Sociology and Socialization

Topics: Sociology, Socialization, Developmental psychology Pages: 17 (6008 words) Published: October 22, 2011
Socialization
Socialization has had diverse meanings in the social sciences, partly because a number of disciplines claim it as a central process. In its most common and general usage, the term ‘‘socialization’’ refers to the process of interaction through which an individual (a novice) acquires the norms, values, beliefs, attitudes, and language characteristic of his or her group. In the course of acquiring these cultural elements, the individual self and personality are created and shaped. Socialization therefore addresses two important problems in social life: societal continuity from one generation to the next and human development. Different disciplines have emphasized different aspects of this process. Anthropologists tend to view socialization primarily as cultural transmission from one generation to the next, sometimes substituting the term ‘‘enculturation’’ for socialization (Herskovits 1948). Anthropological interest in socialization or enculturation coincided with the emergence of the ‘‘culture and personality’’ orientation of the late 1920s and 1930s, when the works of Mead (1928), Benedict (1934), and Malinowski (1927) focused on cultural practices affecting child rearing, value transmission, and personality development and helped shape the anthropological approach to socialization. Much of the work in the culture and personality field was influenced by psychoanalytic theory. Contemporary cultural anthropology is guided less by psychoanalytic theory and more by social constructionist theories (such as symbolic interactionism), which view socialization as a collective and interpretive process of reality construction involving the reproduction of culture. This orientation has been shaped largely by the work of Geertz (1973), whose influence is also evident in sociological work on socialization, such as that of Corsaro and Eder (1995). Psychologists are less likely to emphasize the transmission of culture and more likely to emphasize various aspects of individual development (Goslin 1969). There is considerable diversity within psychology in regard to the aspect of socialization studied. For developmental psychologists, particularly those influenced by Piaget (1926), socialization is largely a matter of cognitive development, which typically is viewed as a combination of social influence and maturation. For behavioural psychologists, socialization is synonymous with learning patterns of behaviour. For clinical psychologists and personality theorists, it is viewed as the establishment of character traits, usually within the context of early childhood experiences. The subfield of child development is most closely associated with the topic of socialization within psychology, where socialization is largely equated with child rearing (Clausen [1968] provides a historical overview of socialization in these disciplines). Political science has shown some interest in socialization, but in a limited sense. Its studies have not gone much beyond political socialization: the process by which political attitudes and orientations are formed. However, a different and more esoteric use of the term occasionally appears in this literature: socialization as ‘‘collectivization,’’ that is, the transformation of capitalism to socialism and/or communism.

Within sociology, there have been two main orientations toward socialization. One views socialization primarily as the learning of social roles. From this perspective, individuals become integrated members of society by learning and internalizing the relevant roles and statuses of the groups to which they belong (Brim 1966). This view has been present in some form from the beginnings of sociology as a discipline but has been most closely associated with structural functionalist perspectives. The other, more prevalent sociological orientation views socialization mainly as self-concept formation. The development of self and identity in the context of intimate and reciprocal relations...

References: ——— 1993 American Lives. New York: Free Press. Coleman, James S. 1961 The Adolescent Society. New York: Free Press.
Bem, Sandra L. 1974 ‘‘The Measurement of Psychological Androgyny.’’ Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 42:155–162.
Block, Jean H. 1983 ‘‘Differential Premises Arising from Differential Socialization of the Sexes: Some Conjectures.’’ Child Development 54:1335–1354.
Brim, Orville G., Jr. 1966 ‘‘Socialization through the Life Cycle.’’ In O. G. Brim, Jr., and S. Wheeler, eds., Socialization after Childhood: Two Essays. New York: Wiley.
Bronfenbrenner, Urie. 1970. Two Worlds of Childhood: U.S. and U.S.S.R. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Clausen, John A. 1968 ‘‘A Historical and Comparative View of Socialization Theory and Research.’’ In J. A.
Cooley, Charles H. 1902 (1964) Human Nature and the Social Order. New York: Scribner’s.
Elder, Glen H., Jr. 1974 Children of the Great Depression. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Erikson, Erik H. 1959 Identity and the Life Cycle. New York: International Universities Press.
Fine, Gary A. 1987 With the Boys: Little League Baseball and Preadolescent Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Foote, Nelson N. 1951. ‘‘Identification as the Basis for a Theory of Motivation.’’ American Sociological Review 16:14–21.
Galbraith, Robert C. 1982 ‘‘Sibling Spacing and Intellectual Development: A Closer Look at the Confluence Models.’’ Developmental Psychology 18:151–173.
Goslin, David A. 1969 Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Herskovits, Melville J. 1948 Man and His Works: The Science of Cultural Anthropology. New York: Knopf.
Hewitt, John P. 1998 The Myth of Self-Esteem. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Jones, R. A. 1977 Self-Fulfilling Prophecies: Social Psychological and Physiological Effects of Expectancies. New York: Wiley.
Kanter, Rosabeth M. 1977 Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books.
Levenson, Michael and Cheryl Crumpler. 1996 ‘‘The Models of Adult Development,’’ Human Development 39:135–149.
Levinson, Daniel J. 1978 The Seasons of a Man’s Life. New York: Knopf.
Lifton, Robert J. 1963 Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism: A Study of Brainwashing in China. New York: Norton.
Malinowski, Bronislaw 1927 (1953) Sex and Repression in Savage Society, London: Routledge.
McLanahan, Sara S. and G. Sandefur. 1994 Growing Up with a Single Parent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Mead, George H. 1934 Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Merton, Robert K. 1957 Social Theory and Social Structure. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.
Neisser, Ulric and David A. Jopling, eds. 1997 The Conceptual Self in Context. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Popenoe, David 1993 ‘‘American Family Decline, 1960– 1990: A Review and Appraisal.’’ Journal of Marriage and the Family 55:527–555.
Rheingold, Harriet L. 1969 ‘‘The Social and Socializing Infant.’’ In D. A. Goslin, ed., Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Steinmetz, Suzanne K. 1999 ‘‘Adolescence in Contemporary Families.’’ In M. B. Sussman, S. K. Steinmetz, and G. W. Peterson, eds., Handbook of Marriage and the Family, 2nd ed. New York: Plenum.
Zajonc, Robert B. 1976 ‘‘Family Configuration and Intelligence.’’ Science 192:227–236.
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Sociology and Socialization Research Paper
  • Sociology
  • Sociology Essay
  • Sociology Essay
  • sociology Essay
  • Sociology Essay
  • sociology Essay
  • Sociology Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free