Preview

socio

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
15785 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
socio
PROTECTING CUISINE UNDER THE RUBRIC OF
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW:
SHOULD THE LAW PLAY A BIGGER ROLE IN THE KITCHEN?
Emily Cunningham ∗
Cite as 9 J. HIGH TECH. L. 21 (2009)
I. Introduction
In June 2007, Rebecca Charles, chef-owner of Pearl Oyster Bar (“Pearl”) in
New York City’s Greenwich Village, sued her former sous chef, Ed
McFarland, now chef and part owner of Ed’s Lobster Bar in New York’s SoHo neighborhood. 1 In her complaint, Charles alleged that McFarland had pirated
Pearl’s menu, recipes, dish presentations, décor, “look and feel,” all of which
Charles believed amounted to a flagrant misappropriation of both her and
Pearl’s intellectual property. 2 The detail that reportedly irritated Charles most was a dish on McFarland’s menu called “Ed’s Caesar.” 3 According to Charles,
McFarland had copied her own Caesar salad recipe, made with English muffin croutons and a coddled egg dressing, which Charles maintained was a signature dish at Pearl. 4
The culinary and restaurant industries billed Charles’s suit, which settled out of court on undisclosed terms in April 2008, 5 as among the first of its kind.6 In the past, chefs and restaurateurs had invoked intellectual property concepts to defend particular aspects of their restaurants, but most had stopped short of filing suits, and few had attempted to argue intellectual property theft in such totality. 7 While Charles maintained that her case was about protecting her restaurant as a whole and not about laying claim to a type of food, her lawsuit



J.D. candidate 2009, Suffolk University Law School.

1. See Complaint at 1:3, Powerful Katinka, Inc. v. McFarland, 2007 WL 2064059 (S.D.N.Y. 2007) (No.
07 CV 6036).
2. Id.
3. Pete Wells, Chef Sues Over Intellectual Property (the Menu), N.Y. TIMES, June 27, 2007, at A1.
4. Id.
5. Pete Wells, Chef’s Lawsuit Against a Former Assistant is Settled Out of Court, N.Y. TIMES, Apr. 19,
2008, at B2.
6. Eater.com, Pearl Oyster Bar v. Ed’s Lobster

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    business law

    • 343 Words
    • 1 Page

    Nancy Johnston, appellant, brought suit against her employer, Del mar Distributing Co., Inc., appellee, alleging that her employment had been wrongfully terminated. Del Mar filed a motion for summary judgment in the trial court alleging that appellant’s pleadings failed to state a cause of action. After a hearing on the motion, the trial agreed with Del Mar and granted its motion for summary judgment.…

    • 343 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Courtroom Obersvation

    • 2600 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The 2008 2L Moot Court Tournament at the Liberty University School of Law presented a case which was argued before the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, case number 82A04-8876-CV-285, Deborah White vs. Patrick Gibbs and Stand Alone Properties, L.L.C., d/b/a O’Malley’s Tavern.…

    • 2600 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Case Brief

    • 7225 Words
    • 24 Pages

    NOTICE: [***1] THESE ARE NOT OFFICIAL HEADNOTES OR SYLLABI AND ARE NEITHER APPROVED IN ADVANCE NOR ENDORSED BY THE COURT. PLEASE REVIEW THE CASE IN FULL.…

    • 7225 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Negligence and Points

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages

    5. According to the case, why didn't the court approve summary judgment for product liability claims? (5 points)…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Anne Anderson initially told one of Jan’s partners her story and put many calls into their office. However, she never a response from them! So Anne put a call into Jan Schlitchmann while he was on a radio show. Jan and his partners discussed the case and Jan agreed to go and meet with Anne and the family member’s of the children who died from Leukemia. So he went to the city of Woburn Wells. Jan saw the companies W.R. Grace and Beatrice Foods and thought it would be a goldmine for the law office to take on the case. Anderson told Jan that she and the other families were not looking for money in this lawsuit. The families only wanted an apology from the companies and for someone to clean up the area and make sure it would not ever happen again.…

    • 1370 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Frivolous Lawsuits

    • 2390 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Although this article was published in 1992, it provided me with an abundance of facts for the history of litigation and how it exploded into such a large industry…

    • 2390 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. The Court could not accept respondent’s contention that the plan of liquidation of Riggs-Young was informally adopted on December 27, 1967, or no later than April 1968, alludes to actions and statements made in connection therewith taken between December 1967 and June 1968.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hefter, L. and Litowitz, R. (1995). Protecting Intellectual Property. Retrieved October 9, 2008 from http://www.usinfo.org/trade/by9515.htm…

    • 1656 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brief 1

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Susan M. V. New York Law School, No. 129, Court of Appeals of New York, 76 N.Y. 2d 241; 556 N.E. 2d 1104; 557 N.Y.S. 2d 297; 1990 N.Y. LEXIS 1413, April 26 1990, Argued, June 14, 1990, Decided…

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Courtroom Observation Paper

    • 2729 Words
    • 11 Pages

    This case between the plaintiff, Deborah White (Appellee) and the defendants, Patrick Gibbs; and Stand Alone Properties, L.L.C., d/b/a O’Malley’s Tavern (Appenllants) was the subject of a Summary Judgment Motion filed on behalf of the Appellants in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, Hammond Division.…

    • 2729 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hot Coffee

    • 1875 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The lawsuit ended with Stella Liebeck’s injuries meriting an award of $200,000 compensatory damages; however that award was reduced proportionately to $160,000. The jury also awarded Ms. Liebeck $2.7 million in punitive damages, but because it was allegedly a fraudulent lawsuit, it was reduced by the trial court to $480,000 and stated that McDonald’s engaged in “willful, reckless, malicious, or wanton conduct”. Although this was a reasonable lawsuit, it was occurring when tort reform was gaining speed in the public eye, and was used in different means in the communities to help grow the idea of frivolous lawsuits.…

    • 1875 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The history of the case (Who won at trial court? Who won at the lower appellate level? Who won in this decision?)…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Civil Action Paper

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages

    For Jan Schlichtmann, Kevin Conway and Bill Crowley failing the complaint against Beatrice Foods and W.R. Grace was essentially the easiest part. When complaints cases are filed no matter the relevance or strength of the case the court required before proceeding. For example, at this point the grievance cases…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ciara harris

    • 592 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. Is this a civil or criminal case? What is the basis of your answer? (5 pt.)…

    • 592 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On September 2, 1997, Appellant filed a product liability action against both Friday's, who served the meal, and against Appellee Pro Source…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays