Preview

Socrates Suspicion Of Democracy Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
500 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Socrates Suspicion Of Democracy Analysis
This essay will contend that the source of Socrates’ suspicion of democracy derives from the process by which the dissemination of knowledge or the lack of knowledge to the public is conducted. Secondly, it will evaluate one strength and weakness in Socrates’ method at arriving at truth and therefore the best way to govern.

The source of Socrates’ suspicion of democracy stems from the argument that by virtue of the law being established through majority rule the best orators can persuade the majority, over experts, through the use of rhetoric, which is void from knowledge and therefore void from the truth. Socrates stresses that the general public is more likely to be convinced through pandering from the most skilled rhetoricians who pander rather than by expert testimony that is based on reason and logic. Socrates states this assertion in his dialogue with Gorgias (459b) and argues that because the
…show more content…
Socrates states, “my method is to call in support of my statements the evidence of a single witness, the man I am arguing with…the rest of the world are nothing to me” (474a). Socrates is unable to succeed in finding this greater truth in his dialogue with Calicles, and is left to answer his own questions and to engage in a long rhetorical speech. Socrates’ position is weakened because he engaged in what he initially told Gorgias at the beginning of their dialogue “to put off to another occasion the kind of long continuous discourse and [a willingness] to give a brief answer to what is asked” (449c). Socrates may have been successful in using his method up until his conversation with Calicles, but as it shows, the quest for reason and logic can only progress if both parties are willing and in Calicle’s case he was not. Therefore Socrates method or argumentation is as unsuccessful at arriving to the truth as he claims democracy to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    In the "Crito" Socrates states, "Why should we care so much for what the majority think?" (Plato 45) Socrates believes that we should not care what the majority thinks because those who are reasonable people will understand. However, Crito's counter-argument to this is that the majority can cause great harm; therefore we should care what they think. Socrates further goes on to say the majority acts haphazardly; therefore, they cannot do great good or great harm (Plato 45). Crito says that "the opinion of the many" would judge us wrong if we didn't help you (and anyone in your position would agree that you ought to escape). Socrates notes that some opinion is right and some opinion is wrong. It is not simply a matter of mere opinion, but of correct opinion. The authority in this case is the actual truth of the matter. Socrates introduces a distinction between true opinion and false opinion. And the path to the latter is through argument and reason. By appealing to the opinion of "the many," Crito seems to be committing the Ad Populum Fallacy (i.e., something is right, true, etc., because the majority of the population says it is). Socrates seems to pose an open argument: the opinion of the many says that escaping from jail is right – but is it right? Socrates seems to believe that although the majority believes it is right for him to escape from jail he is going against what he believes to be true. Socrates believes that he has a tacit consent with the state by living in Athens for…

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Democracy provides the most just and efficient form of political rule” Asses whether Plato has shown his claim to be false.…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 507 B.C. an Athenian leader named Clisthenes introduced political reforms that introduced democracy. Democracy means “rule by the people,” and the citizens vote to decide the rules of their country. The Greeks, especially the Athenians who founded democracy, provided citizenship, public education, and most importantly, freedom of speech. In order for there to be democracy, the citizens must feel safe in expressing their views and in criticizing the government. Even though democracy disappeared from history after the fall of Athens until the 1700s in America, its concept still hasn’t changed from time and it became Greece’s most enduring contributions to the world.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The source of Socrates’ suspicion of the democracy stems from the argument that the general public is ignorant and therefore lacks the knowledge or truth to make the best decision for government. The foundation of democracy is based on majority rule, however because the majority is unaware of what truly is good for them, by virtue of their ignorance, the masses are not capable of electing a leader fit to run the state or government. Socrates contends that due to mass ignorance, the majority will vote in favor of what is more pursuable rather than what is logical (459b). Therefore, the consequence of democracy is inherent corruption in the governing structure due to ignorance.…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates’ charge against democracy was based on his fundamental belief that people are not equal. His idea of the perfect city is described as a three tiered system of rulers, guardians, and artisans; all whom know their place inside and outside of politics. The rulers create the constitution, and everyone else is expected to live by it. Discordantly, democracy is based on the ideas of equality, individuality, tolerance, and freedom.…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato and Immigration

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages

    If Plato were alive today, he would be probably be disappointed with how society has turned out, but not surprised. Our democratic government is something Plato has seen in his lifetime and is not fond of it. He has seen the unstable manner of democracy, and knows that it lacks leaders with proper skills and morals. Leaders, according to Plato, must be groomed from birth. They must be molded and shaped from young children through intense training and education to become “expert” rulers. In essence, they must “know” the “forms of good.” It is only these individuals who have reached this prestigious level of expertise that would be qualified to make judgment and decisions.…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this essay, I explicate connections between Socrates’ descriptions of himself and his role as a citizen and educator in his home city, Athens, as portrayed in Plato’s Apology. The Apology depicts the trial of Socrates, and its entirety is narrated from the point of view of Socrates. Therefore, in the account of this trial, we have a lens through which we can view Socrates’ ideologies and convictions. Additionally, because Socrates is speaking directly to a jury of five hundred and one Athenians, from this dialogue we can interpret how Socrates saw his life and purpose in relation to Athens and her people through his direct interaction with them.…

    • 1593 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates’ claim must be elucidated, but first, Socrates’ definition of a democracy…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Athenian Democracy

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Democracy => The people rule themselves. It was easy for the Athenians to see who the people are due to the population number at the time. Therefore, they could easily make decisions.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates also believed that dialogue was superior to rhetoric for the view that rhetoric was just an art at best; an illusion for public display. For Gorgias, who maintained a sophist lifestyle, rhetoric was his weapon in persuasion; it entitled him to ‘power’. Furthermore, Gorgias believed that rhetoric’s main use was to influence rather than synergize the masses. For example, whether or not one knew of the specific subject of discussion, Gorgias, would speak of what the people wanted to hear and…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Democracy is a government where people control what happens. An example of an excellent democracy could be The United States of America. Anybody over the age of eighteen can vote, if you take a test you can become a citizen, and everybody is considered equal. Ancient Athens had a very interesting version of democracy in the early 300 B.C. to the mid 400 B.C. eras. Athens had a tyrant that controlled the city, the citizens who voted for laws to keep the government calm and peaceful. Ancient Athens’ democracy is not the best version of democracy in the world. Many people actually believe that Ancient Athens’ was not even democratic at all because less than half of the population could not vote and their idea of being…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ancient Greek civilizations was innovative in virtually every aspect of their society, transforming and influencing the rest of the world with structurally advanced architecture, sophisticated philosophies, and the world first democratic political assembly. Though speculation occurs about the true nature of innovative thinking in the ancient Greek world, the new ideas that developed there were among the most influential in human history. Ancient Greece had a democracy, which is a type of government where every citizen has a say in important decision-making. For example, the Funeral Oration of Pericles states, “Our constitution is called a democracy because the power is in the hands not of minority but of the whole people.” Democracy…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The birth of democracy in Sparta and Athens was a long, painful journey, created by wars, cruel leaders, and heroic figures. Although many of democracy’s ideas came from Athenian government, it was very different from the democracy in the United States, for example. In general, wealthy aristocrats had the most power. But without the ideas that this time period created, who knows where we would be now. In this paper, I’m going to outline how democracy came to be in early Athenian and Spartan governments, the structure of said governments, and compare the two city-states.…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While democracy in ancient Greece may not have survived in it’s original, non-representative state, it has still left a lasting impact on modern day democratic society. Athens was the birthplace of democracy, being the first place to adopt it as it’s political system.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato has an aversion to democracy because it violates the proper order of society by creating an artificial equality. His basic criticism is that democracy is an irrational form of constitution. It is based on the assumption that every citizen is equally entitled to a say in political affairs, no matter how unsuited he is in terms of ability, character or training. In this form of democracy, it doesn’t matter how ignorant a person is, he could still play a significant role in public affairs if he speaks persuasively enough. Plato was disgusted by the idea of a system where value and merit are disregarded and instead unconditional equality. He and Socrates both felt that all people were born with knowledge, but that not all people were in touch with the knowledge they possessed. Plato rejected the idea that all men are equals. Plato also believed that man was not self-sufficient; he believed man would be most happy living in a state, being ruled over. It seems that he also believed all men wanted to live the truly good life where they could be in tune with the truth and achieve their ultimate goals. When discussing a democratic society and its leaders, Plato says, “When a democracy which is thirsting for freedom has evil cupbearers presiding over the feast, and has drunk too deeply the strong wine of freedom, then, unless her rulers are very amenable and give a plentiful draught, she calls them to account and punishes them, and says…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays