Top-Rated Free Essay

Smoking Should Be Banned in Public Places.

Good Essays
Do you mind people smoking around you in public places? According to the pro-smoking group Air Initiative 7 in 10 of you do. Do you think it is fair to discriminate against smokers, forcing them to stand outside and smoke? On the other hand is it fair that non-smokers should have to inhale second hand smoke which can dame their health? (Do you support this ban or do you oppose it?) Personally I oppose it as I believe that non-smokers shouldn't be subjected to a smoky environment on a night out. I am a non-smoker which would undoubtedly be the reason behind me supporting the ban however if I was a smoker I would probably view the ban in a completely different light. If there was a ban it would affect my social life as smoking is being frowned upon and has been since the 17th Century. In this essay I will examine both sides of this controversial issue.
Smoking has been a controversial issue since as far back as 1604 when Scotland's James III wrote "A custom loathsome to the eye, hateful to the nose, harmful to the brain and dangerous to the lungs." Recently an advertisement campaign has been launched by the Health Promotion Agency which urges people to vote for the ban. It shows smoking in a bar as unacceptable. It also compares passive smoking to someone sitting in front of you coughing into your face. Personally I wouldn't like someone coughing in my face and I don't particularly enjoy sitting in a bar inhaling second hand smoke which is damaging my health.
A Welsh newspaper, Wales on Sunday claimed that if non-smokers spent 20hours per week in a pub they would have only inhaled the equivalent of 19 cigarettes. 19 may not seem that much but it is 19 cigarettes more than what they choose to smoke. I think that this is unacceptable as non-smokers are forced to inhale harmful smoke while on a night out. So in order to have fun they have to suffer the consequences of the smokers' addiction.
This is one of the main reasons why smokers are turning into social outcasts. They believe that they have the right to smoke wherever they choose while smokers feel that their rights have been violated and their health damaged.
In a recent survey 28% of employed people said that they would like their employer to ban smoking completely at work. Bar staff in particular are greatly affected as smoking in bars is seen as normal. However when you apply for a job you aren't

Vivienne Nathanson, B.M.A Head of Science and Ethics said ‘After smoke free laws came into effect in Montana, heart attacks fell by 40%. This statistic is appalling and clearly illustrates the number of heart attacks as a result of smoking. Smoking is one of the UK's biggest killers causing 120,000 per year, that's 330 deaths a day. Smoking is costing the NHS around £1.7 billion per year which could be used to treat and help prevent cancer. Another report stated that services to aid people quit smoking costs on average £4.1 billion which is too much money to throw away nowadays.
If the government pass a law to ban smoking less people would need medical attention and therefore shorter waiting lists in the NHS, but also because tax on cigarettes is around 70% less money would be available. There is no solution. In my opinion the government should increase the tax on cigarettes because then less people would purchase them and the government would receive money from the tax from the cigarettes that are purchased.
In some cases the government has been described as hypocritical as they make billions of pounds from smokers per year and the patronises and penalises smokers. Next they will be banning everything potentially dangerous and turning the practitioners into social outcasts. I disagree as smoking is unique among other habits as it harms the health of others.
In conclusion to this essay I believe that either smoking in public places should be banned or else the government should come up with a compromise. I want the government to take action because on some occasions I have become an unwilling second hand smoker. In my opinion it is the smoker's problem not mine's so why would I have to go and stand outside to avoid inhaling the toxic fumes coming straight from the end of his/hers cigarette. I believe that the smoker should go stand outside because as I said before its their problem, their addiction not mine.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    TOPIC: SMOKING IN PUBLIC PLACES ATTITUDE: Smoking is dirty, Smoking leaves ashes, matches and butts on the ground, Smoking bothers other people, Smoking is dangerous, People cough and hate the smell, Smoking is bad for your health, Smoking is a bad influence on young people, Careless smokers can cause building and forest fires, Smoking kills and damages the organs. Purpose: To information Thesis: Smoking should be banned from public places Audience: 1. My audience are very aware of…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Smoking Should Be Banned In Public Places In my opinion, smoking in public places should be prohibited. There are many reasons that support this point of view. Smoking is one of the leading killers in world. People shouldn't die because of it. For years people have been smoking in public thinking 'it's my body, I can do whatever I want to it,' but now that it has been proven that smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those around him or her, they should not be allowed to smoke…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Smoking Should Be Banned in Public Places Have you ever been out in public, and you inhaled a cloud of smoke from someone smoking? Smoking in public places should be banned; it not just only harms you as the smoker but also the people around you when you light up a cigarette. It is called Second- hand smoke. Second-hand smoke comes in two ways; side stream and mainstream. Many people may say that smoking should not be banned because it is a free country and that person can walk away or move. But…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Smoking in Public Places Should be banned Argumentative Justin Brennan I think smoking in public places needs to be banned. As a citizen I feel that my family and I should be able to have a choice whether we want to be around cigarette smoke or not. The laws on smoking in public areas are getting much better, but we still need to make more changes. There is no smoking in places like restaurants, bus stops, and some buildings and parks, but not all the laws get enforced as well as they could…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    I remember that when I was child, I saw one public service announcement in the television that was performed by Yul Brynner, who was an actor of "The King and I". In an announcement, he said, "If I hadn't had smoking the cigarette, I would not have talked to you smoking was hazardous the health". An announcement was played after he had died in lung cancer, which was caused by smoking. This announcement gave me deeply impression that cigarette was harmful our health absolutely. However, how many people…

    • 864 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Smoking is a bad habit, and it is not good for human health. It makes people who do not smoke are unhealthy and feel annoyed. Therefore, I think the smoking should be banned in public places such as hospitals, post offices and airports. First, smoking is harmful to people’s health. Smokers want to smoke wherever they want, and they do not care about people surrounding. This reason makes non-smokers get lung and respiratory diseases. For example, children inhale smoke for a long time, they will…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    who smoke have increase over the years. Although they are equipped with the knowledge of how unhealthy smoking can be, people still choose to smoke. It is a personal choice and a highly addictive habit. Smokers choose to subject themselves to the health risks of smoking. It is not for the government or any third party to dictate whether or not a person should be allowed to smoke. However, smoking does not only affect the smoker negatively. It also affects all the people around those who smoke because…

    • 1674 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Smoking Should Be Banned In Public Places Smoking is currently under siege as never before with a spate of high profile health injuries cases. Cigarette smoke, a dangerous chemical, consists of both active smoke and passive smoke, through which people may inhale. Non-smokers meet smokers in many public places like restaurants, railway stations, buses, offices, etc. Both active smokers and passive smokers are equally affected. Based on two realistic factors including the health affection and…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Passive smoking is the inhaling of second hand smoke. It is damaging the lungs of thousands of innocent Australians every year. All because some people are addicted and protest that it there right to smoke and endanger fellow workmates in public places. Banns are currently in discussion to finally protect workplace employees from passive smoking. Just think of the stench that embeds your clothing when you exit a nightclub or restaurant. With smoking banns in place, venues like these and many others…

    • 624 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Essay on Should Smoking be banned in Public Places ? MANISH RAJKOOMAR ESSAY Many surveys, studies and scientific research has proved that smoking is injurious to health. Smoke is unhealthy and suffocating. It pollutes the environment. There are two types of smokers - active and passive. The person who smokes is active and other who are near to him and inhale the smoke are passive smokers. Both are equally affected by the ill effects of smoking. Smokers and non-smokers meet at many places like offices…

    • 787 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays