top-rated free essay

Snyder vs. Phelps

By luisgonzalez1982 Sep 01, 2014 778 Words
Snyder vs. Phelps
Respondents Fred W. Phelps, Shirley L. Phelps-Roper, and Rebekah A Phelps-Davis had protested at the military funeral of Petitioner Albert Snyder's son, Matthew Snyder. They held signs saying “God Hates the USA”, “God Hates Fags”, “Thank God for Dead Soldiers”, “Thank God for 9/11”, and other phrases. This case stirred a deep emotional reaction at the Supreme Court that nearly all of the states and the federal government have now passed laws to curb such tactics.

Since 1991, the congregation of Westboro Baptist Church of Topeka, led by Pastor Fred Phelps and comprised mostly of his relatives, has set pickets at public events to protest what they believe to be America's pervasive immortality. They started targeting funerals and memorial services for the military dead in 2005. They believe that the wrath of God pours out on people if they do sin, and especially if they forget God's word, and make proud sin a way of life. The “proud sin” of which they complain about is homosexuality, including same-sex marriage, fornication, adultery, murder, greed and idolatry. They decided to protest at Matthew Snyder's funeral on March 10, 2006 because they thought it was a fit occasion for their picketing since Matthew's death had drawn considerable media coverage. They were aroused by the fact that Matthew's parents were divorced, that the family was Catholic, and that Matthew was a soldier who had died to “pay for his country's sins”.

Snyder sued the Phelpses for intentional infliction of emotional distress, invasion of privacy by intrusion upon seclusion, and conspiracy. The jury found in favor Snyder, awarding him $2.9 million in compensatory damages and $8 million in punitive damages. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned the jury award, holding that the speech of the Phelpses was rhetorical hyperbole and thus protected under the First Amendment, regardless of whether Snyder's son was a public figure. It was protected because it involved “matters of public concern” and did not contain a “provably false factual connotation.” Afterward, the Supreme Court granted certiorari on March 8, 2010 to review the Fourth Circuit's decision. The Supreme Court affirmed the judgement of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. Chief Justice John Roberts, who delivered the majority opinion, wrote, “Whether the First Amendment prohibits holding Westboro liable for its speech in this case turns largely on whether that speech is of public or private concern.” The judges determined that the words on Westboro's signs indeed dealt with “matters of public import” and are thus protected by the First Amendment. The court also noted that Westboro “stayed well away from the memorial service”. The protesters apparently gathered lawfully in a public area under police supervision and did not interfere with the procession or service. Snyder's lone backer, Justice Samuel Alito, wrote a passionate dissent that accuses his colleagues of being plain mean. He was in complete disagreement with the majority opinion of the court. Alito wrote, “ Respondents' outrageous conduct caused petitioner great injury, and the Court now compounds that injury by depriving petitioner of a judgment that acknowledges the wrong he suffered.” Alito said that any reasonable person could interpret Westboro's signs as personal attacks on a dead soldier rather than opinions about public issues.

The issue here is if an individual's interest in suing to recover for the disruption of a family member's funeral outweigh the disrupter's First Amendment right to freedom of speech. If I were to be in the Supreme Court, I would be on Snyder's side. It is very sad to lose a son and for a group of people to take advantage of your son's funeral is very mean. I must agree with Alito. I would interpret those signs as personal attacks. Especially because one of the signs said “Thank God For Dead Soldiers”. It is definitely directed to Matthew because he was a soldier. The Phelpses traveled many miles to protest at Matthew's funeral. They specifically went to his funeral. It wasn't just a coincidence. There should be limits to freedom of speech. A funeral should be considered at the same level of privacy one expects to receive in his or her home.

This case has not only caused a big commotion but has brought deep sadness to Snyder. He was never really able to grieve his son's death in peace. We should have the right to a peaceful funeral, It is okay to protest but there should be a limit to it as to where and when. After all, the government should of tried harder to side with Snyder since his son was serving the country we stand on.

Cited Sources:,8599,2056613,00.html

Cite This Document

Related Documents

  • Phelps v. Snyder

    ...this country. Albert Snyder, father of the late Matthew Snyder, has every right in his power to be suing Fred Phelps, pastor and founder of Westboro Baptist Church and the congregation, in seeking redemption for Matthew on numerous grounds. I, personally, have the right to be buried and laid in peace as does everyone else. A family should have t...

    Read More
  • Snyder V Phelps

    ...Snyder V. Phelps Everyone is entitled to practice their religion. Everyone has the right to voice their opinion. The bill of rights states that this right could never be taken away, but does it make it right for a person to use this right to attack a person? On March 3rd, 2006 a Marine, Lance Corporal Matthew Snyder, di...

    Read More
  • Case study snyder v phelps

    ...Case Study: Snyder v. Phelps (2011) Fred Phelps, the pastor at the Westboro Church, along with his followers believes that God punishes the US for allowing homosexuality freedoms, especially within the military. To express their feelings the Westboro Church and its people sometimes picket military funerals in hopes that their voices will be h...

    Read More

    ...Hair Detective Your first lab link can be found at Describe the crime that you are investigating in this activity. I was investigating about who snuck in the Curtail Cuts bedroom, messed with their clothes and left a trai...

    Read More
  • Mitch Snyder

    ...Mitch Snyder (1943-1990) is known mostly for his work advocating for the rights of homeless people and specifically as a leader of the Community For Creative Non-Violence (CCNV). CCNV began in the early 1970s as an anti-war group and evolved into an organization that provides food, clothing, shelter, and educational programs for the poor and hom...

    Read More
  • Micheal Phelps

    ...Rachael Richardson March 2, 2009 Michael Phelps fans are right to be disappointed in him for smoking marijuana at a party. I am one of his fans, but I am aggravated by his decisions and I think some other people are too. “ Many people are disappointed in Michael’s decisions, Phelps is a role model, he is well aware of the r...

    Read More
  • Is vs It

    ...Information systems (IS) focuses on the system making use of technology and information technology (IT) focuses on technology and how it can help in disseminating information. Usually Information system are build using the information technology. Information system referring to system designed to create, store, manipulate, communicate and di...

    Read More
  • Michael Phelps

    ...myself…why not? No limits” (Phelps 14). Michael Phelps is a name that will always be associated with the word swimming. He made the sport well-known by his eight medal wins at the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games, and is the most decorated Olympian in the world. He had been swimming since he was seven years old, and competed at only fifteen years ...

    Read More

Discover the Best Free Essays on StudyMode

Conquer writer's block once and for all.

High Quality Essays

Our library contains thousands of carefully selected free research papers and essays.

Popular Topics

No matter the topic you're researching, chances are we have it covered.