Preview

Social Disorganization Theory And Crime

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
681 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Social Disorganization Theory And Crime
Social disorganization theory directly links crime rates to neighbourhood environmental characteristics. The core principle of understanding this theory is knowing that location matters, and it is a substantial factor that will shape the likelihood of an individual involving themselves in illegal or deviant activities. (Lily et al. 2015) This theory suggests that youths from disadvantaged neighbourhoods participate in a subculture that approves delinquent behaviours. It validates how low levels of social control produced by the socio-economic status of the neighbourhood can influence individuals into misconduct and corruption. Burgess created a concentric zone theory that states most crime occurs in a specific zone because it is where immigrants …show more content…
It argues that “casual analysis should commence not with offenders and their environs but rather with the societal reaction that other people – including state officials – have towards offenders” (Lily et al. 2015) Once a person is labelled deviant, it is difficult to stray from that label once It has been demonstrated. In lecture, Maurutto stated that “what makes an act criminal is not the harm, but whether the state deems it to be criminal” (Maurutto 2017) It is the nature of society that determines if something is unfit, and that increases or declines over time since people are everchanging, and depends on the different types of society. Labels can be influenced by the individual characteristics such as gender, race, and their socio-economic status. Labelling theory examines that if one is to continue to place labels and treat wrongdoers as criminals, it will likely encourage that behaviour the state is trying to prevent, causing a negative reaction. Since these labels have such an intense factor to outsiders, the intensity only increases within the individual. They tend to believe their labels and feel as if they must live up to that name, that has now been attached to themselves. When labelling someone as a criminal in a society, it will lead citizens to make assumptions about offenders that may not be entirely accurate. (Lily et al. 2015) This shapes how society treats offenders and the result will only cause further criminal activity. (Maurutto 2017) There are many individuals that can deviate from society, but it is only if they are caught by authorities that they will deal with the backlash of having a label. If they commit a crime and do not get caught, then there is no label. However, if they do get caught, the individual will be labelled and eventually rejected from society which follows with being degraded and stigmatized from the social order. (Maurutto

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Some say labelling is not a ‘theory’ because it does not give an explanation of law, but questions why we have such rules. For Labelling theorists there is no such thing as crime, as we create the laws and punishments by defining certain acts to be deviant. Deviant means to depart from usual or accepted standards. Leading theorist Kitsuse said “it is the responses of the conventional and conforming members of society which identify and interpret behaviour as deviant which sociology transforms persons into deviants”. This means that it is not the actions themselves that are crimes…

    • 4485 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some sociologists believe that the initial cause of crime and deviance is attaching a definition or meaning to an individual or group of individuals, due to their ethnicity, social background, or gender. Many sociologists argue that no act is criminal in itself, however it only becomes criminal when others label it so. The labelling theory tends to look more at societies reaction to the act rather than the nature of the act. Lemert says that it is ‘pointless to seek the causes of primary deviance’- this suggesting that deviance is unlikely to have a single cause.…

    • 810 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For more than 20 years, the relationship between disorder and crime has been the focus of a contentious debate in social policy. In 1982, two academic theorist Wilson and Kelling came up with a metaphor known as the Broken Window theory that would link the relationship between disorder and crime within communities. They believe these two factors are causally linked and that policing would be the instrumental tool helping to prevent criminal activity. When officers were removed from their patrol cars and placed to walk the streets, some communities believed crime deceased making citizens feels a little more secure. Community policing has become a model of policing where it shift from traditional, reactive policing to one that promotes working…

    • 154 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Burgess’s model included five zones in which people lived according to competition. The “loop” consisted of commercial enterprises and locations best fit for transportation purposes. The second zone, however, was a particular cause for study, being because this zone included many immigrants and migrants who were too poor to stay farther away from the inner city. As a result, the majority amount of crime was seen to occur in this zone. The next three zones included the zone of working men’s homes, then the residential zone, and finally the commuter’s zone. Shaw and McKay concluded that the rate of crime decreased significantly as a person moved outward towards the commuter’s zone. It was believed that the more affluent families lived in this zone and thus, did not experience near as much crime. This observation led Shaw and McKay to conclude that, “…It was the nature of the neighborhood—not the nature of individuals within the neighborhood—that regulated involvement in crime” (Lilly, Cullen, & Bell,…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Central to social disorganization theory are the neighborhood mechanisms that reduce crime and disorder. Foremost among these are residents’ social ties and the degree to which people exercise social control in their neighborhoods. Social ties and informal control are theorized as mediating the effects of exogenous sources of social disorganization (e.g., poverty, residential instability, ethnic heterogeneity) on neighborhood crime. Examples of informal control include residents’ efforts to prevent or sanction disorderly…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Social structure theories view societal, financial, and social arrangements or structures as the primary cause of deviant and criminal behaviors (University of Phoenix, 2013). In other words, the primary cause of crime or deviant behavior can be traced to the less fortunate, or lower class of people. Social structure theories indicate that neighborhoods of lower class individuals suffer from immense strain, stress, frustration, and a kind of disorganized chaos that creates crime (Inchaustegui, n.d.). While this theory definitely has some truths regarding resources and some people’s experiences, certain strains…

    • 2073 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Labelling Theory

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Labelling theory addresses a larger definition of crime, referring not only to illegal conduct or actions but much rather to deviant behaviour in general. Deviance is seen as a quality attributed to a certain act by those who witness it directly or indirectly and deem it immoral and wrong. Behaviours acquire the label of being deviant by social interaction and maintain it by social learning. This new approach is in contradiction with the former views of crime as inherent to the action or behaviour and in some cases excusable by the circumstances such as anomie or social strain, which assume homogenous norms and equal responses or punishments to all those guilty.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Howard Becker is a sociologist that is often credited with the development of the labelling theory. However the origins of this theory can be traced back to sociologists at the beginning of the twentieth century who made invaluable contributions to the creation of the “labelling” concept. The first was Charles Cooley who wrote “Human Nature and the Social Order” in 1902, in which he introduced the term the “looking glass self”. This idea suggests that an individual will respond to society based on how the individual thinks society perceives them. Another was Frank Tannenbaum (1938) who studied juvenile participation in street gangs. He argued that when society defines certain behaviour as deviant, a “tag” is then placed upon the individual that displayed the deviant behaviour, thus causing further deviant / criminal behaviour. Although Cooley and Tannenbaum influenced Becker it was the much later influence of Edwin Lamert that truly led the way. Lemert was, by many of his peers, credited with introduction of the ‘original’ version of the labelling theory. In Lemert’s 1951 publication, “Social Pathology” he states that primary deviance is the original offence that causes a figure in authority to “label” the offender as deviant. Furthermore he states that if said offender accepts the deviant “label” offered to them, this will result in further deviance, known as secondary deviance. This may then lead to a “self- fulfilling prophecy” causing the individual to live up to their deviant label.…

    • 1985 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Social disorganization and organized crime are both related. They are both aggravated and tolerated by corrupt and weak political officers. Criminal behavior and illegal activities abound for communities that lack strong social ties and have no solid grounds to combat common societal problems. Moreover, the lack of social control to resolve conflicts and attain progressive communal goals deteriorates the social and family structure that, in the end, converts into more serious problems of the community, especially organized crimes.…

    • 78 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The people that live in this neighborhood learn different values and techniques that is associated with committing a crime. The social learning theory argues that neighborhoods or not social disorganized, but they are organized in a different way(Paynich & hill, 2010,p.54,58,59).…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Within criminal justice Labelling Theory has been seen as a way of manipulating and encouraging both the would be offender to think and behaviours in a particular way so as to live up to the label and equally to manipulate and direct the thoughts and actions of those that work and manage the system e.g. a label encourages them to takes on particular negative perspective or bias towards a person or group of people. This essay will focus on describing all aspects of Labelling Theory in relation to crime and the criminal justice system. It will also evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of Labelling Theory which dominated sociological theory of crime and thinking in the 1960’ and 70’s.…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lilly's Labeling Theory

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Thus, when discussing labeling theory, it can be assumed that society is the most responsible for the deviant behaviors of its citizens for various reasons. The first, and presumably most significant, is the fact that powerful citizens are in charge of determining which behaviors are considered criminal and which ones are not. For example, wife battering was only criminalized when individuals were motivated to create legal reform, it was not always a crime (Lilly, 2015). Society is also responsible for such behaviors because they construct the labels that lead citizens to make negative assumptions about offenders that are often times untrue (Lilley et al., 2015). As a result, these assumptions influence people’s reactions to offenders, making room for stereotyping and stigmas that produce unequal treatment for all offenders (Lilly, 2015). For example, a murder takes places in our community. While the murder itself is considered a socially deviant act, weather or not it will be viewed as a homicide depends upon the reaction of others, rather than the act itself (Lilly, 2015). If the victim was a police officer, people are going to react differently than if the victim was a…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Clifford R. Shaw and Henry D. McKay (107) observed Juvenile Delinquency in urban areas, and one of the first things they discussed in their chapter was the different values in separate economic areas of the city, and how the socioeconomic status contributes to the amount of crime. Secondly, they discussed differential social organization, which includes the differences in values between the communities (Shaw and McKay). A Theory of Race, Crime and Urban inequality is explained by Robert J. Sampson and William Julius Wilson (114) and they discussed the effects of community structure of race and crime in urban areas. Another thing that Sampson and Wilson (116) debated was the ecological concentration of race and social dislocations. Finally, they discuss the structure of…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Males are most likely to be involved in violent offending and victimization. Males commit about 9 out of 10 homicides in the United States and account for about 3 in every 4 of it’s victims. Most homicides are male-on-male, which makes them the predominant gender in homicide patterns. About 2 in every 3 homicides involve a male offender and a male victim. Men are also more likely to killed by an intimate partner or in a sex-related offense. But, 82% male juvenile offenders are likely to commit homicides(Humphrey & Schmalleger,2012).…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social disorganization believes that the primary factor that affects individual’s behavior and action towards criminal tendencies is the location or the neighborhood. Poor locations or neighborhoods, or known as urban areas, can facilitates destruction of community institutions, values, and social control. According to this theory, the presence of poverty, mixed ethnicity overpopulated areas, multicultural growth, and large number of adult criminals inside of the urban areas can lead to diminishing ties between social values and social control that holds a community together. Thus, immigration increases crime because it causes social change and creates social disorganization that makes social control less effective…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays