception of business service providers and clients. Journal of Services Research. 10(1):51-68.
Rohitratana, J and Altmann, J. 2012. Impact of pricing schemes on a market for Software-as-a-Service and perpetual software. Future Generation Computer Systems. 28:328–1339
Wong, P. 2012. Online Piracy an Keygens http://cosmos.ucdavis.edu/archives/2012/cluster4/Wong_Preston.pdf . Date accessed 30th November 2012
Yang, S., Yoo, B
Zsigri, C. 2008. D2.1 Software Licensing, Panorama Today. Version 1. Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community. http://www.smartlm.eu/fileadmin/SmartLM/user-data/D2.1_Software_Licensing_Panorama_Today.pdf Date accessed 01 December 2012.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document