Sociological Theory: Symbolic Interaction And Marriage

Symbolic Interaction and Marriage Marriage is a controversial topic in the world today, and for a variety of reasons. Young marriage, same-sex marriage, re-marriage, lack of marriage; there are a variety of hot topics surrounding the idea of marriage. According to the Oxford University Press dictionary, marriage can be defined as, “the formal union of a man and a woman, typically recognized by law, by which they become husband and wife”. Another definition, according to Sociology Guide.com, says that, “Marriage is one of the universal social institutions established to control and regulate the life of mankind…Its purposes, functions and forms may differ from society to society but it is present everywhere as an institution”. The idea of
One sociological theory that may help to explain the different values and understandings of marriage is symbolic interaction. Dolgon and Baker explain that, “the basic element of symbolic interactionism is the individual and his or her own construction of identity that takes place in small groups and organizations” (34). They also go on to say that larger institutions and structures also have importance because of the ways in which people continue to make them important. This basic understanding of symbolic interaction, when applied situationally, can lead to a further understanding of the conflicts and conversations around marriage in modern
There are many different ways that one can approach this topic. There are also numerous sociological perspectives that can help to explain why same-sex marriage has become more heard of, accepted, and even understood. Symbolic interactionism can lend several explanations for the different and evolving opinions surrounding this conversation. In her article, “Why Are People Changing Their Minds About Same-Sex Marriage,” Dr. Lisa Wade discusses some of the different reasons behind the shift in support for same-sex marriage. She says, “A third of respondents said that knowing a gay, lesbian, or bisexual person was influential in making them rethink their position on gay marriage” (Wade 2013). This finding directly associates with the social interactionist idea of the “definition of a situation” (Dolgon and Baker 34), as discussed previously. Based on the interaction with those whom may contribute different ideas and values about homosexuality and same-sex marriage, some individuals’ own beliefs are being