Preview

Socrates V. Euthyphro: What Is Piety?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1125 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Socrates V. Euthyphro: What Is Piety?
Socrates v. Euthyphro: What Is Piety?
In Athens Greece, there was a very wise man considered by the Athenians who lived through the Periclean age (around 400 BC) and his name was Socrates. For most of his life time Socrates was a highly well respected philosopher; who loved teaching philosophy of life to anyone who listen in the street of Athens. All was dandy until his friend Chaerephon had told him that “He went to Delphi at one time and ventured to ask the oracle – as I say, gentlemen, don create a disturbance – he asked if any man was wiser than I, and the Phythian replied that no one was wiser” (Plato, p 26). During Socrates crusade of trying to find who was the wise man alive. Socrates oversteps his boundary and decries powerful men’s. Now these powerful men (Lycons, Meletus, and Anytus) started to dislike Socrates and his teaching; claiming that Socrates teaching is corrupting the minds of the Athenian youth and that he also did not believed in the Greek gods, so Socrates seventy years of age was put on trial. Near the king-archon’s court, Euthyphro was astonished to see Socrates at the court house. Now Socrates finds this very interesting because Euthyphro, a professional priest highly respected by “authorities” (those who wants to get rid of Socrates) is at the court house to prosecute his father for murder. Now for Socrates to have a clear knowledge of the definition of what Piety is? Which he could use to help defend himself, because prosecutors know and think highly of Euthyphro “an expert on ritual and on piety generally” (Plato, p 2) was for Euthyphro to explain why he was prosecuting his father for murder. Only then Socrates could equivalent between himself and Euthyphro; who citizens’ highly respect, bringing him respect, and freedom. Now Socrates wants Euthyphro to elucidate to him the meaning of piety since Euthyphro considered himself an authority over the subject. This is where Socrates begins his dialogue with Euthyphro seeking the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Euthyphro is a priest, a specialist in religious matters and claiming his highly science. His official role in the city is to examine the merits of the charges as those against Socrates. For a long time it was considered that this soothsayer embodied religious orthodoxy, popular traditional religious beliefs and Plato wanted to show that such a representative was unable to define piety, and thus prevent that Socrates was condemned for impiety. Socrates victim zealots of traditional religion. This thesis has been criticized in the early 20th century and has emerged a very different interpretation that reigned supreme for seventy years: Euthyphro would rather eccentric, fanatic distinguishing clearly the average religiosity of its citizens ...…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the reading Euthyphro, Plato’s end goal is to show that there is no rational relationship between “the pious” and “to be loved by the Gods.” The point of Socrates argument is that he is ultimately asking Euthyphro to explain piety by questioning the characteristics of something that is loved. Is something loved because it is good, is it loved because it is popular, what makes something loved?…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates and Euthyphro unexpectedly run into each other outside of the Athens courthouse. Euthyphro went to the courthouse to prosecute his father for killing one of his servants, who was a murderer. Socrates was summoned to court to be charged with disturbing the youth. After Euthyphro stated his business at the courthouse, Socrates assumes that he must be a religious expert if he is willing to prosecute his own father on such a serious charge. Euthyphro then agrees with Socrates that he does indeed know all there is to know about what is holy. Socrates asks Euthyphro to teach him what holiness is, in hope that it will help with his trial.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    that goes by Meletos, who had plans of indicting the philosopher following the claim that he’d been corrupting the youth.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout their conversation with one another, Socrates sets up Euthyphro to contradict himself to prove that he is not as much of an expert as he thinks he is on religious matters. Where Socrates trips up Euthyphro is on his definition of piety. The original concept Euthyphro claimed was that something is pious if it is loved by the gods, and it is pious based off of that alone. Socrates continues to pose questions to Euthyphro on this idea, as it is a very vague definition that does not give very much insight into what piety exactly is. Eventually, Socrates asks if something pious is loved by the gods because it is in fact pious, or is it pious solely because it is loved by the gods? This is where this concept begins to unravel. Euthyphro…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Euthyphro- Plato

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the writing called Euthyphro by Plato, Socrates is being charged with corrupting the youth and not believing in all of the Gods. He is being accused of this by a man named Meletus who feels as though he is guilty of not believing in the Gods of the states. Not only does he not believe in the Gods but he is accused of making up new ones. The crimes that he is being charged with go hand in hand with each other but he maintains his innocence because he feels he isn’t guilty. While on the other hand Euthyphro is prosecuting his father and indicting him for murder. Morally Euthyphro feels as though it’s the right thing to do and his family doesn’t agree only because it’s his father. In this essay I will summarize the dialogue and its message relating to piety/holiness.…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In an analysis of Plato’s Euthyphro, Peter Geach claims that Socrates commits the Socratic fallacy when he refuses Euthyphro’s first definition of piety. Socrates rejects the definition given because it does not give a formal definition of what piety is, but instead offers examples of things and actions that are pious. Geach believes that this is a substantial fallacy committed by Socrates, one that may prevent him from getting at the truth of the matter. I will first expand on Geach’s Socratic fallacy, as well as explain why this fallacy presents itself as a problem for Geach. Then I will examine Euthyphro to see if Geach is correct in assuming that Socrates commits the Socratic fallacy. In addition to Euthyphro, I will look at another one…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Take the current society into consideration; the world has always taken part in unethical actions but lately riots, shootings, increase in addictions specifically focusing on alcohol and drugs. All of these acts are clearly not exactly what a person would consider ethical or an act representing piety. It is impossible to see a god approving the act of killing an innocent bystander if anything, the gods would consider this society to be following acts showcasing the definition of impiety. With this society having so much negativity present within it, it may appear to be a challenge to focus on living a positive life or completing acts of piety, which can cause a person to struggle with living an ethical life. It is possible that due to the time period this was written it is considered more of an issue that Euthyphro is prosecuting against his father due to the fact they are family but in this society it is easy to see that some people are less family oriented and if a person prosecuted against their father today, which happens quite often due to the frequent impious acts in the world today that the action wouldn’t even be as much of a shock to someone like it was to Socrates. Also, if a person values their religion for example, then they may still focus on the second definition of what piety is considered to be “Piety is dear to the gods and…

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Euthyphro Vs Plato

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Socrates’s initial intension was to tap from the repertoire of the assumed and over – estimated knowledge of Euthyphro, as part of his defense. The dialogue between Socrates and Euthyphro was based on the role of the deities and justice in the man’s actions as Euthyphro presented himself as man of great religious knowledge. Euthyphro, also referred to as learned, soothsayer and diviner, postulated his belief that the relationship between man and the deities was more of a commercial beneficial relationship.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Euthyphro is a dialogue between Socrates and a traveling cleric. The two men meet at court, where the cleric, Euthyphro, claims to have a clear definition of piety. Socrates exclaims that he wishes to know the definition of piety so that he may better defend himself in his upcoming trial. Euthyphro agrees to teach Socrates, and so they begin to discuss. Early on, Socrates makes clear his desire for a universal truth, or a definition of piety that will be true in every case. Euthyphro makes several attempts to define piety in a way that satisfies Socrates.…

    • 1979 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The conversation between Socrates and Euthyphro takes place at the marketplace. Euthyphro is on his way to charge his father for murder, and Socrates is going to his own trial, because he was accused of corrupting the minds of the youth. Before going into his trial, Socrates asks Euthyphro, who claims to be a spiritually enlightened prophet, what exactly makes something of piety or impiety. He asks this, because he wants to be seen as Euthyphro’s student, and so that he can use Euthyphro’s teachings in order to understand the difference between godliness and ungodliness, so that he can represent himself in court. As Euthyphro attempts to define it in clear and general terms, Socrates brings up different flaws and perspectives on his explanations that cause him to delve into it. As they continue to discuss it, Socrates’ questions cause Euthyphro to come full circle back to his first explanation of it, and they never come to a clear conclusion.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the Euthyphro, he gives about 4 different definitions to what he thinks piety is. The first definition Euthyphro gives is that being pious is what he is currently doing, prosecuting the wrongdoer, not to prosecute them would be impious. However, Socrates was unsatisfied with this definition. It was an example rather than a definition. Socrates needed an answer with some form that is consistent with Euthyphro’s definition that all pious actions pious, and impious actions impious.…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    For these two articles that we read in Crito and Apology by Plato, we could know Socrates is an enduring person with imagination, because he presents us with a mass of contradictions: Most eloquent men, yet he never wrote a word; ugliest yet most profoundly attractive; ignorant yet wise; wrongfully convicted, yet unwilling to avoid his unjust execution. Behind these conundrums is a contradiction less often explored: Socrates is at once the most Athenian, most local, citizenly, and patriotic of philosophers; and yet the most self-regarding of Athenians. Exploring that contradiction, between ¡§Socrates the loyal Athenian citizen¡¨ and ¡§Socrates the philosophical critic of Athenian society,¡¨ will help to position Plato¡¦s Socrates in an Athenian legal and historical context; it allows us to reunite Socrates the literary character and Athens the democratic city that tried and executed him. Moreover, those help us to understand Plato¡¦s presentation of the strange legal and ethical drama.…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Socrate's Conviction

    • 1666 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Why, in a society relishing freedom and democracy, would a seventy-year-old philosopher be executed for what he was teaching? What could Socrates have done to prompt a jury of 500 Athenians send him to his death just a few years before he would have died naturally? He was charged with not believing in the gods worshipped by the city, introducing new divinities and for corrupting the youth. Socrates was a freethinker who went around Athens probing his fellow Athenians with questions and dialectal interrogations about religion and politics. He held contemporary views, that when he expressed them, provoked his listeners to anger. In 423 B.C., Socrates produced a play called Clouds, which at the time proved to be no threat to Athenian values and democracy. Characters in the play were taught how strengthen weak arguments by learning rhetorical skills and trickery and innovative divinities were introduced. However in 399 B.C., Socrates was charged with impiety. This was not the only charge brought against this philosopher; he was also accused for corrupting adolescences, Alcibiades and Critias. Should he have been condemned to death over such charges? Although religion and the state were central to ancient Athenian law, Socrates was executed unjustly.…

    • 1666 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the Euthyphro dialogue, Socrates poses the question: “And is then all that is just pious? Or is all that is pious just, but not all that is just pious, but some of it is and some is not?” (11e-12a). Socrates answers this question by claiming piety is a subset of justice: “This is the kind of thing I was asking before, whether where there is piety there is also justice, but where there is not always piety, for the pious is part of justice” (12d). This can be understood as that if there is piety, there is justice, but if there is justice, there is not necessarily piety. Justice, then, is a category that contains piety. Moreover, justice is a dichotomous category containing two types of justice: piety, as mentioned, and care of men, or good will towards men. Piety, then, is “care of the gods, while that concerned with the care of men is the remaining part of justice” (12e). Caring for other men entails that one must do what is for “the good and the benefit of the object cared for” (13b). This further entails that one should not harm others since harm is not for the good or benefit of fellow men. In fact, for Socrates, doing harm is identical to doing wrong, which is clear when he states that “doing people harm is no different from wrongdoing” (49c). Furthermore, since all doing of harm is wrong, even vengeance is wrong because vengeance is doing wrong in return for wrong received. This consequentialist ethic required Socrates to refuse to attempt an escape from his impending execution despite his friend’s suggestion since to break the Athenian law and sentence which Socrates agreed to would be harming the state and paying vengeance (see…

    • 2410 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics