Preview

Socrates Worldview

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1830 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Socrates Worldview
Socrates Worldview
Origin
This question focuses on why there is something rather than nothing. Socrates uses the theory of recollection as evidence to prove his theory of creation. This theory of creation introduces that our souls have an existence before this earthly life. Socrates believes that, “…the living have come from the dead no less than the dead from the living” (72a Phaedo). He then takes the previous statement and concludes, “…that if this was so, it was a sufficient proof that the souls of the dead must exist in some place from which they are reborn” (72a Phaedo). Socrates believes that souls are in preexistence and that each individual receives theirs shortly after birth.

Condition The question of condition focuses on what is wrong with humanity. Information from the readings reveals that ignorance is the basic problem and that people are ignorant of their own ignorance. In the apology, Socrates suggests “that the difficulty is not so much to escape death; the real difficulty is to escape from wickedness…” (39a Apology). In other words, humans have a natural propensity towards evil or injustice and Socrates points it out. Socrates goes on by saying how viciousness will hit a person quicker than death. He describes himself, an old man, to be hit by the slower of the two and the younger accusers to be hit with the faster.
Socrates later states in the Phaedo, “So long as we keep to the body and our soul is contaminated with this imperfection, there is no chance of our ever attaining satisfactorily to our object, which we assert to be Truth” (66b Phaedo). This is a condition of bodily detachment between our body and our soul. Socrates believes that when the soul is not pure, we will not be able to reach the truth. The soul may not be pure because of the body. Socrates claims that the body fills us with desires, fears, and loves. These distract and interrupt us from getting to the truth. The body is also to blame for our

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Plato’s Phaedo, socrates tells us his theories of the soul before and after death. He shows us that the body and soul are separate and the soul stays after death and lives before being born.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates’ passage is formulated by the knowledge that the soul consists of three parts that are predisposed by our own desires. He is fundamentally attempting to disprove the notion that the soul is one.…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato’s “Phaedo” is a dialogue between Socrates and his friends, Cebes and Simmias. These two men have asked Socrates to prove to them that the soul survives after death due to its immortality. Socrates gives them several arguments, which ultimately lead to his conclusion that proves the soul’s immortality and furthermore its perishability. Socrates proves that soul lives despite the body’s death by showing that if an entity has a certain characteristic, it will not accept the characteristic that is the opposite to its own. Socrates believes that the soul and the body are two entirely different things; the body is created to disappear after death and the soul is created to exist forever after death.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Socrates who was he? “Socrates was a Greek philosopher. Socrates was born c. 470/469 B.C., in Athens”. (Wiki) In Phaedo, I understand that Socrates he has arguments that demonstrate that the soul is immortal. “If we live on after bodily death, there is no reason to fear it.” (Phaedo) However, these ideas are attributed to Socrates in Phaedo. Of course we have no way of knowing if he feared death or not. He appeared not to fear death but who knows. You hear people say all the time, "I have no fear of death"--I've even thought that to myself-- but there's no way they or myself can know that until the last few minutes of life. I think that virtually everyone will fear death at…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates Quote Analysis

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This quote is significant because it exemplifies the way Socrates uses HIS method. Socrates uses metaphors in order to humbly enlighten his audience. At times Socrates structure of explanation is perceived to be complex and or difficult to interpret. To simplify what he is attempting to get across usually takes a thorough examination. Socrates is from ancient times and his methodology still suits fit to modern day. Analyzing the context of his circumstances before death alone goes to show the depth of understanding one needs to comprehend his ideology and beliefs. This quote also provides us with the notion of not being selfish and to avoid pretentious. When one thinks about death or the chance of dying when they’re in a predicament because…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this essay I am evaluating if Socrates death harmed the citizens of Athens more then it did Socrates himself. Socrates has two reasons why Athens will be more harmed then him by his death. When Socrates died he did just that, he left the earth and was no longer there, after this moment Socrates was no longer harmed by his own death, the people of Athens however went on to suffer the repercussions for years to come. It was Athens in the end that suffered, Socrates was at peace.…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Plato’s Apology: A Defense of Socrates was assumed to serve as Socrates’ trial for his being a fink and shady practices with the youth. Socrates safeguarded himself in a way that he was solely operating assistance to the god that claimed that he was more knowledgeable than everyone else. This defiance didn’t function, and he didn’t win the trial. Socrates continued defending during the ruling allocation of the trial, which lead to him being condemned to death, and aforesaid he was compelled to display his state or condition of being subject to death. Socrates looked at death as not being a dreadful. The information in this paper will clarify how Socrates developed that theory and display why this development is not true.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order for this to be, Socrates must go into depth about the soul, because that is where we are affected by madness and find our happiness. This is the connecting link that leads one explanation of love as madness to a discussion of the soul. The main idea focuses on the soul being the driving force that leads a person here on earth and in the afterlife. It is always in motion and as a self-mover has no beginning, it cannot be destroyed. According to Socrates, the soul is immortal, divine, and infinite. It is the soul that presides over all aspects of life. The proof is in Socrates' own definition of the soul that goes beyond all living and non-living things in both the human life and the afterlife. I believe that Socrates uses very direct, obvious dialogue about the nature of the soul to be as perfectly clear as possible about the main idea of the text. The soul is something that is unbreakable, immortal, and generates all human action. Socrates outlines how the soul is the basis for all that he speaks about; the essential lesson which all his speeches are based…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The most intriguing people you will encounter in this life are the people who had insights about you, that you didn't know about yourself” (Alder). This quote can be used to show why the great Greek philosopher, Socrates is deemed as being so intriguing. During his time, Socrates was seen as a great threat because he tended to break free from the normal way of thinking and inevitably, people became afraid of him. Socrates was eventually put to death on account of “corrupting the youth” and being an “atheist,” which were false claims against him to cover up the fact that his accusers simply didn’t like him or his ways. When reading Plato’s Republic, Socrates is shown as being very intriguing because of: his humble ways, his Socratic method,…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Gorgias1, Socrates says, “I think that I am the only or almost the only Athenian living who practices the true art of politics; I am the only politician of my time”, while in the Apology2, he claims that “he who will really fight for the right, if he would live even for a little while, must have a private station and not a public one.” As we know, Socrates did manage to live for over 70 years, and did indeed confine himself to a private stance; but how can one be a politician without being a public figure? Or was Socrates not a true champion of justice, as he maintained to be?…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates

    • 839 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Question 2) In Book I of Republic, Thrasymachos’s states that unjust people are stronger and more powerful than just people. Thrasymachos believes that being just is not virtuous nor wise but that men act just only because they afraid of having injustices happening to them so they obey. Those who have power and control are those people who act unjust-they make laws and rules that benefit themselves, not the rest of the people. Socrates proves Thrasymachos otherwise by arguing that being just is virtuous, wise and profitable and being unjust does not make people stronger nor more powerful. Those in power or rulers make laws that are just for themselves but Thrasymachos agrees that sometimes rulers make mistakes and make laws that are unjust to them, therefore, making them just or advantageous for the people they rule. Therefore, unjust people would not be more powerful in this case. Additionally, Socrates goes on to reason with Thrasymachos that the individual in power commands advantages for his or her subject rather than their own personal advantage. Socrates makes a comparison to a doctor and a patient as well as a pilot and a sailor, where the doctor and pilot are commanding advantages for their subjects, the patient and sailor respectively. Thrasymachos argues that a just man will pay taxes on his estate and an unjust man will pay less taxes on the same size property, etc. Therefore, being unjust serves a greater purpose than being just. Socrates goes on to argue that no one chooses willingly to rule but they do so in exchange for wages because the ruler does not expect to make other gains in simply doing what is advantageous for the people being ruled. Work performed by people in power and in control is considered an art form that without being rewarded with wages solely serves that subject, or weaker person, receiving the benefit of the art. For example, a doctor practices the art of making others healthy. There are no advantages the doctor gains in…

    • 839 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates Argument

    • 1294 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In response I would argue that Socrates might have the citizens best interest in mind by staying imprisoned. By acknowledging that understand that Rosa Parks did not know for sure that her action would change the injustice. But if the Socrates assumption in 50c was correct that one must take encounter that Rosa Parks could have caused her fellow citizens hurt, by causing the bus system to falter, and have to deal with the consequence along with her peers. The citizens, nor her soul were harmed in my example. Citizens were not harmed by Parks disobedience to the law, but they actually benefitted. Her soul was not harm because she knew it was time to put an end to the unjust system. It seems to me that Socrates argue that his escape will destroy the laws, and therefore harm the citizens, and soul is a huge exaggeration. Socrates could not predict the effect of his escape acted more on the fear of his action. He did not want to harm the citizens and him a soul. Socrates could have be the first person to stand up for his unjust sentence. Even though he didn’t believe it was unjust, because he would be harming his citizens, but my example shows that no harm would come from breaking the law. Socrates agreement suggests that he can predict the consequence of his actions. If Rosa Parks never to a leap of faith, then she would have been just another African- American going along with the injustice. Socrates is causing for harm by allowing citizens to have an unjust government system where people are sentenced to die being falsely accused. People would argue that citizens were beat, but consider the neglects of authorities. Blacks citizens were being degraded, and were not being treated as human being. The city that was suppose to give to them was suppose to give to them, was taking away their natural born…

    • 1294 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The conversation between Socrates and Alcibiades continues with them talking about how the soul is separate from the body. There is nothing that has more authority than the soul within the body. Socrates then states that people who know their parts of the body know what belongs the them, but not themselves. This means that their body parts are for their bodies, but they body parts do not belong to the soul. Again. Socrates brings up that people who tend to their bodies tend to what belongs to them rather than what belongs to themselves. This helps Socrates bring up the point that the person who loves the body is someone who who loved something that belonged to the body, but Socrates is the one who loves Alcibiades’ soul and not his body. Love is loving another person’s soul as long as they are making progress. The person who loves Alcibiades soul will not leave him unlike the people who love the body. Socrates will love him unless he became corrupt and ugly. The body changes and the soul continues to grow. Socrates points out that he is…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Socrates Views On Akrasia

    • 1532 Words
    • 7 Pages

    No One Does Wrong Willingly The problem of akrasia is a critical theoretical issue in the history of western philosophy, contemporary western philosophy, and moral philosophy. This problem was first raised by Socrates. The Greek word for the weakness of will or incontinence is akrasia, generally refers to that acts which violate the best choices of human beings. Besides, the problem of akrasia means that is it possible for people to do actions which violate their best choices?…

    • 1532 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Human nature is a person’s way of thinking, feeling and acting. Socrates said that human nature was not affected by one’s wealth or one’s victories. He claimed that it was all based on what we were truly searching for, whether it was for the truth, our happiness, or our souls. The Sophists only believed in winning and learning ways to better enable their students to fight and win. Socrates was different in the aspect that he didn’t care about winning, he didn’t care whose argument was better. He only cared of the opinions that were getting tossed around. For example, if I was to have a conversation with Socrates today about a popular TV show, he would most likely persuade me to spend my time in a more productive and benefiting activity. If…

    • 201 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics