Preview

Socrates and Descartes

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
920 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Socrates and Descartes
To say that a man is defined by what he does in his life is an understatement when you think of two of the greatest philosophers ever. Each man was very respected while they were living but when you have hundreds or thousands of people still talking about you after your death there is something very special to say about that. Socrates and Rene Descartes spent their life looking for the truth. They looked for the perfect answer to every question because both of them wanted the answers no one could have an answer too. Although these men were alive at very different times, they had the same ideas about life. Socrates spent his life looking for the truth. He was looked at as being a crazy old man, but that was something he was far from. Socrates looked for a certain answer he would know to be true. Anyone can question everything but Socrates did it in such a way that you wanted to answer his questions in order to prove yourself right. When answering his questions however, people would end up changing their minds and from what they originally thought too not having any idea what they thought. Socrates didn't do this though to confuse the person he was having a conversation with, but he was just trying to find the truth about the world. Rene Descartes didn't ask other people the questions he wanted the answers too. He asked himself. Descartes only wanted the truth so he had to forget everything he ever learned and start all over asking himself the questions that Socrates would ask of other people. Although Descartes wanted to know everything that was true, the way he figured these things out are still being questioned today. "I think, therefore I am" is that start that Rene Descartes needed to start proving everything he wanted to be true. Descartes was influenced by the precision and completeness of mathematics. Euclid, was the man that influenced him the most, because of his axioms and the thought that you must start all with things that you know
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Rene Descartes: The Father Of Modern Philosophy
    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Rene Descartes: The Father Of Modern Philosophy

    Rene Descartes lived from 1596 to 1650. He was born in France, and went to a Jesuit primary school. He earned a law degree, but later on he began focusing on math and logic in the world. During the early 17th century, his ideas deviated more and more from previous philosophers. Because of this, he became known as “The Father of Modern Philosophy.” While some of his ideas weren’t completely original, his way of getting to them was. He believed in totally ignoring everything previous philosophers had done, and starting new, as if their work had never happened. He did not even trust his own emotions. He also believed that consciousness was the only truth in the world, leading to his most famous statement, “I think; therefore I am.” He also published several books, and despite his late entrance in the subject, and early death, he is still one of the most…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Socrates 'Midwife In Plato's Theaetetus'
    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Socrates 'Midwife In Plato's Theaetetus'

    Socrates does not in fact tell his associates anything, but rather helps them understand ideas that were already in them through his series of questions that test whether what his associate says is of truth or not, and so he is not actually giving any knowledge. In the Meno, he shows an example of what he does when he attempts to “bring forth” geometry knowledge from a Greek slave boy. The boy answers some questions incorrectly at first before stating that he does not know. Socrates then continues to ask the boy more questions, and as the boy answers them, he comes to understand it without Socrates ever actually telling the boy anything at all. Socrates then states that “Then he will have knowledge without being taught by anyone but only questioned, since he will have recovered the knowledge from inside himself” (Meno, 85c-85d). He is saying that the boy is able to gain knowledge from Socrates asking him multiple questions about it constantly, and it will come forth within his associates, without him actually telling them anything at all. He also elaborates on this type of wisdom that he has in the Apology, saying “I thought this man seemed wise to many people, and especially to himself, but wasn’t. Then I tried to show him that he thought himself wise, but wasn’t.” (Apology, 21c-21e). Here, Socrates is stating that he has no knowledge, but rather questions the ideas of his associates to help them become more wise. This also showcases the type of wisdom that he does possess, which is knowing that he does not know…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Justice In Plato's The Republic
    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Justice In Plato's The Republic

    He proves this through much thought and questioning, showing that it is only philosophers that truly love wisdom and are out to seek the truth and accept it. To demonstrate the difficulty of accepting the truth, Socrates tells the story of the cave, where men see only shadows in the dark and assume them to be the truth. When they actually see that the truth is different from what they are used to, they refuse to believe it at first, although they do later.…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Plato's Apology: The Last Days Of Socrates
    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Plato's Apology: The Last Days Of Socrates

    Socrates in essence, believes in god and is too wise for his own good. Throughout whole trial he spoke nothing but the truth however, because of the greed and jealousy of men they convicted him other wise simply because of their own intentions. Furthermore, searching for the truth couldn't be possible because of the reality of the situation: Socrates was considered the wisest man, people in an act of evil wanted to confront and destroy him and in essence, this couldn't be possible because in fact Socrates was the wisest man and was unknowing of it. This in reality represents the irony in the situation because Socrates doesn't consider himself to be the wisest man in Greece, but he is. In reality Socrates only escape from death was to lie and he didn't feel obliged to do so. In fact the truth was there the whole time and it was up to the people to pry through the illusion of this situation and understand what Socrates was saying. This represents the high cost of searching out the truth in this case, which was the causing of Socrates'…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Euthyphro Is God Then The Source Of What Is Wrong
    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Euthyphro Is God Then The Source Of What Is Wrong

    This would go on until the person that Socrates was talking to (such as Euthyphro) winds up in the same position, recognizing that they didn’t know all that they thought they knew, then walks out irritated. I think, this raise an interesting humanity question for us. We claim that we value the truth more than lies, yet at the same time we would found ourselves similarly irritated by people (like Socrates) who challenge our ideas and put us in a position where suddenly the idea that we have been defending, we can suddenly see it’s not a good position that we thought it was, yet typically we don’t welcome…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Socrates In Plato's Republic
    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Socrates In Plato's Republic

    “The most intriguing people you will encounter in this life are the people who had insights about you, that you didn't know about yourself” (Alder). This quote can be used to show why the great Greek philosopher, Socrates is deemed as being so intriguing. During his time, Socrates was seen as a great threat because he tended to break free from the normal way of thinking and inevitably, people became afraid of him. Socrates was eventually put to death on account of “corrupting the youth” and being an “atheist,” which were false claims against him to cover up the fact that his accusers simply didn’t like him or his ways. When reading Plato’s Republic, Socrates is shown as being very intriguing because of: his humble ways, his Socratic method,…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Gadflies Of Society Analysis
    • 1940 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Gadflies Of Society Analysis

    First, in Plato’s Euthyphro, we see the Socratic Method of questioning being applied in a discussion between Socrates and Euthyphro. Plato writes, “Socrates: … Is the pious being loved by the gods because it is pious, or is it pious because it is being loved by the gods? Euthyphro: I do not know what you mean, Socrates.” (Plato 11). This method of questioning and critical thinking is what Socrates applies to all the issues that he is faced with, which is why it’s referred to as the Socratic Method. This method does not only apply to words or ideas, it can be applied to anything to find the deeper reasoning behind every belief. The Socratic Method is one of the most important aspects of Socrates’ lifestyle that causes him to act as a gadfly to society. Second, Socrates’ strength in evaluating information was admitting his ignorance when it came to what he didn’t know, while others attempted to act as though they already knew the answer to the problem. In The Apology, Socrates writes, “… It is likely that neither of us knows anything worthwhile, but he thinks he knows something when he does not, whereas when I do not know , neither do I think I know” (Plato 25). The acceptance of his ignorance allows for him to seek the truth and find it for himself rather than accepting what others tell him. He…

    • 1940 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Socrates Unjust Analysis
    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Socrates Unjust Analysis

    Socrates, one of the greatest minds go Ancient Greece’s was no exception. As a sophist, Socrates was considered a teacher of the noble. Sophist of Greed taught young men ’arete’: excellence or virtue for a price. However, Socrates wasn’t a regular sophist, he never accepted any monetary reward for his ’teachings“ (b316,p813) and he never actually taught anything but rather trained minds to think. Socrates states at the trail that he doesn’t have any true knowledge and he believed that in order to have any true knowledge one must be able to produce a single, clear definition of a subject without any exclusions to the rule, something that he was never able believed that he couldn’t do.Rather than use he own opinions to teach his pupils what to think, Socrates used ”systematic questioning“ (b136p813) to help clear their own minds and reach their own conclusions just by thinking. A skill that they could carry forward, into their lives as Athenian citizens. With this in mind, it is nearly impossible for the Athenians government to find Socrates guilty of…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Socrates
    • 839 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Socrates

    Question 2) In Book I of Republic, Thrasymachos’s states that unjust people are stronger and more powerful than just people. Thrasymachos believes that being just is not virtuous nor wise but that men act just only because they afraid of having injustices happening to them so they obey. Those who have power and control are those people who act unjust-they make laws and rules that benefit themselves, not the rest of the people. Socrates proves Thrasymachos otherwise by arguing that being just is virtuous, wise and profitable and being unjust does not make people stronger nor more powerful. Those in power or rulers make laws that are just for themselves but Thrasymachos agrees that sometimes rulers make mistakes and make laws that are unjust to them, therefore, making them just or advantageous for the people they rule. Therefore, unjust people would not be more powerful in this case. Additionally, Socrates goes on to reason with Thrasymachos that the individual in power commands advantages for his or her subject rather than their own personal advantage. Socrates makes a comparison to a doctor and a patient as well as a pilot and a sailor, where the doctor and pilot are commanding advantages for their subjects, the patient and sailor respectively. Thrasymachos argues that a just man will pay taxes on his estate and an unjust man will pay less taxes on the same size property, etc. Therefore, being unjust serves a greater purpose than being just. Socrates goes on to argue that no one chooses willingly to rule but they do so in exchange for wages because the ruler does not expect to make other gains in simply doing what is advantageous for the people being ruled. Work performed by people in power and in control is considered an art form that without being rewarded with wages solely serves that subject, or weaker person, receiving the benefit of the art. For example, a doctor practices the art of making others healthy. There are no advantages the doctor gains in…

    • 839 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    socrates
    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages

    socrates

    himself, yet in reality he was not. So I then tried to show him that he thought…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Apology
    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Apology

    He claims that he will speak with honesty and directness, unlike his accusers. He also tells the jury that he is not familiar with the court. He explains that his behavior started from a prophecy by the oracle at Delphi which claimed that he was the wisest of all men. Socrates took this as a riddle. He himself knew that he had no wisdom “small or great”. However, he knew that gods can’t lie. Socrates concluded that he must be wiser than other men only in that he knows that he knows nothing. In order to spread his interpretation, Socrates explains that he considered it his duty to question supposed "wise" men and to expose their false wisdom as ignorance. These activities earned him admiration amongst the youth of Athens, but a lot hatred and anger from the people he embarrassed. Socrates claims that this hatred is why he is being put on trial.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Socrates A Tyrant
    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Socrates A Tyrant

    Although Socrates was considered an intelligent man and a great teacher, perhaps the greatest teacher of his time, Socrates did not consider himself wise in all matters. In fact after questioning a man who had a great reputation for being wise Socrates explained, “The fact is neither of us know anything beautiful and good, but he thinks he does know when he doesn’t, and I don’t know and don’t think I do; so I am wiser than he is by only this trifle, that what I do not know I don’t think I do” (Mitchell 31). By revealing that the prominent citizens of Athens—those in positions of respect and power—were not as wise as they claimed to be, by proving that they thought they knew something that set them apart from the common man, but in actuality they did not, Socrates acquired many enemies. Moreover, since Socrates’ favorite target was the intellectual elite he acquired many enemies with the power and political influence to silence…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Socrates
    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Socrates

    The Euthyphro dialogue is essentially a conversation between Socrates and Euthyphro each of who attempt to argue their point of justification about why they are in court or should not be there, which in turn a question develops about the gods and holiness.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Who Is Socrates
    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Who Is Socrates

    “He knows nothing, and thinks that he knows. I either know nor think that I know” (Pg. 31). Socrates was told by the god of Delphi that there was no man wiser. Socrates wondered what this meant so he set out to find the answer by going around to those who had the reputation of being very wise. He had come to the same conclusion for all of these men that all though they did know a great deal more that Socrates was ignorant to they all fell into the same mistake when they all thought that because they knew all kinds of things with great important it overshadowed their wisdom and blocked the potential for them to expand their knowledge. It was this investigation from Socrates that lead to him having a great number of enemies.…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    rene descartes
    • 755 Words
    • 2 Pages

    rene descartes

    Rene Descartes has been called the father of modern philosophy and is considered by many to be one of the most influential philosophers. Descartes refused to accept the views of those who came before him and in order to rid of all past opinions, he began doubting everything, especially material things. This way of questioning and skepticism enabled Descartes to make breakthroughs in philosophy. Rene Descartes tried to prove that there is something more to ones own existence, as he is a philosopher most interested in his own self. He tried to prove that God does exist and that this is the certainty for which he based all his knowledge and beliefs. Descartes introduced his method of radical doubt, a method of not accepting anything as true. Rene Descartes believed that there is no need to doubt every opinion, there is only the need to question the foundations of those before. The inevitable result of this doubt is to make it impossible for us to have any further doubts about what we discover to be true. Everything in the universe is able to be doubted, but there are things that you should not have to doubt. Nothing should be perceived as automatically true. My belief is that one must doubt everything that has been taught to us until we can confirm the legitimacy. Using this method of doubt can help to enable the mind in understanding what is real and what is not real. Though many of Descartes' philosophies cannot be proven, his method of doubt showed to be extremely successful in creating ideas.…

    • 755 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics