Preview

Soc203 Lecture 1

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
511 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Soc203 Lecture 1
SOC203 Lecture 1
January 7, 2013

INEQUALITY

1. French peasants before the Revolution: 1789 -- french revolution

2. French lords before the Revolution
- monopolized, concentrated power: economic, religious, political
- the lord made law, held by ideological reasoning from the church
- Tocqueville: why did the French revolution break out despite social conditions being better off than other nations?
- his answer:
- 1) peasants rebelled b/c lords had unrestrained position (social position)
- 2) the problem was not their position: but rather their relative position compared to the ideal position - raised expectations and dissatisfaction (anomie)

3. Inequality is a social fact
- social fact: e.g. Durkheim & suicide rates; constancy means that there is something about society
- inequality is not a feature that can be identified by looking at individuals: to say
- inequality it implies a comparison in the distribution of a social good

4. some main forms of inequality
- social goods comprises all societies
- things that are valued
- some are cultural bound e.g.. N. America & Leisure time (opportunity to do such)
- N. America & wealth
- status
- power
**within societies- there are agreed upon qualities to have**
**sociologists: concerned with the variation in the distribution of resources**

5. Some main sources of inequality
** see above**
- military strength also v. imp

6. Inequality in pre-modern societies:
a. hunter gatherer - a classless society - no real strong differences
- rests on merely hunting and gathering
- generalized reciprocity: no expectation of immediate return; the system under where the food is distributed equally
- subject to a gendered division of labour (men hunt, woman gather) BUT in general, not patriarchal
- gender equality existed
- political equality existed
- economic equality existed
- importance of non accumulating materials contrasted with present day society where one can own an

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    There were three estates that made up the population of France. The First Estate was made up of the Clergy, the Second of Nobility, and the Third of Commoners. Of these estates, it was the Third that constituted the majority of the population. The commoners of the Third Estate included the bourgeoisie (middle class), the peasants (about 80 percent of the total population of France), and the working poor, who were surprisingly quite influential. It is evident in the way that the population was separated that the monarchy had based its society on wealth and education, but the Third estate was not happy with this setup.…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    french revolutin dbq

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Social causes for the French Revolution were varied. One such problem was the well being of the 3rd estate. According to Travels in France by Arthur Young the conditions of the 3rd estate were terrible as people could not purchase bread due to the high prices and the ragged conditions of the children (Document #1). Because of these factors the people were forced to fight each other for a piece of bread alone. Another problem was the middle class’ knowledge of the Enlightenment. According to The French Revolution historian Albert Mathiez, the middle class’ knowledge of the Enlightenment made them start the revolution rather than the unintelligent working class (Document #3). The social world of France was a front for the revolution to begin because of the people who were mistreated by the government.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The start of the French Revolution was directly in French society. Society was constantly dominated by nobles, or a social group that was primarily made up of: aristocrats, officeholders, professionals, merchants and businessmen. The French society was broken up into three social classes, or better known as “Estates.”. The First Estate was comprised of all the clergy; the Second Estate was comprised of the nobility, and the Third Estate was comprised of everyone else, including wealthy lawyers, businessmen, urban laborers and poor peasants. The Third Estate was by far the largest social class. All of these classes had one thing in common, and that was a want for an economy that would serve their interests. The nobility depended on a constant infusion of talent and economic power form the wealthy social groups represented in the Third Estate. Less prosperous lawyers were jealous of the privileged position very few had in their profession. Over the course of the century the price of offices rose, making it more difficult to buy one’s way into nobility, and creating tensions between middling members of the Third Estate and the very rich in trade and commerce who were the only group able to afford to climb the social ladder. Several fault lines ran through the elite and the middle classes which led to resentment of the government and a need for change.…

    • 564 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    MKTG3114 Lecture 1

    • 1968 Words
    • 26 Pages

    MKTG3114 New Products Marketing lecture 1: intro. & course overview Presented by Dr. Jeffrey Lim Discipline of Marketing The University of Sydney Page 1 Agenda – Introduction and housekeeping – What this unit is about – key topics – Learning and application opportunities • Assessment tasks – Teaching team – Lecture 1 – Setting the scene – Concluding comments and wrapping up The University of Sydney Page 2 What this unit is about – key topics…

    • 1968 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The French Revolution was a very tough and many people lived in horrible conditions. Diseases spread rapidly, food was scarce, and the poor were being taken advantage of by the wealthy. Peasants were singled out by the tax system and payed much more compared to those who were better off. “The guilty one is not he who commits the sin, but he who causes the darkness”. The Thenardiers aren’t at fault for what was going in France during this time period. It was basically impossible for peasants to get ahead since all of their money was going toward their landlords, the church, and the government. Inflation was also a huge problem during this time, so it was hard for the lower class to buy the goods they needed with the little money they were able to earn. With all the odds against them, it makes sense for the Thenardiers to turn to corruption. They know by living an honest life they won’t get anywhere, and they want to get more out of life. Because of this, corruption was the only option for the Thenardiers to get where they wanted to…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The French Revolution signifies the end of an era - absolutism - and a consequential shift of balance of power as known during feudalism (S10) . As a consequence the old regime -clergy and nobility - comes to an end, the bourgeoisie rises among other reasons because to the money it had accumulated through commerce and industry and the peasants, that initially joined the bourgeoisie to propose liberty, equality and fraternity as a way to improve their freedoms and living conditions, became disappointed and organize a counter revolution. Three main social groups coexisted during the French Revolution: Clergy or “First State”, the Nobility or “Second State” and the bourgeoisie and the peasants or “Third State”. No matter that the “Third State” was the majority of the French population, the right of property was unequally distributed since 10% of the total property was owned by 1% of the population and 97% of the population owned only 55% of the total French land.(S6). Besides, the “Third State” was subject to several taxes benefiting the clergy and the nobility and its members could barely survive because they were also obliged to give for free the products they cultivated from the land.…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    … And so it began in the year of 1789, a revolution that would change France and all Europe forever. France was renowned for its opulent monarchy that kept stability, but cared more about its possessions rather than its people. The country was sorted by social class which was divided into three estates. The 3rd estate was the largest, consisting of 97% of the population who was poor and resided on only 65% of the total land. Above this was the 2nd estate, which made up 2% of the country's residents, the outstanding nobles. The highest level was the 1st estate. This division was comprised of the high church officials who maintained…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Economic Inequality

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The current level of economic inequality can be in fact considered acceptable. The word acceptable by definition is to be cable or worthy of being accepted; pleasing, satisfying, or agreeable by the receiver. And in that case, someone who is on the beneficial side of the inequality usually doesn’t have a problem with it. For example, if there was a rule that said all football players can skip the lunch line, majority of the players including myself would accept it strictly because we are on the beneficial side of it. Therefore, it would be acceptable because I can get my food before you just because I play football. Now if we flip the script and make football players wait in line, the inequality would not be acceptable by them. But to address the question, I think the level of economic inequality is not acceptable. It is unacceptable to me not because I am on the beneficial or unfair side, but because inequality itself is unethical. In no way, shape, or form should any type of inequality be accepted, legalized, or justified in any way but in our society, that’s just how it is. I would want less economic inequality so that economic resources are distributed more evenly just because I feel like it is the right thing to do. If everyone had access to the same amount of resources, then the gap between the richest people and the poorest people wouldn’t be so wide. I believe that everyone would have an equal chance to reach their potential if provided with the equal amount of resources. (Education, money, etc.) It is possible to have complete economic equality. But similar to Karl Marx’s prediction that capitalism will be supplanted by a society with no division between a “rich” and “poor”, I understand the possibility but just don’t see it actually happening. I believe that the future level of economic inequality can go up or down but will not be completely…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    General reciprocity is defined as an exchange where a person gives a good or a service to someone else, but does not receive anything back at that time. The expectation is that, if and when the recipient has something, that person will give goods or services back to the original giver. With no set date or time of repayment. Along with this, often times there are no discussions about what the value or return must be for the exchange. This means that the time and value of repayment is left to the recipient to decide. Often times this act is referred to as gift giving and paying it forward. This style of reciprocity strongly relies on trust and faith. In society this form of reciprocity has been widely use to gain good standing within a social community, building trust and friendship within. Sometimes politically driven general Reciprocity can be used to gain positive public relations in order to accomplish a goal within the community, such as leadership or other high standing position within a society.…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    MMW 14 Lecture 1

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2. E.g. Apples fall to the ground; therefore there is a universal force that pulls things to Earth.…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    crim 131 lecture 1

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages

    federal corrections (correctional service of Canada); deal with sentences of 2 years or longer (2 year or less is dealt by with the provincial government)…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Los pitufos

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The idea of reciprocity says that people by nature feel obliged to provide either discounts or concessions to others if they’ve received favors from those others. Psychology explains this by stressing that we humans simply hate to feel indebted to other people!…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Wk5 Final Paper SOC 312

    • 530 Words
    • 2 Pages

    After I graduate Ashford University and obtain my bachelors in sociology I will be pursuing a teaching career at Teachers for America. This class has introduced lots of information that is definitely going to be useful in my teaching career. Understanding the nature of families and children and how they relate to society is very important as an educator. Being part of a child’s socialization is something that should be taken serious as the different agents shape the child’s behavior, morals, value, and other important attributes. Teachers, just as other socialization agents can help many aspects of a child’s life or it harm them. Families have their own set of customs, beliefs, values, morals, and these things are passed on their children. Through out our textbook we can see how this can become a problem when the child starts to associate with people that are not part of his or her family. Society sometimes imposes certain things that children sometimes do not understand. For example, when both parents raise a child and their values are different from that of the society in which they live in, people that are not part of their circle may misinterpret the child’s actions. In the child’s eyes, their actions are normal but to others this action might be something that is frowned upon in that particular society.…

    • 530 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lecture 05 1

    • 3532 Words
    • 48 Pages

    where D = diag{ Γ11 (0), · · · , Γkk (0)}. We use convention…

    • 3532 Words
    • 48 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gift Giving in Societies

    • 1848 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Reciprocity is a form of gift exchange whereby objects have no concept of perceived value. Social gain is seen as more important than any potential economic result in this system. An object would be presented to another and this gesture insure social relations, a return object (or gesture) may be presented at a later date, but the main aim of reciprocity exchange would be the strengthening of social bonds.…

    • 1848 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics