Preview

Social Inequality Case Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1577 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Social Inequality Case Study
BU224-01
November 23rd, 2010

HOMEWORK - UNIT 9
EXTERNALITIES & TAXES, SOCIAL INSURANCE, AND INCOME DISTRIBUTION
Chapter 19: Problems 1 and 5 on pages 472-474
Chapter 21: Problems 4 and 9 on pages 517-518

Chapter 19 / EXTERNALITIES /25
1.
a. Mrs. Chau plants lots of colorful flowers in her front yard.

What type of externality (positive or negative) is described? (2pts)
Positive externally.
Is the marginal social benefit of the activity greater than or equal to the marginal benefit to the individual? (1pt)

Mrs. Chau does not get as much satisfaction looking at the flowers as do people passing by, so the marginal social benefit is more for all of the people who enjoy them while the marginal benefit is less for Chau.
…show more content…
Consequently, without intervention, will there be too little or too much (relative to what would be socially optimal) of this activity? (1pt)

The benefit of the neighborhood or society has been fulfilled and maximized to the extent she can plant less flowers.

b. Anna Crombie and Fritz, a popular clothing store, opens in a mall, attracting more shoppers who also visit other stores.

What type of externality (positive or negative) is described? (2pts)

Positive externality.

Is the marginal social benefit of the activity greater than or equal to the marginal benefit to the individual? (1pt)
Other stores are reaping the rewards from their store just as they are.

Is the marginal social cost of the activity greater than or equal to the marginal cost to the individual? (1pt)

The marginal social benefit is greater then the marginal benefit for Anna and Fritz.

Consequently, without intervention, will there be too little or too much (relative to what would be socially optimal) of this activity? (1pt)

With no intervention the store may go out of business.

c. The fraternity next to your dorm plays loud music, keeping you from

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nt1330 Unit 3

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages

    For the optimal level of the activity in part c, the total benefit is $_________, the total cost is $_________, and the net benefit is…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A government monopoly is a monopoly based on ownership or control of a manufacturing method or process.…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ECO 204 Week 4 Quiz

    • 388 Words
    • 3 Pages

    occurs when taxed agents can alter their behavior and do something to avoid paying a tax…

    • 388 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    No Dogs Allowed

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages

    8. There are always gains and losses when a public good/service is exchanged. The possible externalities that may…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Quiz 15

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages

    B. the recognition that government intervention in markets sometimes enhances the economic welfare of the society…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    8. Assuming that what will benefit one person, will also benefit an entire society is an example of…

    • 3275 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    f) How much are the producer’s gains and the society loss (deadweight loss) as a result of the tariff?…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another thing to look at is the person’s intentions for their action and whether or not they have a better chance of producing greater happiness for everyone involved and not just look at the amount of happiness or misery that has a chance to be produced from such actions. When looking at the scenario of stealing food from ones neighbor they need to weigh the happiness or misery that would be produced from both stealing the food and not stealing it and from there determine which action is the best. Looking at the first action, stealing the food, we can say that the food would benefit the thief’s family in the way that they can survive longer. The neighbor however would be hurt by this action because that food could have been used to feed their family. If the neighbor however chose to not steal the food the opposite would occur. The neighbor would benefit because they would have more food for themselves and thus be healthier. The person who chose not to steal food would suffer and so would their family because they have nothing to eat and could potentially…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    qrqr

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages

    4. Suppose that the economy improves and the crime rate in West Philadelphia drops, so that the marginal…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arguments of Peter Singer

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Singer’s concept of marginal utility is that one should give as much as possible to the unfortunate; it should never create a hardship to the giver. This would be doing more harm than good. When a person contributes to the poor, it should not financially affect their lifestyle by putting them in debt, homeless, or without food.…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As its name demonstrates, it focuses on the distribution of welfare within the society and it aims at maximizing the welfare. In the real world, some governments primarily treat the welfare achievements as economic achievements. However, the word ‘welfare’ does not only mean the economic prosperity, but also happiness, health, and social well-being are included. In this way, the disagreements about which aspect inside the welfare approaches should we focus could be a latent problem. Besides, it is hard to value the compensation between the losses and benefits under the different subcategories of welfare. For example, if the government wants to implement a law which would extend the maximum working hours, then a lower level of happiness and health could be predictable, in other words, how could we integrate the very different aspects of welfare into one convincing standard? Yet difficulty not only rises from inside, this approach may be very against the virtue approach in some circumstances. If utilitarianism is adopted, where the gross happiness is the indicator of welfare, the information of who gains and who losses will still be missing. This is in huge contradiction with the notion that justice means the people get what they deserve, which is believed by…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Externality is very easy to explain. An externality is the measurement of the difference in what something costs for you and what it costs for society in economics.…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the other hand, institutional social welfare suggests that everyone in society merits support from the community…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The outcome of utilitarianism is to promote the “greatest happiness of the greatest number of persons”, so I feel that option B depicts this.…

    • 135 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    (iv) Introspection: The marginal utility analysis also assumes that from one’s own experience it is possible to draw inference about another person. This is self-observation applied to another person. It assumes that mind of human work identically in similar situations. This is how the system of taxation is built on the assumption that…

    • 333 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays